江泽民军事论述的方法论特征

江泽民军事论述的方法论特征主要包括 :一是继承与创新的统一 ,在坚持以毛泽东军事思想、邓小平新时期军队建设思想为根本指导的前提下 ,着力解决新问题 ,迎接新挑战。二是全局与局部的统一 ,强调军事战略必须服从并服务于国家发展战略 ,军队建设必须与国家经济建设协调发展。三是整体与重点的统一 ,在整体推进军队全面建设的基础上 ,重点突出军队的革命化和质量建设。四是方法、过程与目标的统一 ,强调以科技为动力 ,以人才培养和发展武器装备为重点 ,以此实现我军的发展目标。     

面对挑战 民主党派如何更加有效地参政议政

新世纪为中国共产党领导的多党合作制度提出了许多全新的理论课题和更高的实践要求,各民主党派参政议政的内外部环境发生了巨大的变化。面对挑战,各民主党派只有从理论上端正认识、摆正方向,在实践中调整策略、抓住关键,从素质上加强建设、苦练内功,方能在新世纪更加有效地发挥参政议政作用。     

治理现代化视野下机关事务管理创新:从制度优势到治理效能

作为保障机关有序运行的重要制度设定,机关事务管理面多事杂任重,创新机关事务管理是实现从“制度优势”转向“治理实效”的重要一环。实现机关事务管理现代化,其本质是从“广度”到“深度”的深刻转变:新时代下的机关事务不再仅仅强调业务广度方面上的面面俱到,更期望其能在强化政府自身建设、优化政府职能等更深层面扮演积极角色。改革开放以来,我国不断推进机关事务领域改革,不仅仅是对其职能的不断调整,其本质在于对宏观行政体制变革的主动回应与渐进调试,是国家治理体系建构中的重要一环,并在此过程中逐渐形成职能现代化、体制法治化、行为职业化、能力智慧化等制度优势。基于行政管理要素构成的分析视角,职能体系、职权范围、管理体制、人力资源都将是创新机关事务管理的必要路径。     

略论律师业务垄断权

律师业务垄断权是律师业发达国家的通行做法 ,其在我国的立法确立是形成法律职业团体、规范法律服务市场、完善律师制度本身的需要。基层法律服务制度和企业法律顾问制度应纳入律师制度之中。本文对律师业务垄断权进行初步检讨。     

论公司人格否认制度在民事执行阶段的适用

在司法实践中已有的执行阶段适用公司人格否认制度的做法,引起很大争议。但在民事执行阶段中适用公司人格否认制度是必要的,这有利于解决“执行难”的社会问题,有利于维护社会经济的运行,有利于维护公平正义。现行立法存在着立法的空白,立法机关应当对此进行立法完善,在执行过程中适用公司人格否认,不但要起到保护公司的债权人利益的作用,也应考虑直接责任人的利益,要在两者之间寻求适当的平衡点。公司人格否认制度在执行阶段适用时,在程序上应坚持依法适用,要引入公开听证程序、赋予相关责任人要求复议的权利。     

群体性事件相关概念之界定

受不同的政治环境和经济、社会因素的影响,国内外对群体性事件的认识有一定差异,我国对群体性事件的认识也经历了不同的阶段。目前,有关群体性事件的概念就存在着集群行为、治安紧急事件、群体性治安事件、群体性突发事件、群体性事件等多种称谓。本文对国内外各种有关群体性事件的相关概念进行了系统梳理,通过比较分析的方法揭示群体性事件的内涵。     

Emerging US public affairs practice: the 2000+ PA model

Many larger US corporations are re‐assessing their participation in the public policy process and their entire approach to managing public affairs. This paper will attempt to synthesise much of what is happening to US corporate public affairs. It describes the forces driving the changes and addresses the ways corporations are responding to these forces. Finally, the paper offers an argument of the ‘New Public Affairs’ 2000 and beyond model as it will likely be practised in the USA, and perhaps elsewhere, at least early into this decade. Copyright © 2001 Henry Stewart Publications     

Public relations for public affairs

The term ‘public affairs’ has now become a much‐discussed topic in continental Europe's political and economic circles, including Germany and Austria. The problem is that few people really understand just what the term means. Many people have the impression that ‘public affairs’ is another way of describing lobbying. Others perceive it as classic public relations. In Europe many decision makers of the business world lack the specific knowledge of policy making; however, until now just a few such executives have taken advantage of the real opportunities opened up by using the services of professional public affairs consulting. Communications companies in Europe are now offering public affairs consulting as part of their services, with increasing success. The first task to make public affairs better known in Europe therefore must be public relations for public affairs. Copyright © 2001 Henry Stewart Publications     

Public affairs,issues management and political strategy: methodological approaches that count

This essay reviews the primary methods that have been used to study corporate public affairs, issues management, and corporate political activity (PA/IM/CPA). We identify three tractable areas of research in these areas: (1) the determinants of PAM/IM/CPA; (2) the effects of PAM/IM/CPA on public policy outcomes; and (3) the effects of public policy outcomes on overall firm financial performance. Despite the considerable difficulties in gathering data to test these phenomena, we posit that scholars have made progress in understanding some aspects of these relationships. Still, we conclude that the greatest weakness for the advancement of methodological progress is the lack of a theoretical model describing the PAM/IM/CPA process, which ultimately hinders the ability of empiricists to seek the ‘proper’ data to test such relationships. Copyright © 2001 Henry Stewart Publications     

Public affairs,issues management,and political strategy: opportunities,opportunities, and more opportunities

This paper begins where Professor Windsor left off and enumerates some other areas in which academic research could be profitably pursued for both intellectual and practical gain. The tone of Professor Windsor's paper is pessimistic, and lays out in detail some of the obstacles to research; but these are not insurmountable. Some key areas that can be explored to the benefit of researchers and practitioners are in self‐regulation, the initiative process, term limits (a relatively recent phenomenon and not particularly well known outside of the USA), and in alliance building, constituency statutes, and links to stakeholder theory and action. Each of these additional areas is addressed in this presentation. Copyright © 2001 Henry Stewart Publications