非法证据排除规则诉讼价值的冲突与抉择

非法证据排除规则应确立一个多元化的程序价值体系 ,在具备程序性价值和工具性价值的同时 ,还应尽可能地保证司法资源的合理配置。在不同诉讼价值之间发生冲突时 ,应不将实体真实作为刑事诉讼的唯一目标 ,也不再将“有罪必罚”作为刑事诉讼的最高目标 ,但同时应注意将排除规则对程序公正的追求和对当事人的权利的保护保持在一定限度之内。     

论法律的确定性之演变

法律以确定性作为自身追求的目标和表现形式。法律的确定性首先是其价值的确定性 ,其次是法律的形式理性。在不同的历史时期 ,公、私法在价值、形式理性上的确定性是不同的。自近代以来 ,公、私法在确定性上实现了一致。     

关于刑事诉讼中沉默权制度的思考

沉默权制度是西方诸多国家刑事诉讼程序中保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人人权的一项重要制度 ,是保障人类尊严不受侵犯的法律手段之一 ,是刑事司法公正的标准之一。在我国法学界 ,关于“沉默权”问题一直存在较大分歧     

邓小平的价值主体和价值评价思想论析

邓小平的价值思想内容十分丰富,是一个较完整的理论体系。邓小平的价值观是以人民为价值主体和评价主体的价值观。以人民群众为价值主体,是由我党的性质、根本宗旨以及人民群众在历史上的作用决定的。以人民群众为价值主体,必然要求以人民群众为评价主体,以人民群众的利益为评价标准。“三个有利于”价值标准,是以人民为价值主体和评价主体的价值标准,是以最广大人民群众的根本利益为评价标准的价值标准,也是科学的价值标准。     

关于"三农"问题的理论思考

只有改变原有的增长机制和发展模式,调整国民收入再分配格局,转换政府的职能,改革农村的治理结构,确立促进农村经济、社会、政治、文化综合发展的科学的发展观,并辅之以切实可行的政策措施,"三农"问题才能得到根本解决.     

Toward an Empirical Approach to Evidentiary Ruling

This paper responds to criticisms/misconstruals of our measure of the maximum probative value of evidence (D. Davis & W. C. Follette, 2002), and our conclusions regarding the potentially prejudicial role of intuitive profiling evidence, including motive. We argue that R. D. Friedman and R. C. Park's (2003) criticisms and example cases are largely based on inappropriate violation of the presumption of innocence. Further, we address the merits of our absolute difference measure of probative value versus those of the Bayesian likelihood ratio championed by D. H. Kaye and J. J. Koehler (2003). We recommend methods for presentation of measures of evidence utility that convey complexities of interdependence between new and existing evidence. Finally, we propose a probable cause standard for admission of potentially prejudicial evidence, dictating that admissibility of such evidence should be contingent upon other substantial evidence of guilt.     

Murder, Extramarital Affairs, and the Issue of Probative Value

A paper previously published in Law and Human Behavior by D. Davis and W. C. Follette (2002) argued that certain "profiling" characteristics commonly admitted into court have little or no probative value. They argued that this is especially likely to be true when the characteristic used as evidence (e.g., having an extramarital affair) is rather common in the population whereas the act in question (e.g., a man murdering his wife) is rare. Their analysis has prompted a strong response by Friedman and Park and by Kaye and Koehler with a rejoinder by Davis and Follette (all three follow this paper in this issue of Law and Human Behavior). This paper describes some of the nature of this controversy.     

略论王安石人才思想的当代价值

王安石的人才思想十分丰富 ,其“任贤使能”、“教之、养之、取之、任之”等人才思想对于我们培养、管理、选拔和使用人才有着重要的现实意义     

警察文化中的CIS

警察文化是社会文化中的一个特别部分 ,国家意志在警察文化的形成和变革中起主导作用。CIS是英文CorporateIdentitySystem的缩写。CIS一般称之为“品牌战略”、“形象战略”或“管理战略”。它由MI、BI和VI三个部分组成。MI是警察文化的理念部分 ;BI是警察文化的行为部分 ;VI是警察文化的视觉部分。在警察文化体系中 ,CIS属于管理战略范畴 ,它的约束力、影响力及其亲和性特别显著。规范与整合警察文化中的CIS ,对于提升警察文化价值 ,树立警察形象 ,推动警察队伍建设意义深远     

The New Water Legislation of Zimbabwe and South Africa – Comparison of Legal and Institutional Reform

Recently, several new pieces of water legislation have been promulgated in both Zimbabwe and the Republic of South Africa. The new acts are an attempt to correct injustices of a colonial past and to trigger development towards effective, equitable and efficient integrated water resources management influenced by the policy decisions in Agenda 21 and the need to respect economic and social human rights. This article aims at identifying and describing factors of prime importance in the process of legal and institutional reform. Major factors are earmarked and derived from the proceedings in Zimbabwe and are compared with the situation in South Africa. Thorough analysis by the author of proceedings, preambles, memoranda, legislation and addenda has induced roughly 5 major reform issues: The call for equitable water distribution based on a widely consented water resources management strategy; The need for effective and efficient integrated water resources management conducive to stakeholder participation through decentralisation processes; The redressing of legal shortcomings in former water legislation with the emphasis on the introduction of integrated approaches; The introduction of instruments of cost recovery for water resources management; The need to develop human resources capacity and institutional strength within the implementing agencies.For both Southern African states, these issues appear to be of comparable importance as major triggers for legal and institutional reform, although not always in the same sense.The resulting most important legal and institutional changes are presented, discussed and compared. Finally, prospects for and constraints on implementation of the new water legislation in these countries are compared.