质疑魔术的作品属性

我国法律规定的魔术作品是指魔术的全部动作编排,包括可以被观众感知的部分以及观众无法感知的部分。这两个部分结合在一起,共同组成一个完整的魔术,二者缺一不可。作品受著作权保护的要件之一是可复制性,可复制性要求作品能够被重复再现,从一份复制到多份。秘密性是魔术的生命力所在,这一点决定了魔术无法满足可复制性的要求。因此,魔术不能被纳入作品行列,可以利用商业秘密制度来保护魔术中未公开的动作编排。同时,有必要扩大表演者的范围,将表演者扩至表演非作品但具有公开娱乐性质的活动的人。基于此,可以借助表演者权来保护魔术演员的权利。     

窃听、窃照专用器材立法完善思考

非法使用窃听、窃照专用器材屡禁不止,对公众隐私、国家安全和公共秩序造成了严重侵害。究其原因,现有的法律制裁体系存在漏洞,惩戒力度不足,相关法律之间存在冲突。面对当前愈演愈烈的犯罪形势,有必要重新检视立法的相关规定,完善法律制裁体系。破解这一难题,首先,应当完善刑事制裁,修订《刑法》第283条和284条的相关规定,提升法定刑的幅度,增加罚金刑;其次,应将非法生产、使用和销售间谍专用器材以及非法生产、使用和销售窃听、窃照专用器材的行为纳入《治安管理处罚法》的调整范畴,同时,还应当探索对可能用于窃听、窃照的专用器材设定行政许可的可行性。     

Women Sustaining Community: The Politics of Agro-Ecology in Quilombo Tourism in Southern Brazil

This article analyses how a gendered perspective on community-based tourism (CBT) contributes to the realisation of identity and sovereignty of quilombos. It examines the potential sustainability of CBT coupled with agro-ecological practices within the context of gendered identity politics. Drawing from in-depth ethnographic and archival research conducted between February and July 2015 at Campinho da Independência (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), the article discusses how female leaders integrate sustainable agro-ecological practices and CBT with environmental education in what they call ‘ethno-ecological tourism’. This approach to CBT strengthens a proudly defiant version of Afro-Brazilian ethnic identity vis-à-vis the state.     

所有权制度的历史分析

从历史的角度看,没有哪一项法律制度像所有权这样承载着极为厚重的人文价值。人类社会从蒙昧时期、文明时期发展到近现代社会时期,所有权制度经历了从原始的财产支配到个人人性乃至社会整体的精神解放、从等级身份制条件下的公然不平等到形式主义的人人平等、从近现代的绝对所有权到现代社会兼顾实质平等的所有权这些重大的法律价值嬗变。所有权制度的有效性,是法律体系的核心目标,而有效的所有权制度,只有从认真对待民众的自然权利的角度入手才能够真正予以理解。在我国,解放民众所有权上的制度和思想桎梏、建立科学的公共财产所有权制度,应当成为我国进一步发展所有权制度的社会共识。     

中国秘密教门的渊源、现状、特征及对策研究

秘密教门是我国秘密社会的一种重要表现形式,在我国魏晋时就已经出现,且渊源流长。就目前而言,中国的秘密教门分为邪教和秘密宗教两类,且均有着各自的渊源和特点。国家对宗教有信仰自由的政策,为了社会的稳定,应区别对待邪教和秘密宗教,并有针对性地研究这个时代、特殊国情下如何应对秘密教门带来的问题,将秘密教门对社会的伤害降到最低。     

Where Do We Go from Here?

The left needs a fundamental rethinking of its politics for a new era. The first task is to understand the contemporary conjuncture: the dynamic combination of events and circumstances which structure a political settlement. Two such conjunctures have occurred in recent history. The first produced the postwar welfare settlement of 1945, which broke down in the economic crisis of the 1970s. The second took shape in the 1980s around the revival of liberal market economics and what became known as Thatcherism. It failed following the 2008 financial crash, and has begun to break apart with the vote to leave the EU. New political and cultural faultlines are confounding the orthodoxies of the governing class and cutting across the partisan loyalties of the main political parties. They herald the renewal of politics. But Labour is on the edge of an abyss. This article considers what the left can learn from Labour's previous periods of defeat and revisionism, and suggests where—if it survives—it should go next.     

A New Progressive Patriotism

The need to hold capital to account and to bend markets to the common good is as powerful as ever, yet it is becoming steadily harder to create an electoral or political majority for such an idea in societies that are fractured and divided. The fundamental bond between voters and parties depends on political identity relationships; old ones are fading, new ones need to be created. The most dynamic politics in advanced capitalist societies are those of nation, people and place. The strategic challenge for the left is to create a new progressive patriotism that can embed radical ideas in a common sense of national purpose.     

论我国对招标过程中商业秘密的法律保护

商业秘密具有实用性,能给权利人带来经济价值。各国法律都对商业秘密进行保护。标底是商业秘密的属性常常被忽视。我国为标底提供了严密的法律保护,通过保护标底不受侵犯,来有效地规范招标过程中存在的不法现象。     

论爆炸现场的救援和身份认证——以恐怖主义爆炸袭击为背景

恐怖主义是威胁当今世界和平的一个重要因素,目前恐怖活动在全球有愈演愈烈的趋势;我国在新世纪也同样面临恐怖袭击的威胁。爆炸手段是恐怖分子发动袭击的主要手段,爆炸现场的救援和身份认证是各国应对恐怖袭击的难题。本文介绍了恐怖主义爆炸案件的概念,分析了恐怖主义爆炸袭击常用的手段和现场的特点,借鉴以色列的经验,论述了现场救援和身份认证的程序和步骤。     

近亲属请求死亡赔偿的法理基础

死亡抚恤金是国家或有关单位按相关法规规定给予死者近亲属和被扶养人一定金额的慰问金及生活补助费,抚恤金代替不了死亡赔偿。死者已无从取得主张赔偿的权利,但法律不能无视利益受到损害的近亲属。基于身份关系的重要性,从亲属法的角度进行分析,应当以近亲属身份权被侵害作为近亲属索赔的理论依据,近亲属不仅可以向直接致害人提起死亡赔偿,也可以要求学校和政府承担起相应的责任,这样才能使近亲属被侵害的身份利益得到真正的救济。