法检和谐--构建和谐社会的重要内容--浅论我国人民法院、检察院关系之冲突与协调

法检不和谐直接影响到司法机关司法职能的发挥,进而部分弱化了我国社会主义司法的功能,其危害不可低估.但目前,各级法检机关领导干部甚或党委、人大的领导同志,并未引起足够的重视,听之任之.针对我国一些地方存在的法院检察院两院关系不和谐现象,指出法检和谐是构建和谐社会的重要内容.法检关系的和谐,应当引起各级党委、人大、政法委、法院检察院领导同志的高度重视,从构建社会主义和谐社会的高度,深入调查研究,认真分析论证,采取切实有效措施加以解决.     

我国艾滋病行为干预的现实状况与基本评价

艾滋病行为干预是预防、控制艾滋病的重要技术手段,其内容框架主要包括对象、形式、目标、原则、措施等。近年来,我国政府通过采取各种各样的措施,广泛开展行为干预,积极应对艾滋病,取得了明显的成效,但同时也存在不少问题。要充分认识加强艾滋病行为干预工作的重要性和紧迫性,切实认真地执行艾滋病行为干预的政策规定,更加广泛、深入和持久地开展艾滋病的行为干预活动,加大监管力度,分类实施相应的行为干预措施。     

巨灾保险试点问题解析及对策研究

巨灾保险试点运营以来,在取得了一定的巨灾风险管理成效的同时困难也不断出现,因此,如何进一步推行巨灾保险,是一个亟待解决的问题.本文在论述以巨灾保险转嫁巨灾风险与自助、互助、公助的理念相契合,巨灾风险之"公众性"和"社群性"决定了巨灾保险政府介入的必要性和有限性,巨灾保险与大数法则的矛盾及其化解,巨灾保险试点运营存在的问...     

论葡萄牙法对澳门地区的影响历程

澳门地区现行法律制度以葡萄牙法律为基础。自16世纪中叶起,葡萄牙法律对澳门社会的影响逐步加深,至19世纪中叶,澳门社会基本奠定了葡式法律体系的基础。葡萄牙法对澳门的影响经历了三个时期,所产生的影响的态势及澳门地区独特的法律发展之路说明:不同民族的法律文化可以和平共存、共同发展。     

公安法制部门如何在基层基础工作中发挥实效

基层基础工作是整个公安工作的根基,加强公安机关基层基础建设,就是要用科学的发展观解决制约公安基层基础工作的突出问题,深入研究和不懈探索,努力开创基层基础工作的新局面。基层基础工作离不开法制工作,我国公安机关的法制建设虽然在“大接访”等活动中得到了长足发展,但是目前的公安机关基层基础工作仍然存在很多问题,法制部门要对此高度重视,在加强和完善基层基础工作的过程中,发挥出自身的积极作用。     

人民监督员制度的法治价值及其实现

人民监督员制度作为检察机关的一项重要司法制度设计,不仅反映了司法过程的民主性,也体现了司法过程的开放性和回应性.因而具有重大的法治意义和价值.因此,需要采取积极有效措施,改进和完善人民监督员制度,充分发挥其应有功能,以促进民主进程和法治秩序.     

司法工作人员渎职犯罪的检察监督

从检察监督的视角出发,实证分析司法工作人员渎职犯罪的重要特征,阐明司法实践中存在的突出问题和困境,揭示和分析制约检察监督效能发挥的制度性和技术性因素,并有针对地提出强化和完善检察监督的相关建议.     

Institutionalization of Children with Disabilities in Croatia: Social Workers' Perspectives

Abstract

This study aims to advance understanding of social workers’ perceptions of the circumstances necessitating and preventing the placement of children with disabilities (CwDs) in institutions. This retrospective study involved thematic analyses of one focus group (n?=?7) and semi-structured individual interviews (n?=?12). Participants included social work professionals with experience providing welfare services for CwDs and their families. In effort to prevent separation of CwDs from their families, results suggest a need for continued monitoring of deinstitutionalization of CwDs alongside increased availability, accessibility, and quality of childcare, alternative child welfare and family support services.     

Does it matter if those who matter don't mind? Effects of gang versus delinquent peer group membership on labeling processes

Despite renewed interests in the labeling perspective and the impact of official intervention on individuals’ future outcomes, scant attention has been given to potential conditioning factors for theorized labeling processes. We argue that, when viewed through a symbolic interactionist lens, variations in the nature of primary social groups, through which individuals filter official labels like arrest, may generate patterns for subsequent self-concept and delinquency that are contrary to what labeling theory indicates. To test our rationale, we offer a moderated mediation model in which gang membership is expected to differentially impact the effect of arrest on future delinquency through an intermediary mechanism: self-esteem. We test a gang–nongang dichotomy and then probe further to test whether hypothesized effects are gang specific or occur similarly for nongang youths with highly delinquent peer groups. Analyzed using Rochester Youth Development Study (RYDS) data (N = 961), comparisons between gang members and nonaffiliated youths with similarly highly delinquent peer groups revealed no significant differences in conditional indirect effects of arrest on self-esteem and future delinquency; the two groups were similarly insulated from any negative impact of arrest on self-esteem. For nongang youths with fewer delinquent peers, however, arrest significantly reduced later self-esteem, which in turn increased their future delinquency.     

Juvenile and Family Court Judges’ Knowledge and Attitudes About Sex Trafficking of Minors: Associations with Gender,Race, and U.S. Region

Juvenile and family court judges are a professional group that have a significant amount of decision-making power in cases of sex trafficking of minors. The purpose of this project is to examine the association of juvenile and family court judges’ gender, race, and U.S. region with their attitudes and knowledge about sex trafficking of minors. Drawing from a survey of 55 juvenile and family court judges in the U.S., this study used standardized scales to measure attitudes and knowledge about child sex trafficking. Results indicate some differences by gender and geography in a sample of experienced judges across the U.S. The consistency of these findings are discussed in the context of other research and implications for targeted training.