美国如何打击身份盗窃犯罪

12种身份失窃犯罪在美国是个普遍存在的问题。为使民众更好地保护自己的个人信息不受侵犯,美国贸易委员会出版了一系列的小册子,提醒民众加以预防。在美国,联邦贸易委员会希望消费者和商家更多地了解个人信息和隐私的重要性。美国公众可以随时免费获得这些宣传手册,也可以浏览联邦贸易委员会网站或者阅读该委员会的众多期刊,以获得更多的此类信息。     

论盗窃虚拟财产的定性

以非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪定性盗窃虚拟财产的行为虽然符合罪刑法定原则的要求,但该罪名不能反映犯罪目的,盗窃虚拟财产的行为也没有扰乱公共秩序,虚拟财产具有价值,也可脱离受害者的控制,并能被盗窃者实际控制,符合盗窃罪的要求,盗窃者如果具有永久性剥夺受害人虚拟财产的犯罪意图的,应该以盗窃罪追究其刑事责任,域外的实践也将盗窃虚拟财产的行为定性为盗窃罪.盗窃虚拟财产的行为也可能构成盗窃罪、侵犯通信自由罪、非法获取计算机信息系统数据罪与破坏计算机信息系统罪,属想象竞合犯.     

浅谈"亲亲相隐"入律的合理性

亲亲相隐是中国古代法一直遵循的一项基本原则,体现了中国特有的宗法制度和人伦情怀.然而及至近代,在对西法的移植过程中,中国逐渐抛弃了这种几千年来一脉相承的法律思想,严重背弃了传统和中国特有的法文化,使得一部分的立法和法律实施得不到民众的认同,长此以往,对社会主义法治势必造成负面影响,因此,"亲亲相隐"入律符合中国法律的传...     

Data and information theft in e-commerce, jurisdictional challenges, related issues and response of Indian laws

Data and information constitute a valuable resource both for the companies in general and individuals in specific. The traditional paper based transaction has been replaced by electronic transaction and now a day’s most of the valuable data and information’s are stored in electronic medium. Therefore data and information security have become a matter of great concern for every agencies acting on faith of e-transaction. In India there remains an added significance owing to the fact that a growing number of companies seek more centralized and less expensive methods of processing information, they’re turning to offshore outsourcing to fulfill many of their business and human resources processes. Data theft is not in itself a new concept, but has become an increasingly important issue in the digital age. The new mode of communication, its malleability, transmissibility, networking capacity, affect our lives in many and sometimes surprising ways, it requires that we find new legal solutions for new social questions.     

刑法的困境与宪法的解答 规范宪法学视野中的许霆案

在许霆案的讨论中，刑法教义学所面临的尴尬处境只有通过宪法教义学的介入才能够得以消解，即必须反思刑法第264条特殊加罚条款的合宪性问题。在现代社会，相较于其他行业的法人组织，金融机构对于国民经济与社会的稳定繁荣而言更为重要。由此，在刑法上给予金融机构“适当的”特别关照应当被允许。但是，无论从比例原则还是从体系解释的角度看，为盗窃金融机构数额特别巨大的行为所设定的刑罚，在只限于死刑和无期徒刑这一点上，从立法目的的角度上已经难以充分说明，即为了达到立法目的超过了必要的限度，因此不能被认为是基于合理依据的差别对待。争议条款违反了宪法平等权规范，应属无效。     

论盗窃罪构成中的秘密要件

盗窃罪是司法实践中较为常见的一种犯罪类型,但是由于立法与司法上的缺陷和不足,使得这一犯罪的认定出现了争议,主要争议点之一便是是否应将秘密窃取作为盗窃罪的客观构成要件。文章由此入手,分析了当前的肯定和否定观点,并提出了相应的建议。     

对盗窃文物犯罪几个问题的探讨

现行刑法将盗窃文物犯罪的行为涵盖在盗窃罪中,使得盗窃文物犯罪行为在定罪标准和量刑幅度的认定上存在诸多问题.根据文物犯罪体系化的要求,以及打击文物犯罪的需要,应当将盗窃文物的行为规定为独立的罪名,并将其纳入妨害文物管理罪中.盗窃文物罪的犯罪对象应当是可移动文物,不可移动文物的雕塑、壁画、建筑构件及附属文物在一定条件下也可以成为盗窃罪的犯罪对象.     

Addressing identity crime in crime management information systems: Definitions,classification, and empirics

Identity fraud as a term and concept in its formative stages was often presumed to be identity theft and visa versa. However, identity theft is caused by the identities (or tokens) of individuals or organisations being stolen is an enabling precursor to identity fraud. The boundaries of identity fraud and identity theft are now better defined. The absence of specific identity crime legislation could be a cause of perpetrators not classified as breaching identity crimes but under other specific entrenched law such as benefit fraud, or credit card fraud. This metrics overlap can cause bias in crime management information systems. This study uses a multi-method approach where data was collected in both a quantitative and qualitative manner. These approaches are used as a lens for defining different classes of online identity crimes in a crime management (IS) security context. In doing so, we contribute to a deeper understanding of identity crime by specifically examining its hierarchical classes and definitions; to aid clearer structure in crime management IS. We seek to answer the questions: should current law around identity fraud continue to be reinforced and measures introduced to prevent identity crime; should laws be amended; or should new identity crime laws be constructed? We conclude and recommend a solution incorporating elements of all three.     

Auto Theft and Restrictive Deterrence

Although researchers have examined the attributes that make offenders more or less responsive to sanction threats, far less attention has centered on the manner in which responsiveness can lead to less detectible crime, or perhaps even more overall crime. Restrictive deterrence is the concept that explains this paradox. We explore it here using qualitative interviews with 35 active auto thieves. Findings suggest that auto thieves' restrictively deterrent decision-making strategies fell into three broad categories: discretionary target selection, normalcy illusions, and defiance. Discussion focuses on the data's conceptual implications for restrictive deterrence and offender decision-making.     

预算执行审计“屡审屡犯”问题探析——以国家治理视角的考量

国家审计因其内生的监督评价职能而成为国家治理不可缺少的有效工具和重要制度安排。国家审计有效发挥监督作用的前提是基于国家公共财政治理的各项制度本身的合理安排和良性互动。多年来出现的预算执行审计"屡审屡犯"现象,说明基于国家治理的制度安排存在缺陷。对某省省级部门预算执行审计"屡审屡犯"问题的分析表明,"屡审屡犯"背后的根源是政府预算制度、预算执行审计管理制度、政府预算管理配套制度均存在自身局限。要治理该问题,就必须从改革完善政府预算制度、深化改进预算执行审计、建立健全相关配套制度等方面寻求对策。