Theoretical Connotation and Practical Direction of the Chinese Youth’s Historical Mission in the New Era

Since modern times, in the historical process of national liberation, Chinese youths have dared to shoulder the historical mission and made outstanding contributions in the history of modern China. Inheriting the historical mission entrusted by the predecessors and carrying the ideal of the Chinese people in pursuit of a better life, the contemporary Chinese youth is becoming a force that cannot be ignored in the practice of socialism with Chinese characteristics. Under the unprecedented material conditions and institutional advantages, only through “establishing lofty ideals”, “raising courage to struggle” and “practicing excellent skills” can the unity of ideality and reality be realized. Only by “loving the great motherland”, “taking the responsibility of the times”,and “refining moral character” can the unification of personal and social values be realized. Since the 18th National Congress of the CPC, with the continuous improvement of China's educational system, under the guidance of the socialist core value system, Chinese youths in the new era have begun to show patriotism, determination, diligence, moral cultivation, innovation, and pragmatism.This will certainly promote the contemporary youth to gradually grow into talents who can adhere to their ideals and keep pace with the times.     

防止政府脱离人民民主专政的国家本质--马克思主义国家学说的重要启示

代表最广大人民群众的根本利益,充分体现人民民主专政的国家本质,是当前我国政府体制改革的重大问题。确立人民群众在社会公共管理中的主体地位,促进政府与人民群众在公共领域的合作,是有效防止政府脱离人民民主专政国家本质的根本途径。马克思主义国家学说所揭示的这一基本原理,为防止政府脱离人民民主专政的国家本质提供了锐利武器。     

论侦查策略的发展渊源

侦查策略作为打击犯罪领域内的谋略文化,由于其涉及的知识领域非常广泛,因此,侦查策略的渊源是丰富而多彩的。侦查策略的历史之源:人类抗争谋略的发展成果,构成了侦查策略产生发展的基石;侦查策略自身的发展构成其发展的主线。侦查策略的实践之源:人们对侦查策略的认识产生于侦查实践的需要;其它社会实践对侦查策略的助益;侦查实践是检验侦查策略的唯一标准。侦查策略的科技之源,即对新科学、新技术发展成果的借鉴和应用,是侦查策略的重要来源。     

论刑事法的历史分析

历史分析，作为法学重要的研究方法之一，对于刑事法研究具有积极意义。对中国当代刑事法进行历史分析，并非去发现所谓的“民族精神”，而是寻找刑事法律制度得以形成的脉络，以及在法制演进中的政治、经济和文化因素。在刑事法学研究中运用这种分析方法，具体表现为历史比较研究、历史的社会研究以及历史的价值研究。对中国刑事法发展作历史研究，应区分不同时代，并有目的性地进行研究，进而挖掘其中可为当代刑事法发展利用的有益因素。     

Evidence for the role of the justice motive in status generalization processes

Status generalization refers to the capacity of status characteristics, such as race, gender, or occupation, to become the basis of social inequality even when such characteristics are not directly relevant to the immediate social interaction. For instance, individuals with positively valued status characteristics are more likely to assume positions of power and prestige than those of lower standing. To date, status generalization has been assumed to arise from stereotyped beliefs that associate positive standing on a status characteristic with positively valued personal attributes. Findings from two studies indicate that the capacity for status characteristics to produce power and prestige orders may also depend on people's need to believe in a just world. In the first study, participants were fortuitously granted a position of either superior or equal power and prestige to another person. Consistent with just world predictions, participants portrayed themselves more positively relative to the other on assessments of personal attributes when they occupied a superior position than when they occupied a position of equal power and prestige. Results from a second study showed that the tendency to link personal attributes with power and prestige standing was strongest for participants who scored high on the Just World Scale. Thus, just world beliefs appear to play a role in status generalization processes.     

A multivariate investigation of dating aggression

This study investigated the following variables for their unique and combined contributions to dating aggression: exposure to aggression in the family of origin (witnessing interparental aggression or being the victim of aggressive parenting); attitudes justifying dating aggression (when humiliated or in selfdefense); child-to-parent aggression; child sexual abuse; violent sexual victimization; alcohol use; and socioeconomic status. One hundred and eleven male and 179 female undergraduates reported on their own aggressive behaviors directed toward dating partners. Together, the predictor variables accounted for 41% of the variance in male-to-female aggression but only 16% of the female-to-male aggression. Humiliation, as a justification for dating aggression, contributes to the prediction of both males' and females' dating aggression, while self-defense, although a highly endorsed condition for justifying dating aggression, does not predict actual aggressive behavior. Exposure to interparental aggression plus the product between exposure and humiliation contribute to the prediction of males' dating aggression but exposure does not play a role in females' dating aggression. Violent sexual victimization contributes unique variance to both males' and females' dating aggression. The present data highlight the importance of examining specific circumstances under which males and females justify dating aggression and how such attitudes condoning aggression affect actual behaviors.     

毁损美术作品的刑法思考

故意毁损他人一般美术作品的 ,可能构成故意毁坏财物罪 :它侵犯的是复杂客体 ,行为本质在于使一般美术作品丧失效用 ,对象是一切属于他人的有经济价值的非文物美术作品、包括违禁美术作品。同时 ,有必要将通过毁损方式侵犯他人美术作品著作权、情节严重的行为 ,予以犯罪化。毁损文物美术作品的行为 ,根据主观过错的不同 ,则可能构成故意损毁文物罪或过失损毁文物罪     

Marital status and woman abuse theory

An area that has received insufficient attention in woman abuse studies is marital status. Although many feel that ending the marriage will end the violence, this may not be the case. An examination of National Crime Survey victimization data shows that most victims are, at the time of the interview, divorced or separated. There are reasons to believe that this is partially accounted for by the fact that many or even most women leave abusive relationships. If this is the case, then the traditional question of why women remain in battering marriages is improperly put. If most women do take appropriate steps, then we need much more information on both how women are victimized by ex-spouses and how women take active steps to improve their own lives.     

“人学”和历史唯物主义

就当下的马克思主义人学、人学的建构理念和途径来看,它们都没有摆脱历史唯物主义的核心范畴——实践的支援和支持。这样,最终使种种人学在运用“实践”来构建一种关于人的哲学体系时,根本不能与历史唯物主义的理论体系和观念相区别。所以,就目前中国马克思主义哲学研究来看,任何独立于历史唯物主义的人学建构或者试图将历史唯物主义范式人学化的企图都是一种不成熟和非法的建构。历史唯物主义范式的继续坚持和发展不能靠抽象的“人”本身来达到,而只能通过对现实人的实践活动中的问题表现来获得新的理论资源。     

析中国民族学北派和南派的学术倾向--以吴文藻、杨成志为例

中国民族学界在20世纪三四十年代就有了"北吴南杨"之说.北学派的代表人物吴文藻和南学派的代表人物杨成志虽求学、治学和教学经历不同,学术倾向各异,但他们对中国民族学的贡献都非常突出.比较和分析南北两派,凸显其与学派的关系,客观地看待两个学派的学术传统,师其所长,大有裨益,同时,有助于中国民族学研究的发展定向.