“党性与人民性相统一”的三重逻辑论析

中国共产党自成立以来,其全部理论和实践都充分证明,党性和人民性是统一的、一致的。党性与人民性相统一,既是我们党开展各项工作的基本原则,又是在鲜活实践中提炼出的重大理论观点,也是未来推动工作的根本遵循,具有重要的历史价值、理论价值和实践价值。深刻理解和科学把握党性与人民性相统一的历史逻辑、理论逻辑、实践逻辑,辨析两者关系、阐述价值意蕴、探究现实路径,为我们全面正确理解和把握它们的关系提供了依据、拓展了思路、指明了方向,能够帮助我们纠正错误认识、澄清理论纷争、开创崭新局面。     

The Hurried Justification of Sanctions

In this paper I try to see how the Derridean aporias of the law of the urgency of legal decisions (the law interrupts the input of knowledge in the decision-making process) and the épokhè of the rule (justice can never be done in the present) are revealed in the context of the justification of sanctions. I argue that sanctions can only be justified in a purposive manner in the last instance. They can only be means to an end of punishment which has been opted for, and which can be justified on grounds of principles, or an authoritative calculation of incommensurable entities. I argue against theories, which advocate the internal connection of law and morality, because if such a connection could be established, the aporia of the hurried and unjustified action would obviously disappear. In particular my target is discourse theory as formulated mainly by Robert Alexy with his Sonderfallthese(Special Case Thesis). My objection is that, because of their instrumental nature, sanctions cannot be justified on moral grounds. I also consider some objections that could be raised from Klaus Günther's theory of appropriateness and Habermas' distinction between the moral, ethical and pragmatic employments of practical reason. I am argue that the former, which would become relevant at the stage of application, that is sentencing, does not resolve the justificatory problem of sanctions, and the latter confirms rather than falsifies my claim that punishment can never be said to be just.     

"实用理性"——对中国传统文化"实践理性"误解的辩驳

对于中国传统文化,理论界有一种倾向是以康德的"实践理性"对其进行解释,但中国传统文化有其自身的成长土壤,"实践理性"不足以作出恰当的诠释。本文力争从中国传统文化的传承中找到其确切的界定,从中国传统文化的形成背景中寻找"实用理性"的因素;并通过对比分析"实用理性"、"实践理性"对中国传统文化的诠释,证明"实用理性"是中国传统思想在自身性格上所具有的特色。     

Repositioning Restorative Justice in Europe

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, the European Union (EU) has invested considerable amount of resources in supporting policies and legislation that promote mediation and other restorative justice (RJ) practices at the national and regional level. Alongside these developments a series of legal safeguards, standards, and regulations were introduced to mainstream restorative justice in European criminal justice systems. While we are far from claiming that a unified restorative justice model exists across European countries, the standardization of restorative justice through top-down approaches raises serious concerns around its viability as a community-born ethos. This article draws from the findings of an EU-funded research project that focused on the implementation of the restorative justice articles of the. Victims’ Directive. The article argues that if restorative justice is not repositioned in Europe through innovation and bottom-up structures of community, unregulated, unregistered, and localized projects, it will soon face its demise. The mainstreaming, regulation, and state control of restorative justice in Europe must be balanced against what Nils Christie identified as its original intention of returning conflicts re property.     

论工会工作理论创新的方法和途径

工会工作理论创新是工会适应新形势、新任务的需要,是工会工作落实科学发展观的需要。坚持工会工作理论创新必须以解决现实问题为目的,注意研究全面性、前瞻性、战略性重大工会理论课题;要以客观事实为根据,注重从职工群众中吸收理论创新营养;要以维权为重点,注重研究相关的政策;要以推动工会工作创新为动力,坚持马克思主义的发展观。     

简论警察诱捕战斗中的战术心理战

警察诱捕战斗的过程是一场心理较量的过程.了解和掌握诱捕战斗中战斗对象的心理特征对于恰当地采取战术方法具有积极意义.     

对派出所信息化建设情况的调研报告

笔者通过两个月的基层锻炼,了解到了一些派出所的信息化建设的现状,分析了派出所信息化建设中存在的主要问题,并提出了相应的方法和对策,由此引发了对公安信息化建设的几点思考。     

推进反腐倡廉建设科学化若干问题的思考

党的十七届四中全会明确提出“提高党的建设科学化水平”,十七届中纪委四次全会又提出了“提高反腐倡廉科学化水平”等重大命题。科学理解和准确把握反腐倡廉建设科学化的基本内涵和重要意义,认真总结中国特色反腐倡廉建设科学化的基本经验,深入分析我国反腐倡廉建设科学化进程中的主要问题,积极探索推进反腐倡廉科学化的具体路径,无疑具有重要的理论和实践意义。     

《日本国籍法》对在日朝鲜人的作用

2010年是签订"日韩合并条约"一百周年。在"日韩合并"到二战结束之后的这一段历史时期,日本根据"日韩合并条约"和"法务省民事局局长通报"先后两次剥夺了朝鲜人的国籍,进行了人权侵害。21世纪前后,《日本国籍法》的两次修改在一定程度上保障了在日朝鲜人的人格和权益。     

Natural Law: Practical Reason and Creative Information

With nine main theses that are interspersed with each other, this paper explores and articulates some of the most important questions in natural law theory. The theses include: I. In investigating facts, one finds reasons to choose an honest self-discipline; II. Deliberating, one finds reasons similarly directing one to other intrinsic goods; III. Taken integrally, these goods and principles acquire the force of moral precepts; IV. Those precepts, natural moral law, depict our nature (humanity) in its flourishing; V. Nature and natures are best explained by free, intelligent transcendent creation; VI. Creation and other gifts past and present deserve our gratitude; VII. Natural moral law and historical revelation are two channels of information; VIII. Secular and spiritual communities are distinct and respectfully self-governing; IX. Natural moral law defines human rights but rightfully extends beyond them.