论文字检验中非本质性差异点

在文字鉴定工作中，非本质性差异点不同程度地存在着。这种差异点形成的原因是多方面的，其中包括：客观书写条件影响；故意伪装；书写习惯在自身的发展演变等，在文字鉴定中正确认识这些差异点并认真分析其产生的原因，才能作出正确的结论。     

对于《数控编程》教学的几点思考

《数控编程》是高职院校机械系"机械制造与自动化"、"数控技术应用"和其它许多机电类专业的一门主干专业课。本文根据以往教学实践,结合高职学生的培养目标和学生的素质特点,在教学内容、课程体系、教学方法与手段和实践教学体系等方面进行了新的探索,从而为进一步提高教学质量,培养掌握数控技术的应用型、技能型人才,满足市场对该类人才需要打好基础。     

社会主义核心价值体系：思想政治教育内容的新发展

党的十六届六中全会提出“建设社会主义核心价值体系”的科学论断，社会主义核心价值是社会主义和谐文化的核心价值。它以科学的体系，对思想政治教育起了明确核心教育内容的重要意义，并使教育内容体系更加系统化。以社会主义核心价值体系来优化思想政治教育的内容，较之当前思想政治教育内容，有诸多的优点。     

对文化多元主义的反思

在当今全球化时代,肯定文化差异的文化多元主义为大多数人所赞同,但它不是没有问题.文化多元主义作为一种社会政策存在着难以解决的问题,作为意识形态则很容易走到与人类文化本质相反的道路,因此必须对文化多元主义保持一种反思的态度,坚持文化的主体性原则.     

Allocative or Distributive Aims of Income Taxation?

Relations of income tax legislation and economic development are traditional subjects of German public finance. Reginald Hansen's book (1996) on practical consequences of the “Methodenstreit” for income taxation is considered under three aspects: history of economic thought, tax-systems and aims of income taxation. The introduction is followed by four paragraphs: 1. Long-term views of income taxation, 2. Reginald Hansen's comments on income taxation in Germany, 3. From Schmoller and Wagner to the modern German type of income taxation, 4. “Ability to pay,” “Pay as you use” or what else? The article demonstrates progressive and restrictive results of the long-term view focusing on the evaluation of income taxation principles.     

应用文写作教学“去文学化“探讨

应用文写作教学中,专业教育所养成的教师的文学思维定势,是导致教学目的和教学内容发生偏移的重要原因.应该从两类文体(实用类、审美类)写作的不同思维方式、不同表达方法以及培养不同的"话语责任人"等方面加以区分,以社会职业工作需要为导向,以写作技术为重心,构建符合应用文自身特质的教学内容体系.     

Fairness of Allocations among Groups of Unknown Others

The aim of three experiments was to examine the idea that when judging the fairness of allocations people are influenced both by differences in relative payoffs and the number of comparisons among payoffs. The hypothesis tested was that judged fairness would be inversely related to the average difference between payoffs; average difference was defined as the sum of absolute differences between outcomes to groups divided by the number of pairwise comparisons between the groups. In Experiment 1, 24 undergraduates rated fairness and goodness (desirability) of allocations to one privileged and one underprivileged group consisting of fellow students. The participants were not themselves members of the groups and their ratings did not depend on evaluations by the groups members. Results showed, as expected, that differences in payoff determined judgments of fairness but also that larger sums were to some extent rated as more fair than smaller sums. However, as the sum increased, the effect of difference was shown to decrease. Fairness ratings partially mediated ratings of goodness. In Experiment 2, 72 undergraduates rated fairness and goodness of combinations of payoffs to two or four groups consisting of fellow students. Results confirmed that rated fairness was inversely related to the average difference between payoffs. The total sum of the groups payoffs was again found to somewhat increase rated fairness, whereas the number of members in the groups did not have any clear effect. In Experiment 3, 24 undergraduates rated the goodness of allocations to two, three, and four groups. The results showed similar effects as in the preceding experiments.     

差异还不是矛盾——对《矛盾论》引述“差异就是矛盾”的再认识

上个世纪三十年代,苏联哲学界批判德波林学派“关于差异不是矛盾”的见解,并提出“差异就是矛盾”的论断。毛泽东同志在《矛盾论》中作了引证。实际上,差异会发展为对立,但并不等于对立,差异只是潜在的矛盾,但还不是矛盾。差异、对立、矛盾,既有联系,又有区别,是不能混为一谈的。     

Mothers on Trial: Discourses of Cot Death and Munchausen’s Syndrome by Proxy

This article explores some of the issues raised by Munchausens Syndrome by Proxy (MSbP) and the relationship between medicine and law, specifically the discourses which feature in the courtroom portraying motherhood and expectations of parenting. These discourses are often hidden yet play a determining role in prosecutions for alleged maltreatment of children involving medically unexplained infant death syndrome. We offer a critique of MSbP and seek to unveil the assumptions about mothers, the parent predominantly affected by the diagnosis, and mothering that underlie the association of women accused of deliberating harming their children. We suggest such insights are valuable because although the syndrome has never acquired a clear medical or legal definition, it has had repeated appearances in the literature and courtroom over the last 25 years and has more recently attracted attention from government, health care practitioners, academics and the media. We explore these issues through an examination of two recent Court of Appeal decisions in England: those of Sally Clark and Angela Cannings.     

"非典"心理意义的性别比较

本研究采用联想组合分析法,比较了“非典”一词在“非典”期间对男女大学生的心理意义,受试为京、沪、穗、港、台520名大学生。结果发现,男性的非典视角以“病”为中心,重“硬”信息,重群体控制和治疗;女性的非典视角以“人”为中心,重“软”信息,重个人预防。在主观反应中,男性的负面情绪联想高于女性;女性的负面判断联想高于男性。这些结果与以往应激反应中“脆弱性”的性别差异研究有所不同,可从社会性别视角加以解释。