社会主义新农村建设的社会学解读

从社会学的角度看，社会主义新农村建设的最终实现是农民、支持者和政府以彼此之间利益最大化为取向进行互动和模仿的必然结果。新农村建设中的社会关系是一种正常的和谐的社会关系。社会主义新农村建设的动力来源于社会主义社会的吸引力和整合力。     

塑造民警时代精神打造一流警察队伍——论弘扬和培育新时期江苏监狱民警精神

监狱民警精神是民警队伍建设和监狱事业赖以生存和发展的灵魂和支柱。弘扬和培育新时期江苏监狱民警精神，有必要对该精神的内涵和监狱民警精神的概念、特点进行辨析．深刻把握监狱民警精神的功能，充分认识塑造监狱民警精神的重要性和必要性。同时，结合江苏监狱工作形势发展的实际，其对江苏监狱警察精神进行了提炼和内涵解读，对弘扬和培育民警精神的途径进行了阐述。     

论党的基本路线与中国的现代化道路

从理论与实际、历史与现实相结合的角度考察 ,党在初级阶段的基本路线是中国共产党人对社会主义现代化理论与道路探索的结晶 ;是中国发生第三次历史巨变的根本所在 ;是实现中国现代化百年梦想的根本之路。     

城市交通事故地理信息系统的建设初探

从道路交通本身的行业特点出发,交通事故处理的传统人工管理方面存在许多不足,应采用更为科学的方式来解决,即引入地理信息系统GIS来为道路交通事故的预防提供有力的支持。     

以学科建设为核心 创建一流警察大学——写在国家批准“公安学”、“公安技术”设立为一级学科之际

一流警察院校创建的核心在于学科建设。学科建设的路径选择包括:整合、凝练学科建设理念,做好学科建设规划,促进学科结构优化平衡,强化公安学科特色,学科建制的构建与完善。     

对提高干部选拔任用工作民主质量的调查和思考——以贵州省铜仁市为例

干部选拔任用工作民主主要体现在群众知情权、参与权、选择权和监督权的落实上,让所有人都能顺畅、真实地表达个人意愿。提高干部选拔任用工作民主质量的根本标准是把合适的干部选配到合适的岗位上,这样才能有效发挥干部能动作用,也才能体现干部选拔任用工作在广大人民群众的认可度和公信力。     

A perfect match? The impact of statement selection on voting advice applications' ability to match voters and parties

This study examines how statement selection systematically affects the output of voting advice applications (VAAs). Does the statement selection influence how often voters are matched with parties that ‘should be’ close to them? Our benchmark is a classic account of issue voting, the proximity left–right model. We analyze the Belgian VAA Do the Vote Test and find that the output resembles the left–right model. When more left–right statements are included, more left-wing voters get the advice to vote for left-wing parties and the same is true on the right, while simultaneously advantaging parties with more extreme positions on this dimension. We also analyze issue saliency and find that parties are disadvantaged when more statements about salient issues are included. These findings imply tough choices for VAA builders.     

社区矫正之实证考察及路径选择

社区矫正是与监禁刑相对的行刑方式,是促进罪犯顺利回归社会的非监禁刑罚执行活动。自2003年我国开展社区矫正试点工作以来,社区矫正工作取得了斐然成绩,但与此同时也存在着不可忽视的种种问题。随着2009年社区矫正工作在全国实施及2011年《刑法修正案(八)》将"依法实行社区矫正"正式写入我国刑法,社区矫正进入了新的发展阶段。有鉴于此,需要从观念层面、立法层面、操作层面、社会层面、保障层面进行转变与完善,为社区矫正工作向更高层次发展铺平道路。     

Mediation and the Art of Shuttle Diplomacy

Mediation caucusing — that is, separate meetings conducted by the mediator with some, but not all, of the parties — is widely used, but it has become increasingly controversial, as some mediators advocate for a no‐caucus form of mediation using only joint sessions with all parties present. The rationale for the no‐caucus model is that caucuses give the mediator too much power at the expense of the parties, and joint sessions improve the parties' understanding of each other's views. But caucusing adds value to mediation in several ways. First, from the standpoint of economic theory, caucusing provides mediators with an important tool for overcoming two impediments to settlement — the “prisoner's dilemma” (caused by the parties' fear of mutual exploitation) and “adverse selection” (caused by the failure to disclose information). Second, caucusing can help the mediator overcome a variety of negotiation problems, such as communication barriers, unrealistic expectations, emotional barriers, intraparty conflict, and fear of losing face. Third, caucusing provides a more private setting in which the mediator can develop a deeper and more personal understanding of the parties' needs and interests. Although the no‐caucus model may be appropriate for certain types of mediation (particularly those cases in which the parties will have an ongoing relationship), some parties may prefer the efficiency that can be achieved with caucusing, even if that means sacrificing certain other values — such as greater understanding — or giving the mediator more information than the parties have, thus creating the risk of manipulation by the mediator. Moreover, the choice is not binary — numerous variations and hybrid formats can be useful, such as sessions in which the mediator meets with only the parties' lawyers or with only the parties. Choosing the best format for a mediation is more of an art than a science, and mediators should consider, with the parties, whether the parties' objectives would be best served using only joint sessions, extensive caucusing, or a combination of these approaches.     

管理人选任制度的反思与重塑

管理人在破产程序中承载着管理、协调与监督的职能,其职责的行使牵涉多方利益。因此,保证管理人身份上的独立、中立以及专业性显得至关重要。现有的中介机构可以分担管理人职责,应当设立管理人协会,负责管理人名册的编制、管理等工作。管理人的法律地位应为法定机构,由人民法院指定并决定其报酬,债权人会议享有异议权。对于＂无产可破＂的案件,建议设立专项基金作为支付管理人报酬的来源。