整合进路中的发展策略:伯克利学派的理论纲领——兼评《转变中的法律与社会:迈向回应型法》

伯克利学派是在工具主义思路和改革法制、解决社会问题的指向下探求一种规范主义的法社会学,力图超越自然法和法律实证主义的二元对立,重新整合法律、政治和社会的理论.伯克利学派的理论纲领主要沿着一种整合进路展开,其中所运用的发展策略对其法律理想类型的建构起着重要作用,但也存在自相矛盾:强调法律的"内在动力"而忽视外部条件;法律理想类型的构建与强烈的社会改革倾向之间呈现一种紧张,从而弱化了这一理论的有效性.     

现代化范式与中国法理学的"理想图景"

将改革开放30年来中国法理学的研究概括为“现代化范式”具有一定的合理性,对现代化范式不能简单地否定,它是中国现代化这一特殊时期的产物,对当代中国法治建设做出了重要贡献。但是30年法理学的发展存在着三对基本矛盾,即政治与学术的矛盾、普适性与本土性的矛盾、研究法律与尊重法律的矛盾。进入21世纪,中国法理学研究应当实现从过去简单地将西方作为中国法制和法治建设的榜样、楷模或标准的思维和研究方法向关注中国问题、用中国的方法来解决问题的研究方式的转变,确立中国法理学研究的中国意识。     

学习井冈山精神 加强理想信念教育

在井冈山斗争时期,共同的理想信念使革命队伍凝结为一个战斗集体,使星星之火终成燎原之势,创造了人类历史上的奇迹。总结井冈山时期的经验,在干部培训中开展理想信念教育,必须坚持以人为本的原则,要营造民主的环境、采用适合的教学方法和创设有效的学习机制。     

传统宗族观念的传承与嬗变——清代台湾社会螟蛉子风俗之探析

清代台湾社会的螟蛉子风俗甚为盛行,这与台湾移民社会的特殊历史环境有关。在社会普遍接受螟蛉子习俗的同时,螟蛉子仍处于较低的地位,这从财产继承的民间惯例可以得到反映;而政府的法律规范更凸显了螟蛉子的尴尬地位。尽管如此,政府在落实法律规范时仍不得不鉴于现实而作出调适与折中。这些都体现了传统宗族观念在台湾的传承与嬗变。     

支配、正当性与法律理想图景——读《中国法学向何处去》

支配与正当性之间的关系构成了《中国法学向何处去》一书讨论的主要脉络,从语义分析的视角看,在现代化范式与其批判之间,存在着二种不同的对中国法学研究进路的理解.对现代化范式批判的再反思,对中国法律理论图景的再认识,是推进这一讨论的最好方式.     

恩格斯关于工人群众理想信念教育的思想及其启示

恩格斯一生都很重视工人群众的理想信念教育.他认为:要使工人阶级通过社会主义道路解放自己,必须对其进行理想信念教育,使他们团结成一个阶级整体来为实现无产阶级和全人类的解放而奋斗;社会主义要从理论变成现实,也需要通过理想信念教育培养信奉共产主义理论的、有实践力量的共产主义者;在理想信念教育实践中,要注重思想政治教育和革命实...     

把握政治认知的形成特点搞好社会主义理想信念教育

政治价值制约政治认识,政治认识是政治认知的基石,政治态度影响政治认知,要把社会主义理想信念教育做得扎实有效,就得把它同教育对象的政治认知形成特点有机结合起来.     

Idealism,realism, and immigration: David Miller’s Strangers in Our Midst

David Miller’s Strangers in Our Midst is an important contribution to the debate among political philosophers about how liberal democratic states should deal with the issue of migration. But it is also a thoughtful statement concerning how best to do political philosophy and, as such, contributes also to the growing debate within Anglo-American political theory about the relative merits of ‘ideal’ versus ‘non-ideal’ normative theorising. Miller’s argument in the book builds on his earlier published work in suggesting that political philosophy should be ‘for Earthlings’: it should not be understood as a process of ideal theorising which ignores political reality. He argues that normative theorists should seek to resolve complex political problems by taking seriously the political context that makes these problems complex, rather than putting aside that context in the interests of deriving first principles. This is a controversial approach, which requires political philosophers to take more seriously than they often do the expressed concerns of citizens living in democratic states and the practical problems associated with applying normative principles in ways which actually help address the issue at hand. This piece discusses some of these themes, and the issue of migration more generally, in order to help frame the debate which follows.     

Democratic justice: the priority of politics and the ideal of citizenship

In his Democratic justice and the social contract, Weale presents a distinctive contingent practice-dependent model of ‘democratic justice’ that relies heavily on a condition of just social and political relations among equals. Several issues arise from this account. Under which conditions might such just social and political relations be realised? What ideal of equality is required for ‘democratic justice’? What are its implications for the political ideal of citizenship? This paper focuses on these questions as a way to critically reconsider Weale’s model. After presenting Weale’s procedural constructivism, I distinguish his model from an institutional practice-dependent model, one salient example of which is Rawls’s political constructivism. This distinction allows for a formulation of the social and political equality required for justice in each case. The contingent model assumes that an equality of ‘status’ will generate just social practices, yet it fails to recognise that an equality of ‘role’ is also important to ensure citizens’ compliance. The paper ultimately seeks to show that the contingent model is insufficient to ensure that just social practices will become stable.     

法律史解释:一种理解法律哲学历史发展的方式——读罗斯科·庞德《法律史解释》

对法律哲学发展所做出的历史解释是罗斯科·庞德在其著作中提出法律的社会工程学解释和建构其庞大社会法学理论的前提性预设.而庞德本人也在这一过程中实现了其在宏大叙事下的点滴努力.然而遗憾的是,这一方法却在过去的几十年里始终由于种种的原因而被研究者们所忽视.文中,作者采取一种思辩性的研究方法和一种批判性的研究进路来研究和审视一下庞德的这种历史解释方法以及其由此所考察的法律哲学的发展历程.写作目的不仅仅在于寻找和发现庞德法律哲学历史观的内在规律性和其理论脉络的转出以及其本身所固有的缺陷,更在乎寻找出对其理论进行知识增量意义上发展的可能性路径并揭示出其理论内涵对于当下中国法治建设所具有的问题意义.