柔性管理视野下行政价值观的科学化

柔性管理先进的人文理念与管理理论导向如果引入到我国的行政管理领域,必然首先会对我国传统行政的上层建筑造成建设性的冲击,我国具有时代特色和科学内涵的行政价值观念的建构也可从中得到很好的借鉴。     

关于高职院校实施学分制和弹性学制的思考

学分制和弹性学制在西方已经实施多年,在我国起步不久,这种制度的优越性显而易见,以学生为主体,学制、课程设置都具有一定的灵活性,突出实践教学体系的重要性。现在各高职院校都在努力推行学分制和弹性学制,然而这种制度与我国一直实行的学年制差异较大,教育部的相关措施也并未配套实施,在有些高职院校这一制度流于形式。本文从学分制和弹性学制的实施角度展开论述。     

新加坡维护政治稳定的经验

新加坡维护政治稳定的经验无非两条：以压制政治参与和创设威权体制等为代表的刚性管制措施,和以渐进民主化改革、重视民意为本的政治系统平衡等的柔性治国,最终实现强制型稳定和自然型稳定的相得益彰,这对我国转型时期维护政治稳定具有重要的借鉴意义。     

软特性准稳定直流电源在电除尘器的应用及其前景

采用软特性准稳定直流电源作为电除尘器的供电电源 ,能够大幅度降低电场的能耗及除尘设备的投资。     

Flexible enforcement and fine adjustment

This paper considers the level of, and changes in, optimal noncompliance penalties under the following conditions: (i) where the regulator responsible for setting policy parameters, such as a penalty, is different from (and thus may have a different objective from) the regulator responsible for enforcing existing regulations; and (ii) where enforcement behavior changes from one in which enforcers are unresponsive to overtures on the part of firms to increase compliance to one in which enforcers are responsive to such overtures. The model developed shows that when enforcers “switch” from unresponsive to responsive enforcement, the optimal penalties for noncompliance need to be reduced. The analysis also gives insights as to what variables dictate the degree of penalty reduction.     

论公安机关对群体性事件的柔性处置

群体性事件基本上是人民内部矛盾。因此,公安机关在处置过程中,应最大限度地运用解决人民内部矛盾的方法和手段解决问题。本文首次提出了"群体性事件柔性处置理念"这个核心观点,阐述了其提出的理论依据和现实意义,论证了刚性处置手段和柔性处置手段在处置中辩证关系。     

柔性化处置群体性事件之机制设计

群体性事件是一种古老却依然炽热的社会现象。群体性事件的屡次爆发已凸显出在刚性体制内解决该问题的局限性。柔性化处置具有理论和现实的可行性。应该创新以人为本的政府管理模式,健全多渠道利益诉求表达机制,构建多元化纠纷解决机制,建立社会稳定风险防控和评估机制。还需坚持法治原则和慎用警力原则。     

Will working from home become the ‘new normal’ in the public sector?

The COVID-19 pandemic compelled large sections of the workforce out of their workplaces and into their homes to work. Many commentators suggest this has forever changed how and where we work. This article analyses how Australia's biggest employers – state and federal governments – approached the transitions to working from home, and back into regular workplaces. It considers the timing of policy responses to the pandemic as one indicator of resistance to, or acceptance of, widespread working from home. The article also demonstrates previous resistance to working from home for public servants, and questions widespread conjecture that it will become the ‘new normal’.