论犯罪智力手段

智力手段作为一种先进的犯罪手段类型，涉及的领域遍及社会生活的方方面面，由此带来严重的社会危害性。与传统犯罪中诸如暴力手段、权力手段等的不同之处，在于它实现犯罪的过程中带有明显的智能性特征，从而助长了犯罪的成功率，也加大了司法机关查处的难度。因此，只有加强对犯罪智力手段的理论研究，对犯罪智力手段相关内涵进行界定和把握，才能进一步推进智能化犯罪这一领域的研究和防控。     

法学研究中的概念分析方法

概念分析是现代分析法学的主要研究方法。概念分析通过区分概念和范畴的逻辑结构或必然与本质属性来探求我们的世界的某些方面的真。法学研究中的概念分析方法源于早期分析法学的分析传统和日常语言哲学。自H．L．A．哈特把日常语言哲学中的概念分析方法引入法学研究之后，这种方法在现代分析法学中得到广泛的运用。“法律是什么？”和“权利的性质是什么？”这类的问题必须借助概念分析的方法才能回答。概念分析可以用来探究法律命题的真。运用概念分析方法探讨法律的一般性问题是一种求知的体现。     

Preventing Homelessness for System‐Involved Youth

Too many youth and young adults find themselves on the streets, couch‐surfing with friends, in emergency shelters or worse, after exiting the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. In some circumstances, youth have had court hearings until their exit from the legal system, but those hearings have not focused on long‐range plans of youth and emergencies youth may encounter. In other circumstances, there has been little or no planning prior to discharge, especially for young people who leave the juvenile justice system. Courts can and should prevent, alleviate or end youth homelessness for youth who appear before them through strategies that are enumerated in the recently‐passed NCJFCJ resolution. This article expounds on three of these strategies – coordinating transition and re‐entry plans, insisting on effective legal representation of youth, and utilizing sound judicial leadership. It also describes the concurrent efforts of the Coalition for Juvenile Justice and the American Bar Association's Homeless Youth Legal Network to remove legal barriers and improve outcomes for youth and young adults experiencing homelessness.     

刑事诉讼视野下的被告承担举证责任法理分析

举证责任的分配则是整个刑事证明这一环节的核心问题,举证责任既是一种权利,也是一项义务,被告承担举证责任作为举证责任的一种分配形式,其性质显然是权利义务统一性。基于司法公正、诉讼经济与效率、犯罪构成要件外的事实等原因,由被告承担部分举证责任具有合理可行性。     

法律的"概念"澄明——评H.L.A.哈特《法律的概念》

日常语言分析哲学家并新分析实证主义法学的创始人哈特,在《法律的概念》一书中,从语词用法的日常语言分析入手,通过法律"游戏"中第一性规则与第二性规则之结合作为关键的"法律"概念纵向语境把握,以及"主权者"、"命令"、"正义"、"道德"诸概念讨论之"法律"概念横向比较,成功地将法律"概念"的理解由对于某种具有确定客观属性的法律实体的认识转向了日常语言层面的澄明,开创了一个全新的日常语言分析法学流派.     

成人高校学报模式探析

成人高校学报多采用普通高校“两为主”的办刊模式,忽视了成人高校自身的特征,抹刹了成人高校与普通高校的差距,带来了许多弊端,造成稿件贫乏,内容一般化,为评职称服务等问题。要办好成人高校学刊,就要突破“两为主”的思维定势,选择名人办刊,独具特色,育人为首,服务地方行业的新模式。争取领导的理解和支持,加强编辑的自身建设,确定办报目标,组织好作者队伍,多渠道筹措办报经费,使学报取得突破性的进展。     

治安调解的特性分析

治安调解是公安机关依据《中华人民共和国治安管理处罚法》处理违反治安管理案件（即治安案件）的一种特殊方式,它作为一种行政调解,具有涉私性、自治性、公力性、终局性、程序性等特性,不同于一般调解乃至民事司法调解,这对于准确理解治安调解的适用范围、法律效力,规范地开展治安调解具有积极的指导意义。     

关于政绩的政治学思考

从政治学的角度来看,政绩的依托是公共权力,其核心是公共利益,手段是现代管理,关键是科学考核,指向是政治合法。只有这样理解政绩,才能引导更多的从政者树立正确的政绩观,创造出更多有利于人民的政绩。     

Intensive psychological treatment of high-risk violent offenders: Outcomes and pre-release mechanisms

Research on correlates of intervention programmes that reduce expected reconviction rates (‘what works’ literature, Risk–Need–Responsivity model) has been highly influential in criminal justice systems throughout much of the western world. But while this psychological research has been acquiring widespread recognition, a deeper understanding of how programmes work and of mechanisms for desistance more generally, has still to develop. This research reports results of a quasi-experimental recidivism outcome study for a series of prison units that provide intensive psychological treatment to high-risk, persistently violent prisoners. Four outcomes were examined over the first 12 months following release on parole: parole violations, new convictions, new convictions for violence, and imprisonment sentences resulting from new convictions. Alongside these results, we conducted preliminary analyses of two potential pre-release mechanisms for surviving the first 12 months on parole without reconviction: lower dynamic risk for violence, and greater release readiness. We found that dynamic violence risk fully accounted for differences between treatment completers and comparison prisoners in proportions reconvicted for violence. However, in all other cases, the proposed mechanisms did not significantly explain treatment-related differences. We close by considering possible explanations for these unexpected results, and reiterating the importance to our field of more sophisticated treatment outcome research.     

Investigating Treatment Effects in a Domestic Violence Experiment with Partially Missing Outcome Data

This paper considers the problem of estimating the magnitude of a treatmenteffect in a randomized experiment where the outcome is missing for somecases. The primary concern in such situations is that the distribution ofthe outcome variable may vary in important ways between individuals whoseoutcomes are observed and individuals whose outcomes are missing. Since thedata cannot be used to resolve this concern, it is necessary to take theuncertainty that is created by the missing data into account when developinginferences about the magnitude of the treatment effect. This paper considersa modeling framework that accomplishes this objective. Then, the proposedframework is applied to a study of the effectiveness of different types ofpolice responses to spouse assault incidents in Charlotte, North Carolina.