在我国建立以“假释为主、减刑为辅”的罪犯出狱新模式

我国重减刑、轻假释的现状源于刑法规定中的逻辑悖论,由此影响了减刑假释制度对罪犯更新改造、重返社会、预防和减少重新犯罪、降低刑罚成本功能的有效发挥,影响了假释的广泛适用,不利于监狱和社会秩序的稳定。我国应适当降低假释标准,提高减刑标准,以此来完善我国的减刑假释制度。     

固视性质分析在视力客观评估中的法医学价值

正常眼注视物体时固视点位于黄斑中心凹,称作中心固视(中心视力);而当眼底疾病或损伤导致视力障碍达到一定程度时,中心固视功能丧失,固视点位于黄斑中心凹外,称作偏心固视(偏心视力)。中心固视眼黄斑中心凹机能可因疾病(损伤)减弱,但视力下降有限;偏心固视眼黄斑中心凹机能则丧失,视力下降明显。对固视性质的分析有助于客观预估视力水平,本文复习相关文献,对固视概念、固视检查方法进行综述,并着重阐述固视性质在视力评估中的应用,以期为法医学视功能评估提供参考。     

Community In‐Reach Through Jail Reentry: Findings from a Quasi‐Experimental Design

Offenders face a number of significant challenges upon reentry into the community, including securing employment, locating housing, and accessing adequate substance abuse and mental health treatment. These and related issues, if neglected, only bolster rising recidivism rates which have prompted renewed interest in rehabilitation initiatives such as inmate reentry. Many jurisdictions have implemented programs designed to improve offenders' success after prison, but jail reentry programs are far less common. This study examined the effectiveness of one such program, the Auglaize County (OH) Transition (ACT) Program. Using a quasiexperimental design, recidivism was measured a year after release to determine if participation in the ACT Program was predictive of successful reentry. Findings suggest that program participation is strongly related to outcome success as was criminal history. Implications for correctional policy and suggestions for additional jail reentry research are considered.     

行政规范性文件绩效评估的技术性标准

行政规范性文件绩效评估的技术性标准是其评估标准的重要内容,其技术性标准主要包括形式结构技术的评价和语言表述技术。但行政规范性文件普遍存在着制定技术不符合基本标准要求的问题,如名称不规范、文件结构混乱、具体条款编排不符合技术规范要求等。因此,应当根据评估的技术性标准要求对行政规范性文件进行相应的完善,使行政规范性文件体系呈现为统一、协调的整体。     

加强大学生马克思主义信仰教育

在多元经济、政治、文化的影响下,我国当代大学生的信仰逐步呈现多元化的发展趋势,因此,加强大学生马克思主义信仰教育,已成为我国高校当前一项极其重要而迫切的任务。高校教师要从自身出发,做到思想和行为相统一,在教育内容的选择上做到科学和价值相统一,在教育方式的运用上做到原则和灵活相统一,在教育效果的考核上做到理论和实践相统一,从而使更多的大学生逐步树立马克思主义信仰。     

地方政府职能转变评估研究

政府职能转变是当代中国社会转型中的重大现实问题。对地方政府职能转变进行评估是一项复杂的系统工程,是促进政府职能转变的重要手段。对地方政府职能转变进行评估必须以科学发展观为指导,在厘清地方政府职能转变相关概念的基础上,构建起涵盖评估对象、评估内容和依据、评估主体、评估指标、评估结果运用等基本构成要素的评估框架。     

Considering the ecohealth approach: Shaping Haitian women's participation in urban agricultural projects

This paper examines the social and gender politics of a women's urban garden project supported by the International Organisation of Migration, in Cap Haitien, Haiti. My study highlights how the development process created an unmonitored symbolic space where society's normalised gender processes reproduced broader social inequalities, which, in turn, prevented the project from meeting the women's practical and strategic goals. Then, I discuss how the ecohealth approach, as an alternative design framework, could make symbolic space visible to be critically engaged and analysed by participants, to account for gender process, and create an emancipatory activity.     

我国公共部门绩效管理的历史与发展趋势研究

通过考察我国公共部门绩效管理的不同历史发展时期,发现绩效评估存在不同形式,也受到来自西方"新公共管理运动"的影响。目前,我国绩效评估存在与组织战略目标脱节、实践操作困难、考评结果未能反馈利用等局限,因此,建立健全相关制度保障和配套措施是当务之急。绩效管理要想获得更好地发展,提升组织竞争力,就需要向"学习型组织"转变和加强公民参与力度,从而为公共部门存在提供合法与民主性依据。     

Peer‐Reviewed Forensic Consultation in Practice: Multidisciplinary Oversight in Common Expertise

The fallibility of forensic science consultation is an ongoing and major justice concern. Prospective peer‐reviewed forensic consultation has over 10 years of application in American criminal and civil courts, adapting from the traditional oversight of teaching hospitals, rules of evidence and discovery, conventions of testimony of expert witnesses, and attorneys' overall trial strategy. In systematizing heightened oversight, this process ensures greater accountability in forensic science consultation. The integration of peer reviewers' complementary expertise and experience enhances the sophistication and overall quality of assessment. Forensic examination frequently involves the interface of different specialties. Multidisciplinary peer review augments expert proficiency with that of professional peers having different vantage points from relevant scientific disciplines. This approach ensures greater sophistication of a case inquiry, built‐in accountability, and streamlined processes when multiple experts are necessitated. Here, the authors present examples of several cases and the primary and secondary benefits of this collaborative, rigorous, cross‐disciplinary exercise.