检察机关提起民事公益诉讼之权力解析及程序构建

我国的检察权是一种复合型的权力,法律监督权和公诉权是其最主要的两种权能,这两种权力在本质上存在不可兼容性。检察机关提起民事公益诉讼的权力源自其公诉职能。检察机关提起民事公益诉讼的制度构建应该首先在宪法上明确其公诉职能,并以此为据,在《人民检察院组织法》和《民事诉讼法》中确定检察机关在民事公益诉讼中的"公诉人"地位,设置检察机关提起公益诉讼的特别程序。     

Overview of: “Getting the Law Involved a Quasi-Experiment in Early Intervention Involving Collaboration Between Schools and the District Attorney's Office”

Research Summary Precursors to serious and chronic delinquency often emerge in childhood, stimulating calls for early interventions. Most intervention efforts rely solely on social service programs—often to the exclusion of the juvenile justice system. The juvenile justice system has been reluctant to become involved in the lives of relatively young children fearing net widening or further straining resources that could be used for older youth with documented delinquency histories. We report here the results of an early intervention program sponsored by and housed in a district attorney's office in Louisiana. Using a quasi-experimental design, we examined outcomes associated with program involvement as well as whether the obvious involvement of the prosecutor's office was associated with further reductions in problem behavior.

• 1 : The results revealed that significant reductions in problem behaviors of young children could be attributed to program participation.
• 2 : The obvious involvement of the district attorney's office, however, was associated with limited, albeit significant, reductions in specific problem behaviors.
• 3 : These findings show that successful early intervention efforts can be made part of the juvenile justice system and that in some limited situations prosecutorial involvement can result in positive outcomes.

Policy Implications The expansion of early intervention programming into the juvenile justice system offers opportunities to address early problem behavior. Our study and its results have the following policy implications.

• 1 : Closely coupled partnerships between schools and the juvenile justice system can effectively address, mitigate, and perhaps prevent an early onset of antisocial behavior.
• 2 : Even so, coupling early intervention efforts to the mission of the juvenile justice system warrants debate. Net-widening, resource diffusion, and the potential for officials to rely too heavily on the deterrent characteristics of the justice system represent serious threats to the integrity of effective early intervention programs.
• 3 : We suggest substantial debate and consideration is given before coupling early intervention efforts to the juvenile justice system.

     

民事抗诉制度的尴尬

2007年修改的《民事诉讼法》及相关司法解释未从根本上完善民事抗诉制度。法学界关于民事抗诉制度的争论一直未达成共识。制度缺陷和理论争辩使民事抗诉制度陷于存与废的纠结之中。民事抗诉制度仍有存续的必要;强化之路在于民事抗诉权与刑事检察权的有机结合。     

走出困惑天地宽--监狱人才问题的现状分析与建议

监狱系统既存在缺乏人才、急需人才的不争事实,又或多或少存在不珍惜人才、浪费人才的现实.这既有狭隘人才观、求全责备、实用主义、"等靠要"思想的问题,又有条件、环境、经济困难和机制体制方面的问题.要改进和加强监狱系统的人才工作,除认真规划、从长计议外,还得创新人才的评价、考核、激励机制,重视内部挖潜、抓主要矛盾、选准突破口、争取政策支持、招贤纳士等.     

有关存款保险制度若干问题的法律研究

存款保险制度是当今国际金融监管的通行做法,对于保护小额存款人的利益、维护金融秩序的稳定有着积极的作用。从存款保险的基本理论和制度比较两方面入手,指出一个科学合理的存款保险制度设计有助于上述功能的实现,并对构成其主要内容的各个要素进行阐述;随后对有关国家和国际组织关于存款保险制度的立法和实践作比较性评介;最后结合我国国情提出我国建立存款保险制度的立法构想。     

房屋交付执行的民事监督路径之探究

不动产作为人类社会中最有价值的财产之一,能否顺利执行对债权人意义重大,其中以房屋的交付执行最具有代表性。本文以房屋交付执行中的物之交付请求权执行和行为请求权执行作为切入点,剖析了法院执行活动中腾房执行的现实性困难,围绕查封与腾房退地两项具体措施详述了执行环节的具体表现和问题所在,以此论证分析了检察机关行使监督权的突破方向和实践进路,以期结合自身职能发挥优势,在监督时重点突出、有的放矢。     

《刑法》罪名确定机制的演进与革新——由全国人大常委会确定《刑法》罪名的建议

目前,《刑法》或《刑法修正案》出台后由最高人民法院、最高人民检察院以司法解释形式确定新规定犯罪之称谓的传统罪名确定机制存在诸多弊端．如易背离立法本意、效率低下等。以与时俱进之理念革新现行《刑法》罪名确定机制势在必行,考虑我国刑事司法的实际状况,在经过与《刑法修正案》同步出台立法解释和在《刑法修正案》中直接规定罪名两个阶段的过渡后,最终将实现由最高立法机关在刑法典中直接规定罪名的理想目标。     

海峡两岸深入开展旅游合作的政治经济意义及建议

海峡两岸同文同脉同根,海峡两岸本是一家人。海峡两岸深入开展旅游合作不仅有利于促进两岸人民的交流与合作,增进两岸人民彼此的互信与了解,旱日实现祖国和平统一,还是促进台湾经济发展和惠及台湾人民的战略举措。因此,海峡两岸深入开展旅游合作是在海峡两岸架起友谊的桥梁,有利于发展两岸关系,推进祖国统一大业的早日完成。     

关于公安院校教育成本问题的探讨

在我国经济高速发展的今天,高等教育作为国家的一种投资,相关各方都迫切需要进行成本核算。但是我国的公安院校还是执行事业单位的会计核算制度、接受财政的预算管理,在观念上、会计理论上、会计制度和会计核算上,都存在一定的问题,需要在观念的转变上、会计理论上、会计制度和会计核算上以及过渡期配套工作上突破原来的管理瓶颈,以期实现我国公安院校健康有序的发展。     

也论诱惑侦查的规制--刑事诉讼法再修改的视角

“诱惑”这一刑事法律并未规定的侦查手段在刑事案件的侦查中被广泛应用 ,其对刑事诉讼最终价值目标的实现 ,有着一定的理论和现实价值 ;面临刑事诉讼法的再次修改 ,如果不从立法上对诱惑的条件、范围、对象等予以明确规定、对诱惑的方式进行有效的规制 ,侦查机关的这一侦查行为 ,必将演变为“引诱者”与“被引诱者”的共同犯罪行为。本文从诱惑的表现形式入手 ,结合司法实践及国外有关情况 ,对诱惑侦查的有效规制提出了自己的见解 ,并提出了立法建议。