农民工医疗保险制度研究

农民工作为现代社会不容忽视的一个重要群体,其医疗保险问题日益成为各级政府关注的焦点。解决农民工＂看病难,看病贵＂的难题是社会义不容辞的责任。建立完善的农民工医疗保险制度不仅为广大的农民工提供了合理的社会福利,更有利于社会主义和谐社会健康有序的发展。因此本文从现存医疗保险制度的问题入手,通过分析问题产生的原因,提出适合我国国情的农民工医疗保险制度的模式。     

论侵犯患者隐私权的法律责任

患者隐私权是应当受到保护的一种人格权利,但在医疗和医学教学活动中侵犯患者隐私权的事件时有发生,以至于患者和医护人员对簿公堂,因此对患者隐私权予以法律保护具有重要意义。在医疗活动和医学教学活动中,如何保护患者隐私权、在法律规定上如何将个人隐私权作为一项独立的人格权加以保护,应进行必要的思考和提出相应的对策。     

论医疗人工智能的刑法问题

医疗人工智能是我国新一代人工智能发展战略的重要内容,有助于提高诊疗效果、降低医疗风险,但也存在局限性,无法完全替代医师,不能成为医疗行为主体和医事犯罪主体.医疗人工智能应用给医师履行充分说明告知义务带来了困难,应当合理划定人工智能辅助医疗活动中医师说明告知义务的边界,改革患者获取医疗信息的制度,充分保障患者的知情同意权...     

外伤后诊疗失误医疗纠纷分析

通过对5例外伤后医疗纠纷案件的回顾性分析,探讨了此类医疗纠纷的特点和医疗失误的成因。通过外伤和医疗失误在患者死亡后果中责任程度分析,提出了“死因竞合”和“参与度”的判定原则。并且认为,在涉讼的此类医疗纠纷案件的技术鉴定中,如将对死者进行全面尸体解剖和病理学检验以明确患者死亡的原因作为必要的前置程序．则对于此类案件的科学鉴定具有非常重要的意义。     

从“开颅戒毒”谈医疗机构医学伦理委员会管理的立法

“开颅戒毒”成为近期社会一个争论热点,卫生部对这一颅脑手术用于戒毒叫停,也引起了各方的不同反应。国际上对试验性医疗行为,往往都是由医疗机构下设的医学伦理委员会来决定是否实施或终止的,而在我国却是一个立法空白。透过现象看本质,笔者谨希望通过本文为我国关于医学伦理委员会的立法工作做些探索。     

浅谈我国目前法医鉴定体系、内容及程序

通过对目前我国现行法医鉴定体系的分析、分类,从体制上和法律地位上对该体系有一个明确的认识,以求解决法医鉴定在司法诉讼程序中暴露出来的不足和弊端,更好地为打击犯罪、惩治犯罪、捍卫法律尊严服务。同时通过阐述法医鉴定的内容和程序,可以使基层办案民警及其他司法干警、公民对其有一个基本的了解,使法医鉴定的工作更加公正、透明。     

对致命伤后行为能力的研究

人体受到致命伤后,是否有行为能力,行为能力的大小,是法医在某些命案现场中必须解决的一个难题。研究致命伤后的行为能力对法医命案现场勘查及尸体检验,特别是破案有重要的意义,这不仅有助于重建现场,而且对现场中某一反常现象能够作出合理的解释和分析。     

我国新型农村合作医疗制度及其实施过程的社会性别分析--以天津市大港区为例

本文基于天津市大港区实施新型农村合作医疗的实践,从社会性别视角分析了我国新型农村合作医疗制度设计和实施中涉及到的性别平等问题。本文讨论了新型农村合作医疗制度的建立对于农村妇女健康的有利影响,同时也指出新型农村合作医疗在具体实施过程中存在的社会性别盲点对农村妇女健康可能产生的不利影响。最后,本文建议在具体实施新型农村合作医疗制度过程中需要增强社会性别敏感,政府应采取积极措施,使农村妇女中弱势人群在以家庭为基础的新型农村合作医疗制度的实施过程中平等受益。     

The Politics of Immigration and Public Health

The Conservative party's recent proposal to introduce compulsory medical examinations for immigrants should it win the upcoming election marks a departure in the politics of immigration and public health. For many years, the public health impact of immigration was kept out of party competition and successive governments pursued a voluntaristic approach to health checks. In this article, I outline the political history of immigration and public health, and consider the implications of attempts to raise the subject onto the public agenda. I argue that recent developments militate against a calm and balanced approach to the genuine public health concerns associated with immigration, which threatens not only to stigmatise immigrants and stoke anti-immigrant popular opinion, but also prevent the development of effective policies. In particular, the introduction of compulsory examinations may create perverse incentives for migrants to circumvent legal channels and thereby actually increase public health risks.     

A Pretty Fine Line: Life, Death, Autonomy and Letting it B

The cases of Diane Pretty and Ms B. raise crucial issues about decision-making and autonomy at the end of life. Ms B. was permitted her wish to die rather than live permanently dependent upon a ventilator because her case was constructed as one about withholding consent to medical treatment, which every adult with capacity has a right to do. Mrs Pretty, however, sought active intervention to end her life. Requiring assistance to die, and claiming that this was her human right, she sought an assurance that her husband would not be prosecuted if he helped her. Her claim was rejected and the assurance refused. The cases prompt questions about the nature of autonomy, the influence of others and the different way sin which medical and legal decisions are made. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.