历史流变中的民事诉讼证据种类

在我国证据制度发展的历史长河中,民事诉讼证据种类发生了两次重大转变。一次发生在清末修律之时,一次发生在新中国成立之后,而两次转变都是在直接借鉴国外相关理论的前提下发生的。我国现行民事诉讼证据种类是在第二次转变中借鉴前苏联有关证据制度的基础上建构的。从历史的角度对我国民事诉讼证据种类的演进轨迹进行考察与分析,对当下我国证据制度的改革有着十分重要的借鉴与启发意义。     

The Ubiquitous Book Review

If case-notes are considered to be a lowly form of legal literature, book reviews could come even lower. Law book-reviews, whenever themselves the subject of legal commentary, are seen to be done badly. Lacking the discipline of the legal opinion, law-book reviewing ranges between the pedantic and the perfunctory, with room for indulgence in the personal and the polemic. There are no established techniques for law-book reviewing. There are no criteria for critical appreciation. Law-book reviewing, which lacks any discernable ground-rules, proceeds intuitively without reference to explicit standards or established expertise. This is odd because the literary tradition of book-reviewing was first established by a lawyer whose concept was that of putting books on legal trial. The literary review is thus strongly grounded in legal method. The present shortcomings of the law-book review denote not only literary shortcomings but also failures of legal method. The conventional law review provides the evidence, no less than it carries much of the blame for the decline in law-book reviewing. One obvious standard of reference for the declining law-book review continues to be the higher forms of literary review. This standard calls for renewed interest in law and literature.     

传教士与中国近代法学

本文从西方传教士在近代中国从事的创办学校、学术团体、报刊杂志 ,翻译西方法律著作、撰写法律论著等一系列活动以及其成果入手 ,阐述了西方传教士在西方法学传入 ,中国近代法学观、法律制度和原则以及概念术语等的诞生 ,中国近代法学人才的养成等各个方面所起的奠基作用 ,并对传教士的这种作用的特点与历史贡献作了阐述。     

中华民族共同体与“新的历史性共同体”的比较研究

中华民族共同体是中华民族多元一体格局的发展结果,是新时代中国共产党开展民族工作和制定民族政策的理论基点;“新的历史性共同体”则是苏联对当时社会发展阶段和民族状况的过高估计。将这两种共同体形式进行比较研究,寻找二者之间的本质区别与内涵差异,有助于在实现中华民族伟大复兴过程中吸取历史经验教训,尊重人类社会与民族发展规律,铸牢中华民族共同体意识,共建人类命运共同体。     

台湾当局对大陆企业在台经贸活动的安全审查--司法机构的角色与功能

台湾当局针对大陆在台经贸活动的安全审查,以“台湾地区与大陆地区人民关系条例”为核心,构建起一套台湾地区宪制性规定、“法律”和“命令”相衔接的规范体系,落实对大陆企业在台经贸活动的特殊管制。台湾地区法院的司法审查,在概括授权的审查、安全标准的审查和比例原则的运用方面,未能发挥司法的纠正作用,反而在规范适用时创造新的安全规范依据,在司法审查标准上放低要求,为大陆企业在台经贸活动安全审查遭受显失公平的严苛处理做辩护。这不仅践踏法律基本原则,侵害在台大陆企业的合法权益,更会阻碍两岸经济合作发展,给台湾地区对外经济合作造成负面影响。     

秘密监听司法审查制度研究

秘密监听作为一种高科技刑事侦查手段,在侦查实践中被广泛应用。而我国目前对秘密监听措施的实施是由侦查机关内部审查批准的。由于缺乏外部监督,因而导致权力的滥用并使公民权利处于危险境地;将其纳入法典的调整范围并设立健全的司法审查机制,业已成为改革与完善刑事侦查措施的当务之急。     

国有企业改革30年的回顾与思考

我国国企改革已经进行了30年,既取得了巨大的成绩,也积累了宝贵的经验和教训。但是国企改革的任务仍未完成：建立和完善现代企业制度有很多工作要做;国有经济布局结构仍不尽合理;垄断企业改革任务艰巨;国有企业创新能力不强;改革遗留问题需要解决;国有资产管理体制有待改进。只要把经济体制改革和政治体制改革结合起来,加快改革行政管理体制、建设服务型政府的步伐,我们一定能胜利完成国企改革尚未完成的任务。     

Predatory journals and meetings in forensic sciences: what every expert needs to know about this "parasitic" publishing model

The emergence of the Internet has transformed all areas of society. This includes the universe of scientific publications, with several publishers now exclusively focusing on the electronic format and open access model while expanding to a megajournal scope. In this context, the pandemic of predatory open access journals (POAJs) and meetings are of grave concern to the academic and research community. This new shift within academia produces a variety of new victims; namely, the authors themselves. In turn, scientific knowledge is often discredited, with the public placing less trust in science. Now more than ever, performing research with integrity and selecting a journal in which to publish requires close attention and expertise. The "predatory movement" has developed increasingly sophisticated techniques for misleading people into believing what seem to be credible professional layouts and legitimate invitations. Initiatives such as the Jeffrey Beall's list, the Cabell's Scholarly Analytics and Think.Check.Submit offer some guidance to uncover the "parasitic" intervention of predatory journals and meetings, but specific education in this field is sorely needed. This work aims to review the main characteristics of predatory journals and meetings and to analyze this topic in the context of forensic and legal medicine research.     

民事诉讼二审发回重审制度的重新审视——兼评《民事诉讼法修正案》第40条之规定

二审发回重审制度是我国民事诉讼程序的重要组成部分。该制度在司法实践中显现出诉讼效益低、诉讼成本高、两审法院之间组织管理出现矛盾等制度瓶颈问题。新近施行的《民事诉讼法修正案》第40条对其作出了最新的修正,包括缩减适用范围、合理限定程序事由、规定使用次数等。但本次修法仍存在较大局限性,如对实体事由修正不彻底、未有效限制自由裁量权、对发回重审的裁定格式及拘束力未明确等。重新审视该制度并对之进行改良,可从明确规定法定事由、充分尊重当事人主体地位、增加救济程序以及明确发回重审裁定的格式及拘束力等方面加以探索。