公司社会责任及其体系化设计的法学思考——以我国公司法的完善为视角

公司社会责任不能等同于企业社会责任。从法律层面或法学学科方面研究公司社会责任应立足于法律化的公司社会责任。法律化的公司社会责任可划分为广义的公司社会责任和狭义的公司社会责任、公司基本的社会责任和上市公司的社会责任。法律化的公司社会责任应在公司法上实现体系化．即公司法总则设置针对所有公司的社会责任条款,公司法分则设置专门针对上市公司社会责任的条款。     

论旅游景区经营公司治理结构创新

公司是旅游景区市场化经营的有效组织形式.旅游景区的开发经营涉及众多利益主体,旅游景区经营公司比一般公司肩负着更复杂广泛的社会责任.创新旅游景区经营公司的治理结构是强化景区经营公司社会责任、协调不同利益主体之间矛盾的一条可行路径.     

股东表决权刍议

股东表决权是指股东基于其股东地位而享有的,就股东大会议案进行表决和对公司董、监事进行选举的权利,是股东权的基础.股东表决权行使原则,行使方式有其特殊性.针对我国公司股东表决权行使中存在的问题,在公司立法上应建立股东表决权的代理行使、书面行使,表决权信托制度;禁止对股东参加股东大会加以限制;建立股东表决权排除制度,累积投票制度;明确对股东大会表决、选举结果的公证制度.     

Dysfunctional state institutions,trust, and governance in areas of limited statehood

Areas of limited statehood where the state is absent or dysfunctional are rarely ungoverned or ungovernable spaces. The provision of rules and regulations, as well as of public goods and services – governance – does not necessarily depend on the existence of functioning state institutions. How can this be explained? To begin with, we identify functional equivalents to state institutions that fail to govern hierarchically. Moreover, we focus on informal institutions based on trust that are endogenous to areas of limited statehood. Personalized trust among community members enables actors to overcome collective action problems and enhances the legitimacy of governance actors. The main challenge in areas of limited statehood, which are often characterized by social heterogeneity and deep social and cultural cleavages (particularly in post‐conflict societies) is to move to generalized trust beyond the local level and to “imagined communities among strangers,” despite dysfunctional state institutions. We propose two mechanisms: First, the more group‐based identities are constructed in inclusive ways and the more group identities are cross‐cutting and overlapping, the more they lead to and maintain generalized trust. Second, experiences with fair and impartial institutions and governance practices – irrespective of whether state or non‐state – also lead to generalized trust beyond the local level and allow for the upscaling of governance.     

Verbal Ability and Persistent Offending: A Race-specific Test of Moffitt’s Theory

Theoretical questions linger over the applicability of the verbal ability model to African-Americans and the social control theory hypothesis that educational failure mediates the effect of verbal ability on offending patterns. Accordingly, this paper investigates whether verbal ability distinguishes between offending groups within the context of Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy. Questions are addressed with longitudinal data spanning childhood through young-adulthood from an ongoing national panel, and multinomial and hierarchical Poisson models (overdispersed). In multinomial models, low verbal ability predicts membership in a life-course-persistent-oriented group relative to an adolescent-limited-oriented group. Hierarchical models indicate that verbal ability is associated with arrest outcomes among White and African-American subjects, with effects consistently operating through educational attainment (high school dropout). The results support Moffitt’s hypothesis that verbal deficits distinguish adolescent-limited- and life-course-persistent-oriented groups within race, as well as the social control model of verbal ability.     

关于国有控股公司的几个问题

国有控股公司是政府作为国有资产所有代表行使其出资权利的中间层次。本对国有控股公司概念、分类、成因及组建方式进行了探讨,并提出了发展和完善国有控股公司所应注意的几个问题。     

论我国一人公司的法律规制

随着市场经济和公司制度的发展,一人公司以自身的特点赢得了投资者的关注,并被许多国家所认可。一人公司已在实践中对我国《公司法》实施提出了挑战。实践中,一人公司大量存在,完全禁止绝无可能。为了我国市场经济和企业的科学发展,应从法律上对一人公司进行规制,确认一人公司的合法地位,并加以积极规范以趋利避害。     

我国公司并购法律的评价及建议

由于资本信用制度及法律的不健全 ,我国公司并购处于初级阶段。针对实践中存在的公司并购法律未与国情相联系 ,缺乏操作性 ;法律规范缺乏系统性 ,存在法律漏洞 ;在争议管辖上尚无明确规定 ;外资并购法规不完善等问题 ,提出制定统一《公司并购法》 ,完善要约收购制度、外资并购上市公司的反垄断制度 ,强化民事赔偿制度等建议     

公司法与公司治理结构认识误区

1994年我国公司法颁布实施 ,标志着中国企业改革进入了一个新阶段。但至今 ,人们对公司法与公司治理结构的一些概念和提法仍然存在着认识误区。由此带来改革实践中的种种不规范现象。使公司制改革沿着健康轨道发展的前提是 ,走出误区 ,从认识到实践克服种种偏离规范的现象。