我国不实行双重国籍的原因及解决这一问题的途径

近年来,要求我国实行双重国籍的呼声越来越高,是否实行双重国籍,取决于我国国情、邻国关系和国家利益的衡量取舍,要从我国的综合政治、经济和外交等国家宏观因素来考虑,不能仅仅为了跟随别国或照顾一个群体的方便和利益就放弃原来的实践证明是正确的立法原则。文章对我国不实行双重国籍的原因及实行双重国籍会对我国产生的影响进行分析,并提出了解决双重国籍问题应采取的措施和方法。     

民事案件审理中情与法冲突的利益衡量

情与法冲突案件具有普遍性,由于司法方法的缺失,审理此类案件存在较大困难。利益衡量是解决民事案件中情法冲突最为重要且有效的司法方法。在民事案件审理中,利益衡量的操作规则为实质判断加法律依据。实质判断的抽象标准是情理,现实标准则是利益的位阶;寻找法律依据的路径是法条的灵活适用、法律的解释、法律原则的运用等。     

Regulating the retirement age—Lessons from Nordic pension policy approaches

The likelihood that longevity will continue to increase has generated a search for regulation that make people work longer as they live longer, and thus not just containing pension expenditure but also enlarging labor supply, economic growth, and tax revenue. In public pension policy, Nordic countries have led the world with three types of approaches aimed at making people retire later. The first came when Sweden, followed by Finland and Norway, installed life expectancy coefficients in benefit calculation formulas. The second followed as Finland introduced age-related accrual rates and the third when Denmark indexed the pensionable age to developments in life expectancy. Since economic incentive-based regulations failed to raise exit ages sufficiently, Finland and Sweden subsequently linked pensionable ages to life expectancy like Denmark. While this policy brings out inequalities in health and workability, the fact that countries found it necessary to index the pensionable age to longevity instead of just relying on economic incentives in regulating retirement behavior may hold lessons for other countries.