对当代中国经济发展的回顾与反思

新中国经济发展呈现阶段性、周期性、循环往复性的特点 ,是在逐步摸索的实践中发展起来的。回顾反思新中国经济的发展史 ,我们可以得到很多有益的启示     

瞿秋白:中国马克思主义哲学传播史上承先启后的哲学家

在中国马克思主义哲学传播史的研究中,瞿秋白是一个不可忽视的重要思想家。他第一次系统地传播了唯物史观的全部内容,第一次把辩证唯物论介绍到国内理论界,系统传播了辩证唯物论的基本内容,第一次在宇宙观的意义上开拓了马克思主义的本体论研究。在马克思主义理论研究方面,瞿秋白也有一些不足之处,但哲学不足是历史造成的,丝毫不影响他成为一个中国马克思主义哲学传播史上承先启后的杰出哲学家。     

历史与想象——西方视野中的中国历史

从马可·波罗到伏尔泰,从黑格尔到费正清,从列文森到柯文,中国历史的图像在西方的想象中,随着其自身历史和中西交往的进程几经反复和变迁,价值评价也屡历颠覆。尽管如此,作为文化的异邦,中国历史对西方的吸引力始终如一。但对于这种富于想象成分的中国历史虚构“游戏”,西方也乐此不疲。这其中既脉动着对最终真相和合理解释的孜孜以求,更讲述着在广阔未知领域展开想象冒险的一次次奇妙航程。     

我国行政诉讼原告资格制度发展的社会背景及其得失评价——以最高人民法院2000年有关司法解释为对象

20世纪90年代是我国社会转型的关键十年。这一时期,市场经济体制逐步发展,民主政治体制逐步发展,行政法制建设不断进步,行政法治理论不断成熟。在社会变迁的大背景下出台的新司法解释对我国行政诉讼原告资格进行重新界定,转变了原告资格的价值取向,明确了不可诉行为的范围,赋予更广泛的行政相对人以原告资格。但新司法解释在行政诉讼原告资格的属人因素及属事因素上作出了限制性规定,有些规定甚至是对行政诉讼法规定的倒退。为使我国行政诉讼原告资格继续向逐步放宽的世界性趋势发展,最高人民法院在这类司法解释方面还将承担更为艰巨的重任。     

滥伐林木行为之行政法律责任评析

对滥伐林木行为追究行政责任时存在行政处罚的执法阻力较大,征收罚款的理论依据不足,行政罚款责任得来的资金的管理和使用不当等缺陷.本文认为,应当恢复民事责任、行政责任合理分界的状态,行政责任必须退出且应当完全可以由民事责任发生作用的领域;应当对滥伐林木行为人追究惩罚性民事损害赔偿责任.     

社会主义历史必然性的哲学思考

人类历史的社会形态是由低级到高级不断发展的过程.依照这个法则,资本主义也不可能是永恒的,它迟早要被社会主义社会形态所取代.社会主义取代资本主义是历史发展的必然产物,是资本主义发展的必然结果.     

瞿秋白与马克思主义中国化的历史进程

瞿秋白是我党早期最重要的马克思主义理论家之一，他对早期马克思主义中国化做出过卓越贡献。在他的努力推进下，马克思主义开始以系统的、完整的理论形态出现。他较早提出“革命的理论永不能和革命的实践相离”这一重要命题。他运用马克思主义理论分析中国国情和中国革命基本问题，并形成丰富的理论成果。     

晚年恩格斯哲学的历史语境与百年论争

晚年恩格斯在马克思逝世后对这位共同合作40年的挚友思想的权威解释形成了极具影响力的研究范式,他所构建的马克思主义哲学内在逻辑彰显了科学的唯物主义自然观和历史观的辩证统一,其中呈现的思维规律在很大程度上代表了马克思主义哲学的本质特征。这种思路后来遭到多种质疑,澄清这个问题,需要理解围绕晚年恩格斯展开的百年论争的实质,在历史语境中解读马克思和恩格斯的学术关系,进而在当代视域中理解晚年恩格斯哲学的广博性和大众化特征。这是促进马克思主义哲学中国化、时代化、大众化的应有之义。     

Family strategy of economic inequality among brothers in Korean rural society, 1690–1795

This article examines how inequality among brothers was practised as a family strategy in Korean south-eastern rural society from the end of the seventeenth to the late eighteenth century as a response to local economic changes. The Wolchon area experienced a process of downward levelling in this period. Using the household registers and land registers, the authors reconstituted 58 families with brothers who held land and 406 families who possessed nobi (‘serfs’ or ‘slaves’) for further examination. As a family strategy, most of these families attempted a strategy of unequal inheritance that resulted in maintaining high economic status for only one of the children among all the brothers. This child, in most cases, would be the eldest son, but also could be another son. The degree of inequality among brothers with regard to nobi-holding declined over time. Most families successfully maintained inequality, and through this family status, by efficiently practising the unequal inheritance strategy, while some families failed to keep the same level of inequality by the end of the eighteenth century. The degree of inequality among brothers is intimately connected to family property size. Each family sought its own strategy to suit the actual economic condition of the family. While very wealthy families attempted to give a similar inheritance to all brothers to provide an equal chance to each of them, less wealthy families reduced the survival chances of some children by the concentration of property given to only one child.     

The faces of death: regional differentiation in cause-specific mortality in the past

In mortality research, much attention has been paid to the strong geographical differentials in mortality levels and in modern mortality decline, as the analysis of this geographical differentiation might hold the key to explaining the determinants of mortality change. The use of historical cause-specific mortality data has proved a challenging, although very insightful, means to this end. The four contributions to this special issue focus on cause-specific mortality in the past, both to reassess older data using new insights and to challenge existing insights by using new data and methods. These papers, of which earlier versions were presented during the thirty-eighth Social Science History Association (SSHA) Meeting in Chicago, 21–24 November 2013, explore mortality at different stages of the life course, ranging from early infancy to old age. Moreover, each paper revolves around a different group of causes of death. Although the papers are in many ways rather different, together they demonstrate how different data, theoretical frameworks and methodologies can push the boundaries of research into the trends and determinants of historical mortality patterns.