正确处理文化产业发展中的几种关系

文化产业被喻为21世纪的朝阳产业,其发展潜力和重要地位由此可窥见一斑。在我国,文化产业起步较晚,各方面发展还很不充分。在其发展的初期阶段,尤其要注意处理好文化产业与文化事业的关系;社会效益与经济效益的关系;娱乐功能与教育功能的关系;开放搞活与法制建设的关系,使文化产业合乎规律地健康发展。     

关于我国文化安全问题的辩证思考

在全球化时代,我国文化安全问题日益突出。要用辩证的哲学思维方法联系地、全面地、发展地看待我国的文化安全问题,避免把它抽象化、简单化而陷于僵化、片面。     

论高职院校的“产学合作”

在现代科学技术和市场经济条件下,教育与产业的关系日益密切,高职院校与产业部门的合作已成为现代高职教育与现代产业改革与发展的一种趋势.产学合作使高职教育与产业部门在人才培养上、科技开发上、创办产业上优势互补,因而它是高职院校教育与生产劳动相结合最有效的途径.高职院校和产业部门要积极探索"产学合作"的新模式.     

跨文化传播时代的广告

广告文化作为文化传播的一种形式,必须为弘扬民族文化、实现民族文化的合理拓展作出承诺。从广告传播的角度来看,广告若欲将信息传递给目标受众,就必须采用本民族容易接受的文化形式和文化价值观。因此,在广告传播中采用民族题材、弘扬民族文化价值观的广告作品十分多见。这些广告表现了同一文化的亲和力,极大的唤起了消费者的文化认同,从而导致其购买行为,而客观上它们又弘扬了民族传统。     

Complex Individualism and Legitimacy of Absolute Property Rights

In this article my purpose is to go thoroughly into the ideas expressed by economists regarding the legitimacy of absolute property rights. I visit the Lockian argument taken up by Murray Rothbard (1.1) and the principle of the finder keeper clarified by Israel Kizner (1.2). I argue that it is impossible to legitimate either the property of the finder keeper or the property of oneself if man does not think of himself as an individual. Indeed individualism becomes the cultural prerequisite required to acknowledge the rights of the finder keeper and the goods obtained through labour. Here, Hayek's complex individualism is akin to the hypothesis of the social animal of Benjamin Constant and the work of Gabriel Tarde on the transformation of law. The individual is both an effect and a cause of property rights.     

继承法热点问题探析

长期囿于计划经济和简单生活资料生产束缚的中国家庭正经历着前所未有的变革。与之相适应,人们的财产继承观念也有了新的变化,这给当前我国的继承法带来了许多新的问题。立足于现实,从文化、经济的视角观察和评价当前一些继承关系中的热点问题,诸如洁手原则、自由选择权原则、遗嘱自由原则、文化对继承者资格的阻滞以及尊重习惯法原则,以期对继承制度的完善有所裨益。     

大学生消费价值观遭遇文化帝国主义

作为当代市场经济社会中不可或缺的人格素质要求,大学生的消费行为及其价值观的形成过程应当被视为一个全面的意识形态教育及其信念的建构过程。在西方消费社会的文化价值观连同其中的意识形态开始直接影响当代大学生的思想状况的时候,有必要适当调整大学生思想政治教育的视角,开展围绕着“消费价值观教育”的相关改革。     

中国警政近代化过程中的文化阻力--兼论落后教育的影响

作为宪政运动组成部分的中国警察近代化是以移植西方警察制度为基本路径的,但近代中国等级特权观念依旧牢固,个人主义依然发达,"官本位"观念仍极浓厚,教育水平也很落后,国民文化素质普遍不高,致使曾成为社会进步表征的中国近代警察很难有所作为.     

“中国特色”的文化学依据

"中国特色"理论的文化历史依据,可从文化中国、文化传统和文化实践的反思中得出.     

Modeling Facts,Culture, and Cognition in the Gun Debate

Can empirical data generate consensus about how to regulate firearms? If so, under what conditions? Previously, we presented evidence that individuals' cultural worldviews explain their positions on gun control more powerfully than any other fact about them, including their race or gender, the type of community or region of the country they live in, and even their political ideology or party affiliation. On this basis, we inferred that culture is prior to facts in the gun debate: empirical data can be expected to persaude individuals to change their view on gun policies only after those individuals come to see those policies as compatible with their core cultural commitments. We now respond to critics. Canvassing the psychological literature, we identify the mechanisms that systematically induce individuals to conform their factual beliefs about guns to their culturally grounded moral evaluations of them. To illustrate the strength and practical implications of these dynamics, we develop a series of computer simulations, which show why public beliefs about the efficacy of gun control can be expected to remain highly polarized even in the face of compelling empirical evidence. Finally, we show that the contribution culture makes to cognition could potentially be harnessed to generate broad, cross-cultural consensus: if gun policies can be framed in terms that are expressively compatible with diverse cultural worldviews, the motivation to resist compelling empirical evidence will dissipate, and individuals of diverse cultural persuasions can be expected rapidly to converge in their beliefs about what policies are best. Constructing a new, expressively pluralistic idiom of gun control should therefore be the first priority of policy-makers and -analysts interested in promoting the adoption of sound gun policies.