伟大抗疫精神与国家治理现代化的互动逻辑

在抗击新冠肺炎疫情的伟大斗争中,中国形成了具有深刻内涵的伟大抗疫精神。伟大抗疫精神不仅源于抗疫斗争,更源于国家治理现代化实践。深刻把握伟大抗疫精神与国家治理现代化的互动逻辑,对于伟大抗疫精神的充分弘扬与国家治理现代化的顺利推进意义重大。二者的互动逻辑在于,伟大抗疫精神与国家治理现代化相互联系、相互促进,伟大抗疫精神深刻启示着国家治理现代化,国家治理现代化又将促进伟大抗疫精神的弘扬,二者统一于中华民族承担“强起来”的伟大使命的实践。     

民族复兴战略全局中的中华民族共同体建设

当代中华民族话语体系中,有两个关键词语:一是实现中华民族伟大复兴;二是铸牢中华民族共同体意识。深入研究中华民族复兴与中华民族共同体建设的关系,对于创新完善中华民族话语体系具有重要意义。民族复兴的涵义是国家富强、民族振兴、人民幸福,三者统一于复兴民族走向现代化的历史进程。与此相应,民族复兴战略全局中的中华民族共同体建设,要开拓世界历史、国家、民族、国民四个维度以形成新格局。中华民族共同体建设要兼顾规模和效率,平行推进中华民族作为民族共同体和国民共同体的建设;要在国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的整体框架中,作出相关战略布局和资源配置;作为民族共同体的建设,要铸牢中华民族共同体意识,夯实各民族共同繁荣的物质基础;作为国民共同体的建设,要从全体国民和国民个体两方面,增加扩展中华民族共同体建设的国民维度。     

Three Modes of Thinking and Policy Orientation of Cultural Security

Three types of relations are entangled nowadays in dealing with issues concerning national cultural security on both the theoretical and practical levels: (1) the relation between one’s own culture and that of other ethnic groups; (2) the relation between advanced and underdeveloped parts of culture; (3) the relation between one’s ethnic culture and so-called foreign advanced culture as related to the previous two. Accordingly, three modes of thinking are likely adopted in handling issues concerning national cultural security: to antagonize one’s own culture with that of other ethnic groups, that is, taking the “me or you” attitude; to dualize cultures as the “advanced” and the “underdeveloped”, that is, believing things to be good if not bad, or vice versa; and to assert that the ethnic are the advanced, that is, taking the “only-megood” stance. It is a very demanding job to maintain national culture and to pursue cultural development at the same time. Only when cultures are grouped into those without distinction between the advanced and the underdeveloped and those with such distinction can the relation between the ethnic and the advanced be properly handled. With the former, it is essential to maintain the ethnicity of one’s own culture before the cultural security is safeguarded. With the latter, however, the pursuit of advanced cultures and the advocacy of the advanced part of a particular culture is a key to ensuring and safeguarding the national cultural security. Hence, it is important to enhance the public awareness of cultural security, and more essentially for the government to offer scientifi cally appropriate orientation towards cultural security and to frame related policies.     

论国际法所调整的利益关系--兼谈国际法的本质属性及其影响

国际法所调整的利益关系中,有国家利益、国家之间的共同利益和全人类的共同利益,但居于本质属性地位的是国家之间的共同利益和全人类的共同利益.国际法的共同利益性对国际法(学)诸方面会产生比较深远的影响,特别是对国际法与国内法相互关系的理论迷局的破解具有重要意义.     

略论中国共产党的民族理论创新及其重大成果

中国共产党成立90周年以来,立足统一多民族国家的基本国情,致力把马克思主义民族理论与本国民族实际相结合,在解决国内民族问题的实践中,不断推进马克思主义民族理论中国化,取得了理论创新的两大重要成果,即毛泽东民族思想和中国特色社会主义民族理论,构成中国化马克思主义民族理论的科学体系。党的民族理论创新成果不仅具有鲜明的中国特色,契合了中国革命、建设、改革各个历史时期的时代特点,而且显示了一脉相承、与时俱进、开拓创新的理论品格。     

National parliaments as guardians of subsidiarity： A feasible task or an utopist chimera？

Ensuring a better control and respect of the principle of subsidiarity is one of the most important and innovative goals of the Treaty of Lisbon. To achieve this goal, the Treaty introduces a mechanism which, apart from checking compliance of draft legislative acts with that principle, may eventually lead a draft act to be deleted from the legislative agenda of the European Union on grounds of violation of subsidiarity. Within this mechanism, a crucial role is attributed to the national parliaments of the member states. According to Article 12 of the TEU （the Treaty on the European Union） and the provisions of the Protocol to the Treaty of Lisbon on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, in case one third of national parliaments consider a draft act not respecting the principle of subsidiarity, the commission must review the draft. Additionally, for acts to be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, when the simple majority of national parliaments gives reasoned opinions on the non-compliance of a proposal with subsidiarity and the commission does not amend it, the council or the parliament may block any further discussions on that proposal, if they consider it to be in violation of the principle of subsidiarity. While these provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon have the potential to ensure a better control of compliance with the principle of subsidiarity and enable national parliaments to have a stronger voice in the legislative process of the European Union, the present paper argues that several factors may considerably reduce their expected positive impact. This contribution concludes by proposing some suggestions to enhance the functioning of the subsidarity control mechanism introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon.     

试论和谐宁夏构建中的民族宗教和谐问题

宁夏作为我国最大的回族聚居区,同时又是一个多民族、多宗教共存的地区,能否实现民族和谐与宗教和谐直接关系到构建和谐宁夏目标的实现。     

国家安全学基础理论框架构建研究

国家安全学基础理论的构建是国家安全学学科建设的重要组成部分,缺乏国家安全学基础理论的支撑,国家安全学学科就犹如沙滩上的知识大厦,毫无根基可言。深刻理解国家安全问题的内涵,以国家安全问题为导向,遵循“问题→过程→结果”框架构建国家安全学基础理论,可使国家安全问题、国家安全认知、国家安全体系、国家安全能力、国家安全行为、国家安全极限等内容形成严密的逻辑整体。国家安全学基础理论以国家安全问题为逻辑起点和主线,国家安全问题构成预防和化解国家安全问题的“过程”和实现国家安全的“结果”的前提和保障。在“过程”中,国家安全问题通过国家安全认知、国家安全体系、国家安全能力、国家安全行为等要素的组合及其应用,得到预防和化解。国家安全极限作为国家安全目标实现的“结果”,意味着国家安全是一种相对安全而不是绝对安全,追求绝对安全必然导致安全困境,最终无法实现国家安全的目标。追求共同安全是国家安全极限应有之义。国家安全学基础理论遵循“问题→过程→结果”框架来构建其理论范式不能一蹴而就,需要共同努力,不断深化国家安全学基础理论研究。     

从东北振兴迈向东北亚大同:试论东北振兴计划与“中韩港”合作

全球化时代的东北振兴不仅具有重要的中国国内经济发展意义,还有重大的国际和地区战略意义,"中韩港"三边合作,对于从东北振兴迈向东北亚大同,具有举足轻重的作用。自上个世纪90年代以来,朝核问题成为影响东北亚和平稳定的主要因素,在六方会谈框架下,中韩双方在维护朝鲜半岛以及东北亚局势的稳定方面积累了合作的经验,两国的经济联系也日益密切。在2008年金融危机背景下,中韩经济均受到不同程度的冲击,中国需要通过拉动内需防止经济发展势头中断,韩国和中国香港特区也需要寻找新的增长空间,而东北振兴计划能够为解决上述矛盾找到出路。中国东部跨越、中部崛起、西部开发都离不开东西和谐、南北合作。"中韩港"在振兴东北问题上的合作如果奏效,有利于吸引更多的国际资本流向该地区,从而为该地区的稳定繁荣打下进一步的基础,为通向东北亚大同创造必要的条件。     

新形势下中国图们江区域开发的机遇与挑战

2009年8月20日,国务院批复了《以长吉图为开发开放先导区的中国图们江区域合作开发规划纲要》,明确把图们江区域合作开发确定为"国家战略",[1]标志着中国图们江区域合作开发将进入一个新的发展阶段。这一新形势对中国图们江区域合作开发而言,既是机遇又是挑战。从近期东北亚地区政治经济形势的发展趋势来看,尽管不利于区域合作发展的因素仍然存在,但促进图们江区域经济合作发展的力量正在上升,可谓机遇大于挑战。[2]面对挑战,应超前谋划和运作,全力以赴把自己的问题先解决好,进而影响和辐射周边国家和地区,推进图们江合作与开发。