论道德错误的社会控制网络

道德错误的社会控制网络包括三个互相联系的主要纽结，即家庭、学校、社会。要充分有效地实现对道德错误的宏观制约，必须充分重视和发掘家庭、学校、社会与道德的关系和综合作用。     

Efficiency of 'Simple' Liability Rules When Courts Make Erroneous Estimation of the Damage

The literature on liability rules shows that the damage awards under a liability rule affect the efficiency of the rule. One crucial factor that could affect the damage awards and therefore the efficiency characteristics of liability rules is the error made by a court while estimating the harm suffered by the victims. In this paper efficiency property of what we label as 'simple' liability rules when courts make errors in estimation of the damage is studied in a unified framework. The paper provides a characterization of efficient simple liability rules and shows that the biased court errors act to change the efficiency characterization of simple liability rules. A necessary and sufficient condition for a simple liability rule to be efficient in the presence of upper-biased court errors is provided. The analysis is carried out in a quite general framework.     

阻却违法性事由错误的重新定性——以“假想防卫”为例

阻却违法性事由错误的问题在我国刑法通说上一直被简单地按照事实认识错误的原则来处理的,但是对于这个似乎没有太大争议的观念下依然有着一些值得我们重新思考的问题,比如关于阻却违法性事由的错误到底是否属于事实错误,以及直接按照事实错误的原则来处理是否真正合理。事实上这无法解决关于阻却违法性事由错误行为的恶意的共犯问题。以假想防卫为例借鉴"法律效果的限制责任理论",可以重新认识和解决阻却违法性事由的错误问题。     

略论会计法律责任

会计法律责任主要是指编造和提供虚假会计信息。在市场经济的条件下提高对改进会计法律责任的认识,明确会计法律责任的承担,对于会计信息质量的提高有很大的裨益。     

侦查错误中致错要素的结构化研究

在研究侦查错误的理论过程中,除了要研究其概念、界定标准等基础的理论之外,还要对侦查错误的致错结构要件进行深入的研究拓展。比如侦查错误致错结构要件中的主体方面的致错要件、主观方面的致错要件、客体方面致错要件以及客观方面的致错要件等。这样才能从更深的理论与实务层面把握侦查错误的致错过程,不但可以达到打击犯罪、保障人权的作用,而且还可以进一步使侦查工作与国际接轨实现其公正性、科学性以及效率性。     

Communication error management in law enforcement interactions: a receiver’s perspective

Two experiments explore the effect of law enforcement officers’ communication errors and their response strategies on a suspect’s trust in the officer; established rapport and hostility; and, the amount and quality of information shared. Students were questioned online by an exam board member about exam fraud (N_study1 ?=?188) or by a police negotiator after they had stolen money and barricaded themselves (N_study2 ?=?184). Unknown to participants, the online utterances of the law enforcement officer were pre-programmed to randomly assign them to a condition in a 2(Error: factual, judgment)?×?3(Response: contradict, apologize, accept) factorial design, or to control where no error was made. Our findings show that making (judgment) errors seem more detrimental for affective trust and rapport in a suspect interview, while no such effects appeared in a crisis negotiation. Notably, we found a positive effect of errors, as more information was being shared. The ultimate effect of the error was dependent on the response: accept was effective in re-establishing rapport and decreasing hostility, while contradict threatens it. Accept seems more effective for the willingness to provide information in a suspect interview, while apologize seems more effective for affective trust and rapport in a crisis negotiation.     

侦查错误的类型、原因与预防策略

错误是与参照标准、规范、预期不一致的观念或者非故意行为,而侦查活动具有求真属性、策略属性和规范属性。因此,侦查错误可以分为事实型错误、决策型错误（或策略型错误）、规范型错误。事实型错误的原因包括侦查人员的认知心理等因素;决策型错误的原因包括事实型错误、对规范的理解错误等方面;规范型错误包括事实型错误、决策型错误、偏见、过度追求事实真相等。根据不同错误的原因,可以提出相应的预防策略。     

“补正”个案比较分析与制度构建思考

补正是违法行政行为补救不可或缺的方式之一,在我国行政立法中却成了＂被遗忘的角落＂,学界也没有给予足够的重视。随着法治理念的深入、程序经济的提出和社会复杂性、多样性的要求,补正制度研究的意义变得十分重大。我国违法行政行为的补正制度的建立和完善需从两个方面同时入手,一是补正制度的建立亟须统一行政程序的制定,二是对行政复议法和行政诉讼法中的相关规定进行操作。     

外伤后诊疗失误医疗纠纷分析

通过对5例外伤后医疗纠纷案件的回顾性分析,探讨了此类医疗纠纷的特点和医疗失误的成因。通过外伤和医疗失误在患者死亡后果中责任程度分析,提出了“死因竞合”和“参与度”的判定原则。并且认为,在涉讼的此类医疗纠纷案件的技术鉴定中,如将对死者进行全面尸体解剖和病理学检验以明确患者死亡的原因作为必要的前置程序．则对于此类案件的科学鉴定具有非常重要的意义。