贯彻落实科学发展观之统筹兼顾方法论研究

统筹兼顾要求我们在工作中总揽全局、协调各方、统筹谋划、兼顾全面，充分调动一切积极因素，妥善处理各种利益关系，着力加强经济社会发展的薄弱环节。必须看到建设和发展中国特色社会主义，体现伟大的探索和不断发展着事业的统一。一定时期的矛盾与问题解决了，新的矛盾与问题又会发生。然而不管出现什么情况，发生什么矛盾，都需要我们用统筹兼顾的方法来解决。     

“清官政治诉求”的学理分析

关于“清官政治诉求”的核心,目前学界并无定论。大致有两种意见,一种认为是“忠君”,一种认为是“逆君”。“忠君说”认为“清官政治诉求”虽然是一个“孝亲-忠君-爱民”三位一体的结构,但其核心仍然是“忠君”;“逆君说”则认为“清官政治诉求”的核心是在君之上安置一个“理”,这个“理”是逆君的,而不是顺君的。牺牲一切现实利益,以致以牺牲生命来捍卫此“理”,捍卫此“道统”,正是“清官”的本义所在,正是“清官政治诉求”之根本落脚点。在此意义上说,“清官”在中国政治“天-君-民”的三极循环中,正是“天”一极的代表与象征。本文认同“逆君说”,并扼要分析了“清官政治诉求”在中国长盛不衰的原因及其现实基础与精神价值。     

Lessons from Philosophy? Interdisciplinary Justice Research and Two Classes of Justice Judgments

More and more scholars of social justice have been calling for a closer collaboration between empirical and normative disciplines. Psychological and sociological research, as well as philosophical theories can, so they claim, learn from one another and work should be based on results obtained in the other fields of research. Some political philosophers do not share this view. They argue that, since most empirical research does not capture people's moral views on justice, its results cannot be of any value to their theories. Based on this critique I suggest in the first part of this paper that empirical research should distinguish between two classes of justice judgments: First, justice judgments in a narrow sense, which are made under conditions of impartiality and grounded in moral principles, and second, justice attitudes, which differ from other types of social attitudes only in their attitude objects. In the second part I present a quasi-experimental study that aimed at testing the two different classes of justice judgments empirically. The results show that justice judgments in the narrow sense can be obtained even under conditions in which complex experimental manipulations cannot be employed. In the third part of this paper I hypothesize that justice judgments which are based on the two formal criteria provided by political philosophy (impartiality and reference to moral principles) may serve as important intervening variables when trying to explain the impact of justice beliefs on different patterns of human behavior.     

Disentangling the Effects of Bounding and Mobility on Reports of Criminal Victimization

Replacement respondents who move into NCVS households after the initial bounding interview can introduce measurement error since their reports of victimization may be influenced by their mobility (actual experiences) and by their unbounded interview status (response error). Which of these factors affects reporting is unknown and is the focus of this research. The availability of incoming respondent data from the NCVS School Crime Supplement and mobility status from the NCVS provides a unique opportunity to study these effects separately. Both bounding and mobility were found to influence reporting; however, this influence was not consistent. Unlike findings from past research, bounding only had significant effects on reports of property victimization. Conversely, moving only significantly affected reports of violent victimization. As this study is the first to disentangle the effect of unbounded interview status from mobility on reports of victimization, the findings emphasize the need for further research to better understand these issues.     

Influence and the Referee Process

This study examines the influence the referee process has on the development of economic thought. It examines the practices, principles, theories, and methodology involved in the referee process and the development of economic thought. It finds that the complaints against it are difficult, if not impossible, to measure. It identifies a central problem with the referee process, the use of citations to measure both influence and quality. It concludes with a proposal for a different and broader citation index and a call to change the dependence of many decisions on the use of citations.Version 1 of paper given at the Erfurt Conference on Academic Publishing, December 12, 2003     

"人的主体性"原理对思想政治工作的方法论意义

马克思主义“人的主体性”原理是思想政治工作的理论基础之一 ,为面向新世纪的思想政治工作的创新发展提供了新的思维向度。思想政治工作应注重把握“人的主体性”的有关规律 ,并在理论与实践的创新发展中自觉遵循这些规律。思想政治工作应该在正确引导人们先天属性进步的基础上 ,着重培养和塑造人们的后天属性 ,应抑制破坏的主体性 ,倡导建设的主体性 ,肯定重复的主体性 ,激发创造的主体性 ,应以尊重人们的基本需要为起点 ,以促进人类的全面发展为使命。     

青年研究从质疑开始

本文是对前文《我们的青年研究缺什么》(见《浙江青年专修学院学报》创刊号)的再思考。重提在青年研究中问题意识的重要性,对实证主义和人文主义两种方法论进行探讨、分析,并认为提倡纯学术研究,“为学术而学术”在当下的必要性,提出青年研究从质疑开始。     

我国近代妇女成人教育的嬗变及现实意义

妇女社会地位的日趋攀升与妇女教育水平普遍偏低的现实使妇女问题成为社会学关注的焦点.当前妇女社会地位的改善重点在于妇女成人教育,目前其潜在的社会功能正引起越来越多的关注.我国社会各界都在探索解决妇女成人教育问题,其认识了解的途径可谓见仁见智.从史学的角度分析近代妇女成人教育的发展历程,能够有效地把握妇女成人教育的发端、发展以及完善的脉络,充分挖掘历史经验,并更好地为当前妇女教育服务.     

论建立统一的综合法学

当代的主流法律哲学明显地分成三个学派，即研究法律价值的自然法学，研究法律规范的分析法学和研究社会的社会法学。三个法学派别分别从不同角度对法律这一现象进行研究，各有其片面性。所以，对法律的统一研究具有重大理论意义和现实意义。法律研究的统一在于它的理论基础，法律基础和历史形态的统一，同时也是法律的辩证发展过程与历史和现实三的统一。     

Toward a Theory of Negotiation Precedent

It is remarkable that precedents and their use have not been well explored within the negotiation literature. In this article, I examine the sparse knowledge of precedents and offer a preliminary framework for understanding the role of precedents in negotiation, including how negotiators establish and apply them. Precedents can either evolve randomly or be created with strategic intent. Understanding precedents generally involves examining how negotiators build, adopt, avoid, and reject them. In this review of the existing literature, I identify twelve concepts and paradigms that are particularly relevant to our understanding of negotiation precedents. I also establish a research agenda and identify three methods for further developing our knowledge of precedents: applying path dependence theory from the field of international relations to a negotiation context; conducting experimental research in a laboratory setting involving subjects engaged in negotiation exercises that contain opportunities to apply precedents; and conducting field research with a focus on case methodology grounded in negotiation linkage theory and theories of negotiation dynamics. Finally, in this article, I formulate a two‐part framework on building and applying precedents, and offer managerial guidance for the negotiation practitioner. Precedents serve as a strategic technique and provide a source of power at that point in a negotiation when decisions are made.