中外协议管辖制度之比较

与美、法、德等国的协议管辖制度相比,我国协议管辖制度在协议管辖范围、明示协议管辖和默示协议管辖等方面尚存在一些具体问题。应当借鉴国外相关制度中的合理成分,完善我国的协议管辖制度,协调法院职权与当事人处分权之间的矛盾,适应司法实践的需要。     

略论作为中国传统调解经验的儒家互惠原则

儒家互惠原则重视人类以相互承认为前提的仁爱情感的价值,注重当事人的长远利益以及双方个体利益的均衡,蕴涵着一种较特殊的利益合作机制,它是中国传统调解模式的主轴和中心,在构建现代和谐社会过程中仍有重要意义。     

行政协议的法律性质分析

我国区域经济合作发展背景下出现的行政协议是行政主体之间为实现合作,而在特定事项上互为意思表示一致达成合意的一种双方或多方行政行为。行政协议作为契约的一种,对签约主体而言,属于对等性行政契约,对行政相对人而言,属于抽象行政行为。     

离职竞业禁止协议的立法选择——兼评《劳动合同法》第23条24条之规定

离职竞业禁止协议由于涉及太多的矛盾与冲突,其效力一直受到国内外学者的关注和质疑。作者在分析了离职竞业禁止协议性质和各国立法的基础上,提出中国作为大陆法系国家,在当前法官素质不高的国情下,有必要在借鉴各国立法司法经验的基础上对竞业禁止协议作出更加全面的规范,以指导当事人的行为和司法审判实践。     

工会参与劳动争议调解的几个问题

《劳动争议调解仲裁法》对劳动争议调解作了一些新的规范:劳动争议调解组织由单一的企业内调解扩展到多元的社会调解;工会在劳动争议调解中的身份更进一步明确,调解组织调解的劳动争议范围也扩大了。《劳动争议调解仲裁法》的颁布实施,将解决长期以来在劳动争议调解中的一些难点以及工会在劳动争议调解中的尴尬地位等问题。但同时劳动争议调解仍有需要进一步完善的地方。     

民法典时代夫妻房产赠与纠纷中的司法判决冲突及解决

夫妻财产法律制度集合身份关系与财产关系两维价值,前者是后者产生的前提和基础。夫妻房产赠与纠纷争议虽呈单纯协约纠纷表象,实则关涉身份关系,现有裁判规则未妥善处理两者之间的关系。夫妻房产赠与协议的性质和裁判规则一直存在争议,其属于婚姻家庭法规定的一种夫妻财产约定,还是适用财产法的赠与行为规定,在司法判决中也存在大量同案异判现象。民法典时代,司法实践中婚姻家庭生活纠纷的解决既需在微观上审视司法解释的逻辑,又要在宏观上把握《民法典》各编的价值维度。《民法典》编纂中"民本"思想贯彻七编,确定了人身权利保护优于财产权利保护的基调。与单纯财产行为主体间的关系不同,婚姻家庭编强调夫妻间的忠诚、尊重、关爱及家庭成员间的"敬老爱幼"和"互相帮助"。解决家庭成员特别是夫妻间财产纠纷时,应优先考量当事人之间独特的身份因素和婚姻家庭的伦理价值,将夫妻房产赠与行为与单纯赠与合同行为区分开,纳入夫妻财产约定范畴。     

审视大调解

我国的大调解机制是适应社会现实需要、对人民调解理念进一步延伸的产物。它强调的是调解的多方参与、多种调解资源的整合,是社会各方力量共同参与、相互配合化解社会矛盾的一种工作机制。在我国,大调解机制的存在具有必要性和可行性,也具有正当性:它适应了我国社会转型期解决复杂性和特殊性矛盾的需要;顺应了法治发展的需要;缓解了法院的压力;在我国有着深厚的调解文化底蕴和丰富的调解资源;它既符合维护社会稳定、构建和谐社会的内在诉求,也符合利益诉求和正义价值的追求。     

Civic Fusion: Moving from Certainty through Not Knowing to Curiosity

Civic fusion occurs when people bond across passionate difference to solve a shared public problem. It requires bringing people close together under conditions that enable them to bond, even as their polarizing beliefs remain intact. In managing multiparty multi‐issue negotiations, public policy mediators help disparate, passionate parties negotiate actionable agreements. To achieve and sustain civic fusion, interested parties recognize and acknowledge confining assumptions and move through a continuum in which their certainty about each other and their presumed solutions is challenged and transforms to uncertainty and then to curiosity. They connect across common public goals and find mutual understanding and respect for the interests of others as they come to understand and accept the opportunities and limitations that are inherent to their complex situations. A steady stream of new understandings moves people beyond their long‐held perspectives to foster productive negotiations and build innovative solutions. Ultimately, the parties generate sustainable consensus agreements even as they retain their deeply held and often opposing values and beliefs.     

Traumatic brain injury,temperament, and violence in incarcerated youth: a mediation analysis based on Delisi and Vaughn’s theory of temperament and antisocial behavior

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with violent behavior. A possible key mechanism to explain the relationship between TBI and violence is DeLisi and Vaughn’s temperament-based theory of antisocial behavior. Accordingly, the current study investigates whether temperament – the combination of effortful control and negative emotionality – mediates the relationship between TBI and violent behavior within incarcerated youth. A non-probability sample of youth (N?=?227) incarcerated in two long-term residential facilities completed a comprehensive assessment tool that collected data on TBI, temperament, childhood trauma, substance use, mental illness, and a variety of demographic characteristics. Preliminary results showed TBI significantly increased violent behavior, adjusting for confounds. Then, mediation analysis found that temperament accounted for 54% of the total effect between TBI and violence. The study findings show the potency of DeLisi and Vaughn’s temperamental construct in explaining the relationship between TBI and violent behavior within a sample of incarcerated youth. The dynamic interplay between effortful control and negative emotionality appears to be an important mechanism related to violent behavior. Both temperament constructs should be the focus of future assessment and intervention among incarcerated youth with TBI.     

行业性劳动争议调解效率体系的法规范分析

行业性劳动争议调解的效率体系是影响其运用机会与效果的重要方面，其效率价值的关键又在 于行业性劳动争议调解与司法确认、劳动仲裁审查的衔接。基于现行的规范体系，由于司法确认与仲裁审查两 套机制的差异性表现以及司法确认中并行规则的安排，导致程序法理混乱、程序正当性不足、审查标准不一， 进而在客观上减损了行业性劳动争议调解制度效率价值，这些问题与立法分散、程序价值定位不清晰密切相关。 解决以上问题，应当将程序同质化作为解决问题的基本导向，改革立法分散且位阶低的现状，推动司法确认程 序“二元化”格局向“一元化”转变，推动司法确认与劳动仲裁审查标准的一致性以及修正程序的价值追求。