从判决释理谈我国民事替代性纠纷解决机制的重构

ADR强调通过当事人合意解决纠纷,而司法程序通过强制性权威解决纠纷。由于私法领域中纠纷当事人具备法律上地位的平等性和处分权．强调通过合意而解决纠纷并进而促进当事人自治的ADR在法理上和实践中都得到了广泛支持。以此为鉴,重构我国民事替代性纠纷解决机制势在必行。     

论我国古代调处制度与和谐社会的构建

调处制度是我国古代实现“无讼”法律文化的一种司法制度,在处理社会纠纷的实践中发挥着重要作用。适应建设和谐社会的需要,对调处制度在借鉴的同时予以革新和改造,完善我国现有的调解制度,使它既能适应现实解纷止争的需要,又不违背依法治国的方向,将构建和谐社会与依法治国完美地结合起来。     

论我国诉讼与诉讼外纠纷解决方式的有机衔接

建立多元化纠纷解决制度,是构建和谐社会的必然要求,是在改革过程中有效化解人民内部矛盾的有效方式,是市民社会和政治国家有效分离的途径,是党和国家尊重人权、重视民意、保护公民自治权利的重要方式。通过传统纠纷解决方式与现代纠纷解决方式的结合,法律与道义、宽容、情感等价值的渗透,公权力和意思自治的分配,法律职业共同体和市民自治团体的互动,使各种机制形成合力,将纠纷彻底化解,最终构建一个民主法治、公平正义、诚信友爱、充满活力、安定有序的和谐社会。     

金融消费者概念与完善金融消费保护

本文从金融消费者概念入手,阐述了金融服务消费者保护监管的理论基础及重点国家的金融保护实践,通过对发达国家或地区在金融服务消费者保护的立法及监管机制进行比较分析,提出改善我国金融服务消费者保护监管的政策及法律建议。     

Conflict Resolution in Mexican American Adolescents’ Friendships: Links with Culture,Gender and Friendship Quality

This study was designed to describe the conflict resolution practices used in Mexican American adolescents’ friendships, to explore the role of cultural orientations and values and gender-typed personality qualities in conflict resolution use, and to assess the connections between conflict resolution and friendship quality. Participants were 246 Mexican American adolescents (M = 12.77 years of age) and their older siblings (M = 15.70 years of age). Results indicated that adolescents used solution-oriented strategies most frequently, followed by nonconfrontation and control strategies. Girls were more likely than boys to use solution-oriented strategies and less likely to use control strategies. Familistic values and gender-typed personality qualities were associated with solution-oriented conflict resolution strategies. Finally, conflict resolution strategies were related to overall friendship quality: solution-oriented strategies were positively linked to intimacy and negatively associated with friendship negativity, whereas nonconfrontation and control strategies were associated with greater relationship negativity.

IS THE TURN TOWARD COLLABORATIVE LAW A TURN AWAY FROM JUSTICE?

The new trend in Collaborative Family Law (CFL) in the United States and Canada raises new questions about theories of justice. CFL achieves many of the goals of a viable theory of justice and its implicit critique of the legal system is a valid one. However, it unnecessarily demonizes law and has yet to explicitly articulate where it fits in terms of its own theory of justice. After considering the claims made by CFL, it is apparent that while some are productive, others are problematic and should be discarded. Specifically, CFL's rejection of factual determinacy may be inappropriate in some cases. The CFL approach has the potential to ignore problems of power imbalance, and may sacrifice just outcomes for the sake of efficiency. The emphasis on relationships and the need for their protection is not always an appropriate approach, and in demonizing law in favor of private ordering, CFL unnecessarily rejects the importance of law as a site for public participation in the creation and defense of norms. CFL is an important step forward in law reform, but if it is to fulfill its potential, it needs to incorporate within its practice a theory of justice that avoids the pitfalls of liberal individualism and allows for the public authorship of norms.     

美国阶梯式纠纷解决条款执行力问题研究

如何选择一种更快捷、更有效以及更便宜的方式来解决合同纠纷,是国际商事社会如今所面临的挑战。这并不是说要摒弃传统的诉讼和仲裁等争议解决机制,而是指需要用其他替代手段来补充这些机制。本文将以美国为例,对ADR方式作为仲裁或诉讼前置程序的阶梯式纠纷解决条款进行研究,以期提供给当事方最好的争议解决机制来满足维持其彼此间良好关系的特殊需要。     

背离公司担保决议规制的法效果——分析路径的困境与出路

根据公司法,公司为他人提供担保的,应当经股东会或董事会决议。对违背决议要求的公司担保行为的效力,通过分析公司担保规则是否为强制性规则的路径存在着解释困境。形成担保决议系公司意思的形成行为,公司对外签订担保合同系意思表示行为,应在意思形成行为与意思表示行为分离的基础上分析背离公司担保决议规制的法效果。