纠纷及其解决:原因与路径的另一种思考

纠纷解决方能维护社会秩序之安定,而纠纷原因之探究则为纠纷解决研究之起点。基于对当代中国建构纠纷解决机制的宏观认知,尽管纠纷的发生往往与利益有关,立足于法律的视角,虽属于权利义务的现实分配之纷争,但从更深层次的意义来看,这种纷争或许与当事人之间的信息不对称存在着千丝万缕的联系。因而,重建当事人之间的信赖关系应是彻底解决纠纷、恢复当事人之间私法秩序的重要基础。     

日本ADR现状及其对我国的启示

选择性争议解决方式 (AlternativeDisputeRes olution)正在飞速发展着 ,对其研究也已成为一股热潮。在一些国家 ,对传统的法律诉讼非常注重而ADR则被忽略了 ,而在其他国家ADR被给予与诉讼相等的法律地位或者一个完全与诉讼不同的独特的法律地位。这就使广泛的国别研究显得非常必要 ,以提高我们对ADR的基本理解。     

论刑事诉讼与行政诉讼的冲突及其解决

为解决刑事诉讼中出现的行政问题及行政诉讼中出现的刑事问题,避免行政诉讼与刑事诉讼审理结果的冲突,应将两类诉讼中的相关问题分为本诉附属问题与审判前提问题,允许法院刑事审判庭在特定情况下审理行政问题;在对同一行为究竟应承担刑事责任还是行政责任难以确定时,以“刑事责任优先”为处理原则。     

涉检信访案件多元化矛盾纠纷解决机制研究

涉检信访制度作为重要的民主监督渠道和重要的权利救济手段,为维护社会稳定、保障群众合法权益发挥了重要作用。现阶段,检察机关着力推进规范司法,深入贯彻群众路线教育实践活动,努力以群众看得见的方式树立司法的公正与权威,但不服检察机关决定、不服法院生效裁判以及不服检察机关查办的职务犯罪结果等群众信访日益多元化和复杂化,涉检信访形势日趋严峻,处置难度进一步加大。因此,必须客观面对当前涉检信访工作面临的突出问题和发展趋势,釆取多元化的工作措施,逐步完善涉检信访的法律保障和工作机制,提高涉检信访案件处置成效,进一步发挥好其积极作用。     

Some Themes Arising from the Last Edition of Family Court Review

In the last edition of the FRC, there are a number of articles which highlight ever‐present themes in the many dispute resolution industries. These themes are: The cyclical nature of family law and DR reform to and fro “faster, cheaper, less formal and more accessible”; Access barriers for the poor and middle class; Access barriers due to geography, distance, and cultural differences; Blossoming of a range of “abbreviated” (short and inexpensive) DR services; The essential, yet neglected, task of systematic diagnosis of possible causes of conflict, and of a possible range of helpful interventions: DR practitioners should aim to “at least do no harm”; If a DR practitioner exhibits care, and core communication skills, how much do different processes matter? The Hawthorne effect—all pilot projects tend to succeed?; There is a constant flow of stories, systematic and statistical knowledge in DR industries. Who is listening and translating this flow of information between the various DR silos and to the public?

Key Points for the Family Court Community:
• The repetitive and predictable cycles of family law reform.
• Access to DR services restricted by finances, geography and cultural differences.
• The old saying “at least do no harm” should find a prominent place in all family DR services and training.
• The Hawthorne effect—all pilot and new projects seem to “succeed” for awhile. What follows?
• In the many family DR silos, there are “truths” embodied in stories, systems and statistics. Who can translate helpfully from one silo to another?

     

应收账款转让与应收账款质押冲突问题浅析

商业银行的资产业务不断地发展,传统的授信模式也随之发生改变,以往多以房产抵押或者信用为主,现今增加了担保措施和还款来源。应收账款作为还款来源以及担保措施之一也日益凸显重要性,在实际操作中,主要包括应收账款转让和应收账款质押。为了利益最大化,债权人可能重复处理债权,将债权同时用于转让和质押,以获得更多的融资的情形,二者并存时难免会产生冲突。所以,应从应收账款转让与应收账款质押的基础理论出发,分析相关法律关系以及并存现状,从而对确立冲突解决规则提出建议。     

完善多元化纠纷解决机制的法律思考

在我国现阶段,完善多元化纠纷解决机制必须坚持依法治国的正确方向,在宪法与相关法律法规的指导下来进行相关的制度建设,并不断推进相关立法工作。同时,要注意整合纠纷解决的本土资源和域外经验,处理好诉讼机制与非诉讼机制的关系;加强相关社会组织的建设,以提高非诉讼纠纷解决的公信力;培养社会自治能力,发扬自主、协商精神,形成非诉讼纠纷解决机制的社会基础。     

Jurisprudential Foundation of the Alogithmic Enforcement and Regulation of Law in an Intelligent Society: Taking the Automated Copyright Infringement Monitoring of the Online Content Sharing Platform as an Example

As cyber-space has become increasingly important for human activities, and intelligent algorithms are widely used in cyber-space, we are rapidly entering an intelligent society. Now, algorithmic enforcement and regulations of law have posed non-negligible issues. As algorithmic enforcement of copyright law was introduced earlier than that of other laws, it provides a helpful observation perspective. The worldwide practice of copyright enforcement has gradually departed from traditional “safe harbor provisions, ” and has emphasized prior examination of shared contents uploaded by Internet service providers’ (ISPs) users through the following three dimensions: automated infringement detection algorithms voluntarily used by the ISPs, heavier judicial liability of ISPs, and updated legislation principles. Thus, innovations and development have stimulated new mechanisms and regulations for enforcing copyright in cyberspace. Algorithmic enforcement of copyright law in an intelligent society is essential and meaningful. The copyright regulation mechanisms should be guided by jurisprudential principles and concepts featuring the principles of (a) legitimate and efficient flow of information, (b) balance between and among algorithmic power, public power and private rights, (c) boosting the sharing economy and the new gig economy, and (d) promoting social governance philosophy of “coconstruction, co-governance and sharing.” These principles are meaningful for creation of a new mechanism for balancing interests between ISPs and their users, and for introducing the pluralistic co-governance mechanism beyond simply practicing “filtering obligations.” In addition, these principles are significant for improving a certification with credibility of copyright status and ownership, and for advancing a mechanism for online collegiate-panel dispute resolution.     

试论涉股权离婚案件的正确处理

股份制经济的发展,使因出资而享有的股权走进了家庭财产,它也就当然的成为夫妻离婚财产分割的对象。但是股权本身不同于传统的财产,其所具有的多种属性对离婚财产分割提出了挑战,因而从股权特性角度出发探寻涉股权离婚问题的解决具有积极的意义!