政府决策失误的责任追究探讨

政府决策是政府行使国家管理职能的有效工具和手段,它在国家政治、经济、文化、外交领域发挥着巨大的作用。然而“政府决策失误”一旦酿成,轻则会给国家和人民造成重大财产损失,重则会造成人员伤亡。有权力即有责任,问责“政府决策失误”是建立责任政府和构建和谐社会的必然要求。     

Expert Testimony Pertaining to Battered Woman Syndrome: Its Impact on Jurors' Decisions

Participants (N = 200) were presented with a criminal homicide trial involving a battered woman who had killed her abuser. Within the trial, both the response history (passive, active) and presence of expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome (present, absent) were systematically varied. As well, half of the participants in each of these conditions were provided with a nullification instruction informing them that they were free to disregard the law and acquit should a strict application of the law result in an unjust verdict. Results indicated that, compared to the passive response condition, the mock jurors were no less receptive to the expert testimony in the active response condition. The impact of the testimony on participants' verdicts, however, was moderated by the nullification instruction. That is, although the presence of the testimony did result in greater verdict leniency, this only occurred when the mock jurors had been released from a strict application of the law. The implications of these findings are discussed.     

公共政策中的集团决策模型及在我国的适应性

如何制定出科学有效的、反映各方面利益并为社会所普遍认同的公共政策,是所有现代政府所面临的基本问题以及获得政治合法性的关键所在。通过描述社会政治现象,分析政府行为,探讨集团决策模型的起源、基本内容、主要缺陷及其在我国现实政治中的发展等问题,建立起公共政策决策中的集团决策模型的基本理念和分析框架,可为我国公共政策决策的科学化和民主化提供有益的思路。     

从沙尘暴防治看立法理念的转换

近年来沙尘暴事件频繁发生、社会危害严重,引起全社会的高度重视.我国颁布实施的《防沙治沙法》以防沙治沙为目的、被预期能直接应对沙尘暴,但法律治理效果甚微.这需要我们反思环境立法理念.从源头上看,沙尘暴的表现形式为自然灾害,但人类对自然界的严重破坏行为是原因的主要方面.因此相应的立法理念、思路和重点就必须重在对于人的行为进行控制,需要治沙但更为重要的是在立法中引入人地协调的理念.理念的转换带来相应的制度的完善,解决现有的防沙治沙的问题、实现其立法目的,其根本上还要在防沙治沙法中突破原有单项思维模式,引入综合决策方式.     

论保安处分：制度、反思与重构

保安处分制度源于19世纪的欧洲,具体包括决定制度和执行制度两方面的内容.目前,我国的保安处分制度一定程度上存在着决定制度合法性和执行制度合理性的问题.本文从保安处分的基本制度入手,分析了我国保安处分制度本土化和保安处分移植过程中存在的问题,在此基础上对保安处分制度进行了重构.     

违宪判决的形态

宪法审查的一个重要功能就在于保障宪法价值在法律体系中得以贯彻，然而仅仅将法律法规认定为违宪并不足以有效实现对法律体系的合宪性控制。灵活运用违宪判决的形态可以促使合宪状态的进一步达成，同时避免对政治和法律秩序造成过度的冲击。违宪判决的形态大致包括违宪无效判决、单纯违宪判决和警告性判决。违宪判决形态的选择方法和原理是政治智慧和法律技巧相结合的产物，对这些不同模式下的判决形态选择方法加以梳理、比较，并分析其背后的制度因素，可为激活我国的宪法审查制度提供一种可能的推进策略。     

Examining Factors Co-Existing with Interpersonal Violence in Lesbian Relationships

Interpersonal violence within lesbian relationships is a significant yet understudied problem. Women attending a gay pride festival in Atlanta, GA, were asked to complete a survey concerning same-sex interpersonal violence. Women who reported being in a current or previous same-sex partner relationship were included in the analyses (N = 226). Factors that occurred in the context of interpersonal violence were investigated: substance use, HIV/STI risk behaviors, barriers to reporting abuse, and attitudes inhibiting seeking of social support. In addition, the survey assessed relationship-related power dynamics. Results of multivariate analyses support the hypotheses that power imbalance and inequality when making sex-related decisions within women’s same-sex relationships are associated with interpersonal violence. Further findings suggested that a combination of factors must be considered when dealing with and reducing the risk for violence in same-sex relationships.     

邓小平领导决策取向问题探讨

决策思想是邓小平领导思想的重要组成部分。邓小平决策思想按其内在的逻辑顺序,可分为价值取向,目标取向和方法取向。价值取向是决策的前提和依据;目标取向是决策要达到的目标;方法取向是实施目标所采用的手段。3者缺一不可,共同构成了邓小平决策思想的完整体系。     

National parliamentary control and voting in the Council of the European Union

This article explores the different ways governments express dissent in the Council of the European Union (EU) through ‘No’ votes, abstentions and recorded negative statements. A game-theoretical model is presented that studies voting behaviour and analyses how the national parliaments’ levels of control over their governments’ EU policies affect it. It is concluded that governments that are strongly controlled by their parliaments are not more likely to express dissent. However, when they do express dissent, they vote ‘No’ more often. Parliamentary control depends on the presence of formal oversight institutions as well as the motivation of parliamentarians to hold their governments accountable. Empirical support is found in an analysis of votes on 1,387 legislative proposals that represent more than a decade of Council decision making in the period 2004–2014. This article contributes to the discussion on the involvement of national parliaments in EU affairs, and clearly distinguishes the different forms of dissent in Council decision making.     

论自动驾驶汽车生产者的刑事责任

自动驾驶汽车是人类研发、制造、使用和管理的智能产品,不是犯罪主体或刑事责任主体。在自动驾驶汽车自主控制状态下发生交通事故的,其生产者、使用者和其他人员难以按照我国现有刑法的罪名定罪处罚。除非道路交通安全法和刑法有专门的规定,驾驶位人员不接管汽车或接管后无力改变交通事故结果的,不构成交通肇事罪或其他管理过失犯罪。驾驶位人员的注意义务是阻止自动驾驶汽车自主控制下发生交通事故,其注意义务不应过高。允许的风险、紧急避险理论不能为自动驾驶汽车紧急路况处理算法的生产与应用提供合法、合理的解决方案,生产者遵守算法安全标准仅可以使生产行为合法化。鉴于现行刑法不适应自动驾驶汽车应用的特性,我国应当建立以生产者全程负责为中心的新刑事责任体系,使之在自动驾驶汽车生产和应用两个阶段承担安全管理责任,生产者拒不履行自动驾驶汽车应用安全管理义务且情节严重的,应当承担刑事责任。