计算机软件、软件复制品、电磁记录之保护与计算机信息交易立法——从盗窃腾讯QQ号码案说起

腾讯QQ是一种具有即时通讯功能的计算机软件，和软件复制产品、电磁记录一样都属于计算机信息。盗窃腾讯QQ号码的实质是盗窃腾讯QQ软件复制品。计算机软件是著作权法的客体，而作为无体物的软件复制品和电磁记录却不能构成物权法的客体，只能视为动产给予保护。我国应该借鉴美国统一计算机信息交易法的立法经验，加紧制定计算机信息交易法以规范计算机信息交易，填补相关法律漏洞。     

网络会计信息安全刍议

本文简要介绍了网络会计信息的基本特点,具体分析了网络会计信息的不安全因素及其危害,深入剖析了网络会计 信息风险的成因,并有针对性地提出了相应的防范对策。     

论禁毒情报调研成果的评估及利用

对禁毒情报调查研究的成果进行评估,是对调研获得的情报的内在质量所作的审核、评价,以便更好体现禁毒情报的价值。其评估内容表现在:真实性和有效性;评估方法主要有:分析与综合的方法,归纳与演绎的方法,比较的方法,“人、事、物”联系方法以及提出假设的方法。禁毒情报调研成果的利用主要是:为社会治安综合治理提供依据;为制定打击、预防毒品违法犯罪对策提供依据等七个方面。     

Personal values and value congruence of public administration graduate students: An exploratory study in China

Explorations on the value profiles of current and prospective public organisation employees in China are scarce. The current study investigates this critical issue. Data were collected via a questionnaire from graduate students enrolled in a school of public administration in China. The sample consisted of both full‐time students who were prepared to pursue their careers in public organisations upon graduation, and part‐time students who were mostly public organisation employees. Multivariate analyses of covariance (MANCOVAs) and analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) were used for data analysis. The results show that there are consistent value preferences among all students, and some noteworthy patterns in the relationship between value profiles and demographic and work‐related features. The results also shed light on whether a unique value set could differentiate various types of organisations, and demonstrate that employees in the core public service perceive higher level of value congruence than those in parapublic sectors. These findings provide implications and insights for the management practices in public organisations.     

传播要素视角下网络衍生舆情成因的多维分析

衍生舆情是近年来网络舆情所呈现的新特点,尤其由突发公共事件引发的网络舆情,衍生舆情的出现几乎成为一种必然,其所造成的“二次影响”甚至超过原生舆情,给舆情危机的防范和应对带来了更大的挑战。基于此,从传播要素的视角探讨在由突发公共事件引发网络舆情中出现衍生舆情的成因。研究认为,突发公共事件是衍生舆情出现的前提,其模糊性、关联性和刺激性会对衍生舆情产生直接影响;政府、媒体和公众是衍生舆情形成的重要因素,在信息传播中它们基于各自利益诉求而呈现的不同行为逻辑是衍生舆情产生的根本原因。     

Opaque transparency: How material affordances shape intermediary work

How do the material aspects of intermediary work affect regulators, targets, and beneficiaries? To shed light on this question, we studied an information intermediary in the form of a website and the organizations who founded it. Specifically, we analyzed FracFocus, a self‐regulatory initiative with strong industry ties, charged with disclosing data pertaining to the chemicals used in oil and gas wells completed using hydraulic fracturing technology (fracking) in the United States and Canada. We found that between 2010 and mid‐2017, the vast majority of legislation in states and provinces where fracking actively occurred was updated to mandate or encourage disclosure via FracFocus, meaning that it had a considerable effect on the trajectory of official regulation on fracking disclosure. We also found that FracFocus disclosed important data but did so in a manner that limited accessibility and reduced the comprehensibility of environmental and public health risks to beneficiaries. Our analysis suggests that the public's experience of such a device is one of opaque transparency, in which the line between official and non‐official regulation is blurred. We traced these outcomes to the material affordances created by FracFocus.     

管制放松背景下的私人拼车行为的制度完善探究

私人拼车行为的制度完善是指通过一系列切实可行的规范、政策或长效机制引导、规范和鼓励私人拼车行为的长期可持续发展。近年来私人拼车行为在迅速发展和日趋规范化的同时,也呈现出一系列问题,对私人拼车行为进行制度完善具备必要性和有效性。必须通过在全国范围内承认私人拼车行为的合法性,明确私人拼车行为的法律性质,优化私人拼车行为中存在的信息问题,从政府层面鼓励和提倡私人拼车行为的发展等四个路径对私人拼车行为进行制度完善。     

信息权利——一种权利类型分析

二十世纪 6 0年代以来 ,以蓬勃发展的信息技术为先导 ,人类开始步入信息社会。信息问题成为最具时代魅力和理论潜能的前沿领域 ,进而成为法学研究所关注的对象。信息是信息社会中极为重要的资源形式和社会的构成性元素。作为法律概念的信息是满足特定条件的符号系。信息权利是一个以信息为客体的法律权利束 ,作为一个权利类型具有解释性和制度性的双重功能优势     

职务犯罪情报信息机制之构建

当前职务犯罪情报信息工作中还存在观念滞后、机构缺失、手段落后、专业化程度不高等诸多问题,影响和制约了职务犯罪侦查工作的深入发展,因此必须构建以专门机构、专职人员、专有平台、专业机制为基础模块的职务犯罪情报信息机制。应深入探讨职务犯罪情报信息机制构建的具体举措及其在情报导侦中的实战运用,以期推进职务犯罪侦查水平进一步发展,实现职务犯罪侦查能力的跨越式提升。     

数字社会治理的权利逻辑:以个人信息权为中心

以信息技术为核心的数字社会迅速发展,促进多元主体信息交流和资讯共享,给个人信息保护带来挑战。作为数字社会公民身份的基本表征,个人信息权既是数字公民实现全面自由发展的先决条件,也是防范和控制数字权力异化的重要工具。实现数字社会个人信息权保护的价值追求,国家立法机关应秉持作为宪法价值核心的人格尊严进行立法,明晰个人信息权的规范内涵与保护机制;行政机关应遵循权力法定原则,严格基于法律保留、公共利益和比例原则处理和使用个人信息,并建立专门的个人信息权保护的监管机构;司法机关应通过法律适用和司法解释对被侵犯的个人信息权提供及时司法救济,填补法律漏洞,实现数字社会个人信息权保护的制度正义目标。