从威权管制到社会治理——关于修订《大气污染防治法》的几点思考

我国《大气污染防治法》的修订正在进行之中,大气污染防治法的修订,仍存在一些有待解决的重大问题。除了基于气候变化问题对二氧化碳的规制作出回应,以及结合我国大气污染现状提出大气污染防治应引入分区管理制度外,现行《大气污染防治法》仍然呈现出以政府为主体,以污染企业为规制对象的单一化威权体制特征,其法律实施效果不佳,也不符合现代社会自我管制与和谐发展的要求。为此,需要加强市场激励机制的作用,为社会自我管制和公众参与提供条件,并基于行政责任和民事责任动因的不同,改变目前法律责任规定中重行政责任轻民事责任的现状。     

政府干预与市场调节之间的重新平衡——金融危机责任费的经济法反思与启示

政府救助金融危机容易引发市场主体的道德风险,如何在政府与市场主体之间重新分配责任,以纠正因政府救助所致的政府干预与市场调节之间的失衡,是后金融危机时代法律关注的重点。对大型的金融机构征收金融危机责任费,让其最终承担起政府救助成本有助于恢复政府与市场之间的平衡。金融危机责任费对市场主体权利义务的重新调整与责任的重新分配,突破了传统的法律责任理论,具有明显的社会性和身份性;而金融风险的外部性、大型金融机构与中小金融机构之间的不平等风险地位是金融危机责任费的风险根源。此外,它对于完善我国金融法制建设也具有重要的启示意义。     

Network neutrality: Issues for Australia

The beginning of the 21st century saw the beginning of substantial debate on “open access” to the Internet and the related concept of “network neutrality”. This paper is a short introduction to some of the complexities of the debate, focussing on the difficulties of attempting to regulate rapidly developing technologies, as well as particular issues of price and market regulation in Australia. Generally, network neutrality advocates believe that without regulation, telecommunications companies will use their control over “last mile” infrastructure to engage in discriminatory and anti-competitive practices against content providers. Opponents argue that this concern is illusory, and regulatory restrictions requiring neutrality will in their turn restrict innovation by network providers. In Australia, most discussion has focussed on price and market regulation. However, many Australian opponents of network neutrality say that it is an American problem, irrelevant to Australia, because of different pricing models for the Australian broadband market.     

证券市场操纵问题初探

我国立法始终重视证券市场投资者保护问题,法律明确规定“禁止操纵证券市场行为。”操纵证券市场行为给证券市场的秩序造成极大的危害,其直接侵害了投资者的合法权利。文章对操纵证券市场行为进行探析,并提出完善我国规制证券市场操纵行为的法律制度构想。     

我国银行业滥用市场支配地位的反垄断法分析

我国银行业的竞争日益激烈,然而又频频出现银行依据自身在特定条件下的优势地位损害消费者利益的行为,这种行为符合《反垄断法》规制的“滥用市场支配地位”的行为。银行业相关市场的构成应考虑产品和地域因素,市场支配地位的认定应结合我国的具体国情,判断滥用行为应正确区分合理正当的商业经营行为与限制、排除竞争的经营行为。     

竞争政策区域合作机制探析

Regional economic cooperation and multilateral cooperation of competition policies are regarded as two of the most important topics in international communities, both of which have a very close relationship, i.e., the former is an important path to the latter, and the latter is usually a critical topic of the former. Among the existing regional cooperation mechanism of competition policies are the three most typical modes, i.e., APEC’s open cooperation, NAFTA’s procedural law cooperation and EU’s substantive law cooperation. While taking initiatives to participate in multilateral cooperation of competition policies, China shall grasp the situation of current multilateral cooperation of competition policies, and follow the orderliness of its development, i.e., a step-by-step process of cooperation from nonbinding to binding, from domestic law to international law, and from fundamental to procedural law and to substantive law. Qi Tong, Ph.D, was once a visiting scholar in the Amsterdam Center of International Law (ACIL) (2006–2007). Now, he is an associate professor at the Department of International Economic Law of Wuhan University. His research interests focus on international trade law, international investment law, international financial law, international competition policy. His main publications include Regulatory constraint on transnational mergers & acquisitions (2006), Antitrust legislation on foreign M&A investments: Analysis on the antitrust rules in the Interim Provisions for Foreign Investors to Merge Domestic Enterprises (2004), Evolution of the pluralistic market regulation mechanism and its legislation (2005), On the positive comity of international antitrust cooperation (2005), International regulation mechanism and the new views of international economic law (2005), A legal perspective on the development of loan securitization in China (2006), A review on the case of Chinese measures affecting financial information services and foreign financial information supplier (2008).     

改革开放三十年我国法律本质理论的回顾

从20世纪70年代末期开始,中国进入了一个新的历史发展时期,中国社会内部的变革因素开始推动法理学和法律本质理论向前发展。法学界围绕法律的阶级性与社会性的相互关系,对法律本质进行了多视角、多层面的探讨,力图论证法律本质是正义性、阶级性、社会性和物质制约性的统一,主张用马克思关于阶级意志性和物质制约性相统一的原理、市民社会和政治国家相互关系的原理、法与法律关系的原理来深化和发展法律本质理论,建构与社会主义初级阶段相适应的、集自治性与开放性于一体的法律本质理论体系。     

确实发生了误读——与李昌庚先生商榷

从经济法、民商法、行政法与市场经济的关系入手,探讨在市场经济建立过程中经济法、民商法和行政法所扮演的角色,并论证“转轨经济法”提出的客观现实社会经济基础,对反驳“转轨经济法”的观点进行了较为详尽的正本清源,明确“转轨经济法”之所以在中国现阶段取代“市场经济法”来构建中国市场经济的原因。     

工会与就业问题研究

工会在理论上对就业的影响是模糊的,实证研究结果表明工会对就业会产生一种负面影响.就业形势的严峻,使得各国工会积极配合政府参与就业问题的解决,我国工会依法维护职工的合法权益,首先应维护职工的就业权.     

OECD国家积极的劳动力市场政策体制中的三方机制

积极的劳动力市场政策体制中的三方机制,是社会伙伴发挥影响的重要途径之一。通过对OECD四国的劳动力市场体制,可以得出如下结论:虽然由于经济全球化、工会影响力的消减,以及一定程度上由于三方的劳动力市场管理机构财力有限,政府加大了对它的参与,以致其原有的独立性原则受到了损害。但在制定和实施积极的劳动力市场政策过程中坚持有效的三方参与,从长远来说却会促进社会伙伴关系和组合主义架构的建立。