论民事再审程序

民事再审程序是民事诉讼法的重要组成部分 ,我国民事再审程序由于受到前苏联的影响 ,职权主义色彩十分浓厚。随着审判方式改革的不断深入 ,我国现行民事再审程序存在的问题也逐渐显露。文章从民事再审程序的理论依据入手 ,较为详尽地分析了我国民事再审程序存在的主要问题 ,如指导思想不符合民事诉讼自身的规律 ,程序启动凸显职权主义色彩等。在此基础上 ,文章对完善我国民事再审程序提出了自己的理论构想。     

当前企业内保工作存在的问题及其对策

改革的不断深化 ,各种利益格局的调整以及人财物大流动 ,给企业安全保卫工作提出了新的问题。如何充分发挥企业内保部门的职能作用 ,切实做好企业内部治安管理和安全保卫工作 ,是企业领导必须面对和认真研究的问题 ,也是企业自身持续发展和提高经济效益的客观需要     

To Control Or Not To Control? The Need To Control Some Alien Species, The Effectiveness Of Legislation And Possible Future Developments In The Law

This article examines problems relating to alien or non-native species. These are sometimes a matter of grave concern and feature regularly in news items. Current legislation appears unable to control these plants and animals until they have become such a threat to other species that the only available action is to cull them, sometimes to the point of total eradication; a solution that is undesirable unless there are no other options. Therefore, relevant cases are studied in some detail to highlight potential loopholes in the law. Finally, the article considers important new developments in United Kingdom legislation and suggests some possible amendments further to ameliorate the situation. Bridget Martin is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the Lancashire Law School.     

民事诉讼非法证据的排除

民事诉讼非法证据排除规则在适用中有三个程序问题需要解决——依当事人申请排除还是由法官依职权排除,合法性发生争议时证明责任由哪一方当事人负担,法院在诉讼中的哪个阶段做出排除与否的决定。民事诉讼的根本目的是在发现真实的基础上适用实体法规则解决纠纷,为实现此根本目的,同时也为了与诉讼效率、程序安定的目标相协调,宜设置当事人对合法性提出质疑后法院再来审查证据是否合法取得,合法性发生争议时由异议者对收集证据的非法性负证明责任,排除非法证据的决定在对各种相关权益和因素进行权衡后的判决阶段做出的程序规则。应当采用利益衡量的方法决定是否排除非法证据,并据此对非法证据排除规则进行重构。     

村民自治面临的困境及其破解

村民自治作为最基层民主政治实践形式,在促进新农村建设及乡村善治方面发挥了极为重要的作用。同时也要看到,随着村民自治的不断深入,一些深层次的问题日益暴露出来,如基层干部整体素质不高、村委会选举欠缺公平、村民议事机构未能有效发挥作用、相关制度在落实中变形走样等,制约和阻碍了村民自治的进一步发展。为此,相关部门在实践中应提高村民民主参与意识,提升村干部能力素质,完善议事机构及相关制度,理顺乡镇与村及村"两委"之间的关系,使村民自治沿着良性轨道健康推进。     

Can you keep a secret? Introducing the RT-based Concealed Information Test to children

The present study validates a novel version of the Reaction time-based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) adapted for young children (7–10 years). Their ability to deny the possession of relevant information was related to individual differences in intelligence, processing speed, executive functioning and affective problems. The comparison between the knowledgeable group of children (N = 84) who took part in a mock surprise scenario and the unknowledgeable group (N = 78) indicated that by early school-age the RT-CIT can be considered a relatively reliable diagnostic tool for detecting concealed information. We found evidence indicating that executive functions are predictors of children's proficiency in concealing information; however, the specific interrelations were complex (children with lower inhibition and spatial working memory, but with better shifting performance were easier to detect as possessing concealed information). Finally, we found limited evidence for a substantial association between parent-reported emotional problems and children's proficiency in concealing information. This investigation has practical implications for the development of rigorous protocols to detect children's concealed knowledge within legal environments.     

新形势下个案矫正的创新与发展

目前首都监狱开展的个案矫正虽取得一定成效,但由于受各种因素制约,存在一些不足与缺陷,影响了个案矫正的合理开展和效果。本文从个案矫正出现的问题,分析原因,提出创新与发展的措施,以期进一步完善个案矫正工作。     

论民生视角下责任政府的构建

民生问题是一切文明社会所共同关注的问题,也是国家发展进程中的根本性问题。关注民生、重视民生、保障民生、改善民生是政府必须承担的责任。要解决好现阶段的民生问题,必须把握正确的政府责任导向,建设一个集阳光政府、有限政府、法治政府、诚信政府、亲民政府、民主政府、自律政府、和谐政府、服务政府综合交叉的善治政府。     

群众路线在检察工作中实践途径的探讨

群众路线是一种以人民的根本利益为归依的价值取向。坚持群众路线,是推动检察工作不断深入发展的重要措施和保障。文章从群众路线对检察工作的基本要求入手,分析了当前检察工作在贯彻群众路线中存在的主要问题,探讨了具体的群众路线在检察工作中实践途径。     

医疗干涉权的法理分析

医疗干涉权作为医生的一项职业特权，因李丽云案件而引起广泛关注。对医疗干涉权的准确界定是前提条件；医疗干涉权的适用条件与原则是基础；目前我国医疗干涉权的行使存在着与患者知情同意权的对立，法律与伦理的冲突以及法律适用弊端等问题；应该从行使主体、社会环境、立法体制等方面加以改革和完善。