公证法律责任及救济

《中华人民共和国公证法》规定，根据违法行为的性质，公证机构、执业公证员和公证当事人、公证事项利害关系人及其他个人或者组织应承担相应的公证法律责任。公证效力法定，公证作用越强、法律地位越高，随之引发的公证争议越多。《公证法》首次确立了公证机构的民事主体地位，各地公证机构被频频推上被告席，并由此牵出一系列问题。必须采取公证责任诉讼救济，保证合法权益的实现。     

建立和完善社区警务的保障机制

实施社区警务战略,必须建立和完善社区警务的保障机制,具体包括思想保障、警力保障、勤务保障、物质保障和组织保障等内容。     

由个案透视代位权诉讼的若干问题——国都财务公司诉华贸财务公司、永宏公司一案引发的思考

代位权诉讼制度确立至今已经四年 ,但由于该制度存在许多不完善之处 ,学界相关的讨论至今仍未停止。本文对代位权诉讼的若干问题作简要的探讨 ,在指出存在的问题的同时 ,提出了一些立法和司法建议。     

Reconstructing Insurance Law: The Law Commissions' Consultation Paper

In July 2007 the English and Scottish Law Commissions published the consultation paper Insurance Law – Non-disclosure and Breach of Warranty (hereafter LCCP) which sets out in detail the Commissions' provisional proposals for the reform of insurance contract law with particular reference to the key areas of utmost good faith, warranties and agency. This article analyses, from a critical standpoint, the LCCP's principal conclusions and recommendations. It begins by noting, as a means of demonstrating that the current reform process should be informed by modern industry practices, that the ways in which modern insurance contracts are concluded differ significantly from those when insurance law was last reviewed by the Law Commission in 1980. The article then discusses the dichotomy between consumer and business insurance given that this distinction underpins the LCCP and its approach towards reforming the pre-contractual duty of good faith. By way of backdrop to the analysis, we consider the approach taken towards reforming the law governing intermediaries acting for prospective assureds during the disclosure process. Finally, the proposed rules for warranties and similar terms are examined. It is argued that the proposal to retain continuing warranties in business insurance contracts will, if implemented, represent a missed opportunity to rid insurance contracts of terms long criticised as draconian and disproportionate in their effect.     

共同渎职犯罪主体身份与职务不同的定罪问题研究

共同渎职犯罪主体身份与职务不同 ,非国家机关工作人员能否成为国家机关工作人员犯罪的实行犯、教唆犯、组织犯、帮助犯 ,国家机关工作人员能否成为非国家工作人员的教唆犯 ,一直是理论界和司法实践争论不休的问题。凡利用国家机关工作人员职务便利的 ,应一律按国家机关工作人员犯罪共犯定罪 ;未利用国家机关工作人员职务便利的 ,则按主犯犯罪性质的共犯定罪。     

司法何以如此尴尬——以一起医疗纠纷案件审理为例

不断增多的医疗纠纷及其引发的种种愤懑,使得各种利益纠葛、体制冲突、伦理诉求和法律管制之间形成了一种较之从前更为复杂而微妙的关系。对医患关系的社会调查显示,目前我国医患双方的关系并不融洽,双方缺乏高度的信任感,一旦患者未达到其预期的疗效,势必为双方的矛盾、冲突和纠纷埋下伏笔;医患双方在具体运用知情同意权法则时产生的强烈的错位,使得知情同意权在减少医患纠纷、构建高度信任基础上的医患和谐关系的功能大打折扣。而对实践中的一个真实案例的审理的剖析则反映出我国法律和司法在知情同意权方面是如此的苍白无力,使得知情同意法则的建立迫在眉睫。我国知情同意权法则的理想构架应该包括:知情同意权法则的基本原则,医生的告知义务,患者的同意以及违反告知义务的构成要件。     

论社区警政之实践（节选）-台北县警察局实施单东保母服务之启示

近十年来在台湾的警察真的可以说是十分辛苦。在各种统计分析告诉我们 :犯罪发生率正逐步下降或未恶化 ;破案率不断攀升 ;交通事故发生也是逐年下降 ;秩序维持亦日趋良好。这些都得益于警察局实施的单车保母服务。单车保母服务队乃为了深入汽车巡逻所无法触及的治安死角 ,并增加警察与民众接触的机会 ,而推动步巡或自行车巡逻 ,尤其在商业繁荣地区更为适用。简言之 :以自行车为交通工具的执勤方式 ,所延伸的民众利益与日俱增     

深刻认识促进就业的长期战略

党的十六大把实现比较充分就业确定为全面建设小康社会的重要目标。为此必须实行促进就业的长期战略和政策。在今后20年间将城镇失业率控制在5％以内。发展是实现充分就业的第一要务和根本途径。解决失业问题是政府义不容辞的责任。政府要作为头等大事来抓,动用各种改革手段控制失业,消除非自愿失业。当前主要解决好下岗人员的再就业问题。     

Exit, Loyalty, and Collective Action Among Workers in a Simulated Business Environment: Interactive Effects of Group Identification and Boundary Permeability

Past research on the effects of boundary permeability and tokenism (open boundaries with restricted access) suggests that when options for individual mobility exist, members of low status groups tend to exit their group and attempt to enter higher status groups. We hypothesized that the effects of boundary permeability on preferences for individual vs. collective action would depend upon prior levels of in-group identification, such that people who are more identified with their group would remain loyal and choose collective action, even under conditions of high boundary permeability. To test this hypothesis, a 2 (High vs. Low Group Identification) × 2 (High vs. Low Permeability) experimental design was employed to assess preferences for exit and loyalty in the context of a simulated business environment. For both rating measures and behavioral choices, the interaction hypothesis was supported. Implications for group loyalty and strategies of tokenism are discussed.     

试论中医师的告知义务及违反告知义务的责任

由于具有独特治疗方法,中医在医疗过程中对患者知情权的保护也颇具特色,因此,中医师对患者负有的告知义务具有特殊性。中医师不履行告知义务,则应当承担侵权民事责任。由于中医师治疗行为的特点,其承担的侵权责任形态为替代责任,应当按照医疗事故损害赔偿的一般规则确定其赔偿责任。