刘少奇对马克思主义中国化第一次历史性飞跃的理论贡献

从马克思主义中国化的第一次历史性飞跃向第二次历史性飞跃转变的关键 ,是对“什么是社会主义 ?怎样建设社会主义”这个关系到社会主义前途和命运的根本问题解放思想、实事求是。刘少奇作为党和国家的主要领导人之一 ,是我党较早地对上述根本问题进行理论探索的先驱之一。他关于社会主义过渡的物质条件、社会主义的历史地位、主要矛盾、根本任务和体制改革等系列论述 ,较为准确地回答了上述根本问题 ,是对马克思主义中国化第二次历史性飞跃的杰出的理论贡献 ,是第一次飞跃向第二次飞跃转变的理论中介。     

Global Capitalism and the Transformation of State Socialism

The article outlines the footprint of international economic interests under state socialism, and considers in more detail the economic integration of the postcommunist countries into the world system in the post-1989 period of the building of capitalism. The focus of the article is on the extent of economic globalization of countries and their economic corporations. It is contended that the globalization of capitalist companies and the direct role of global economic forces had little importance under state socialism. Since 1989, policy in the former state socialist countries has been geared to “joining” the world system, optimistically its core. Important differences have developed between the postsocialist states with respect to economic penetration and exposure to the world market. The outcomes have not fulfilled the expectations of early advocates of transformation and entry to the world economy. Although the new member states of the European Union have entered the world economy as formal members of the “core,” they are not economically equal to the dominant “old” members of the EU. In all the postcommunist countries, there is an absence of large scale global companies, of comparable levels of innovation, research and development. Russia is a resources rich country, a “hybrid” social formation containing elements of state economic control, national capitalism, and global capitalism. I conclude that the semi periphery is not a transient category in the world economy; it has potential for persistence and renewal.     

传统文化因素对中国社会主义选择之影响分析

社会主义在中国的发生,有其深厚的社会文化和心理背景。没有在广泛的社会文化和心理土壤上滋生起来的与社会主义相契合的因素,社会主义———这个在西方工业社会产生发展起来的思想和运动,不可能在古老而落后的中国大地上广泛传播和发展,更不会建成现实的制度。     

准确把握社会主义核心价值体系的本质与精髓

建设社会主义核心价值体系,是党在思想文化建设上的一个重大理论创新,是我们党深刻总结历史经验、科学分析当前形势提出的一项重大任务。社会主义核心价值体系是社会主义意识形态的本质体现,社会主义核心价值体系包括四个方面,即马克思主义指导思想、中国特色社会主义共同理想、以爱国主义为核心的民族精神和以改革创新为核心的时代精神、社会主义荣辱观。建设社会主义核心价值体系,具有极强的现实针对性和重大的实践意义。我们必须充分认识社会主义核心价值体系的重要地位和作用,全面准确地理解社会主义核心价值体系的本质与精髓,牢牢把握意识形态建设的正确方向。     

毛泽东对建设中国特色社会主义的理论贡献

毛泽东同志是探索中国特色社会主义道路的思想先驱。20世纪50年代中期,他就对适合中国国情的社会主义道路进行了开创性的探索,提出了许多富有创造性的的思想,成为我们党的一笔宝贵的精神财富,从而为新时期我们党重新探索社会主义建设道路以及中国特色社会主义理论体系的形成奠定了重要基础。     

科学认识我国社会主义改革实践对人们思想的影响

改革开放,发展社会主义市场经济,对人们思想观念产生的影响,既有积极方面,又有消极方面。而在抓好物质明建设的同时,抓好精神明建设,兴利除弊则是我们面临的重要课题。     

人的全面发展:社会主义的最高价值目标

人类社会的发展是合规律性与合目的性的统一。人的解放和全面发展是社会发展的必然趋势 ,是社会主义的本质要求和最高价值目标。资本主义不可能从根本上解决人的自由全面发展问题 ,社会主义是实现人的解放和自由全面发展的必由之路。     

马克思主义中国化与社会主义现实化的“关系”、“问题”与“进路”

马克思主义中国化和社会主义现实化及其相互关系是一个复杂的理论和实践问题,也是一个不断趋向成熟的创造性的理论和实践相统一的过程。     

生态文明：中国特色社会主义的新认识

建设生态文明,是党的十七大重大的理论创新。确立生态文明理念,拓展了社会主义本质认识的新视野,丰富了中国特色社会主义事业的新内容,反映了时代的新要求,体现了中乱共产党对中国特色社会主义建设规律和人类文明发展趋势的把握。     

From Marxism to nationalism: The Chinese Communist Party's discursive shift in the post-Mao era

The Chinese Communist Party's dramatic shift from Mao Zedong's Chinese Revolution to Xi Jinping's Chinese Dream remains under-examined and even misunderstood or mispresented despite its enormous impact on every aspect of national life in the People's Republic of China. There is a clear need for in-depth analysis of the extent to which the CCP has departed from the philosophical foundation of Marxism and Maoism, abandoned socialism and communism, inverted its long tradition of iconoclasm, transformed its own identity and altered its subject position. Part of the CCP's philosophical departure from Marxism and Maoism is its increasing conversion to nationalism. The new nationalism underpinning the Chinese Dream, in particular, operates against the grain of Marxism and Maoism, and vice versa, and is logically irreconcilable with the latter – so much so that the CCP cannot be nationalists and Marxists, Maoists or communists at the same time. The contradictory logics between nationalism and Marxism can be best seen from their respective conceptions of permanence and change, the unity and conflict of opposites, and conceptions of, and approaches to, tradition and the past, which have had major ramifications in political-cultural change in post-Mao China, especially in Xi's New Era.