我国涉恐资产冻结法律制度的司法适用疑难问题探讨

防治恐怖活动犯罪是当下我国重大的现实问题。冻结涉及恐怖活动组织和恐怖活动人员的资产有助于在经济上打击恐怖活动。我国已建立了完整的涉恐资产冻结制度,但是司法适用中,在涉恐资产的冻结对象认定上,我们应当将"恐怖活动"的主观要素作为区分"恐怖活动"与其他暴力活动的界限。明确"资助或者以其他方式协助"恐怖活动是"恐怖活动"的表现形式;涉恐资产冻结的主体是应当履行反洗钱义务的金融机构、特定非金融机构;在将出台的《反恐怖法》中应协调好涉恐资产冻结制度与相关法律制度之间的关系。     

Creating resilience or private sector dependence? Shifting constructions of the farmer in Australian policy discourses

The Australian Government’s Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper aims to create a profitable and resilient Australian agriculture sector. In doing so, the White Paper emphasises farmers’ individual responses to the structural problems which have undermined farmers’ profitability, such as consolidated commodities markets. In particular, the White Paper recommends that farmers shape their farming practice to make their farms more attractive to private investors. This is presented as a normal response to farm profitability concerns. Farms are portrayed as investment targets and securing investment is framed as an essential skill of the modern farmer. To understand how this discursive construction has been made possible, this article develops a genealogical analysis of changing constructions of farmers, farming and of the role of the State. This research reveals the subtle discursive shifts which have helped shift responsibility for farming, from the State, to the self-reliant individual, and most recently, towards the private sector. Whereas the construct of the self-reliant, independent farmer has been used to facilitate deregulation of agricultural industries, this recent shift in power towards the private sector may potentially undermine farmers’ autonomy and increase dependence on private sector investment.     

隐名投资人股东资格认定问题研究

股东是公司关系中最为重要的角色,股东资格又是股东地位的法律基础。隐名投资争议中隐名投资人股东资格的认定遂成为理论及实务界的难题。为了给司法实践提供有效解决的路径,在已有理论研究的基础上展开讨论,从厘清基本概念出发,对争议进行类型化的处理,提出借用《合同法》的隐名代理制度和代理人身份不公开制度来解释隐名投资的内外关系,并结合案例分析,提出相应的解决办法。     

实名制下有偿代购火车票行为的法律性质分析——以10元“倒卖”火车票案为视角

倒卖车票、船票罪中倒卖行为的实质是具有投机性。火车票实名制度的出台有效限制了传统倒卖行为中对火车票的囤积，实名制下有偿代购火车票的行为不具有投机性，其本质应属于一般违法经营活动。从罪刑法定原则出发。其行为表现与侵害的法益不同于传统倒卖行为，不应认定为倒卖车票、船票罪；在利益衡量的角度，有偿代购火车票的行为也不宜认定为犯罪行为。为秩序与便利的平衡，应当对有偿代购行为进行合理规制。     

金融消费者知情权保护的法经济分析

知情权是消费者权利体系的前提与基础,而金融消费的专业性及复杂性,使得金融消费者的信息弱势状态强于普通消费者.在我国,权利初始配置不合理、运行保障缺位等制度缺陷,导致金融机构侵权损害成本社会化.后金融危机时代,一个理想的出路应是倚重金融法治与金融监管,构筑有效的法律激励机制,以降低侵权损害成本.     

The post-Lisbon high representatives: an introduction

ABSTRACT

The Lisbon Treaty recently celebrated its 10th anniversary. The 2009 legal text was an attempt to enhance the unity, consistency and effectiveness of the EU’s action in an increasingly volatile world. And yet, the post-Lisbon time period has been characterised by multiple crises coming from the West, the East, the South, and even from within the EU. Against this backdrop, our Special Issue makes a systematic assessment of the EU's foreign policy post-Lisbon and of its evolution by focusing on the role of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR/VP). Assessing the post-Lisbon HR/VPs provides important insights on EU foreign policy processes over the past decade. In this introduction, we discuss the three research questions that guide our collection of articles, as well as our theoretical and empirical contribution to existing scholarly literature.     

Crucial Factors in Implementing Radical Policy Change: A Comparative Longitudinal Study of Nordic Central Agency Relocation Programs

Abstract

Why do public policies succeed or fail? The aim of this article is to contribute to answering this enduring research question in policy research through a comparative study of the variable efforts by Nordic governments to relocate their central agencies from the capital regions over a period of several decades. This was a radical redistributive policy program premised on a policy instrument – coercion – which was very alien to political systems characterized as consensual democracies. Hence, it is no surprise that only two out of seven relocation programs of any substance were successful. The really intriguing research question here is how any relocation program was achievable at all in a policy context where this was very unlikely. A broadly based multi-theoretical analytical framework linking interest groups, institutions, human agency in the form of policy entrepreneurship/design and situational factors is employed to solve this research puzzle. Findings from this study offer important contributions to the following research fields: comparative public policy, radical policy change and most specifically the so-called third generation of public policy implementation research.     

Pathways to urban citizenship for low-income migrants in São Paulo

Recent waves of migrants are establishing an increasingly visible presence in the urban landscape of São Paulo, both in its centre and its peripheries. Though a city with a rich history of immigration and diversity, the arrival of migrants in recent decades has not been accompanied by specific municipal policies for the migrant population, an absence which affects in particular, low-income migrants. Urban social movements for migration take on the role of attempting to govern migration in the city by providing everyday support to migrants as well as mobilising them as a political group to demand changes on both national and municipal scales; yet these movements have limitations. The paper thus also highlights the agency of migrants in accessing their rights through empowering micro-level social networks and through individual negotiations with legal possibilities. Drawing on examples of institutional, activist and migrant practices in addressing questions of inclusion and exclusion in the city, the paper will trace the multiple and still fragmented ways of articulating rights and developing a sense of urban citizenship as newer waves of migrants join the urban landscape of São Paulo.     

Lived citizenship as the locus of political agency in participatory policy

Participatory policies seeking to foster active citizenship continue to be dominated by a territorial imagination. Yet, the world where people identify and perform as citizens is spatially multifarious. This article engages with the tension between territorially grounded perceptions and relational modes of practicing political agency. Studying empirically the Finnish child and youth policies, we address jointly the participatory obligations that municipalities strive to fulfill, and the spatial attachments that children and young people establish in their lived worlds. To this end, we introduce the concept of lived citizenship as an interface where the territorially-bound public administration and the plurality of spatial attachments characteristic to transnational living may meet. We conclude by proposing a re-grounding of lived citizenship in both topological and topographical terms as an improvement in theoretical understanding of mundane political agency and as a step towards more proficient participatory policies.     

由一则案例评析表见代理的适用

表见代理制度的建立,必须以善意为基础,是以牺牲本人的利益为代价而维护交易安全。表见代理是无权代理的例外,是一种特殊的有权代理。表见代理不能够轻率地被认定成立,否则,将会破坏交易安全。表见代理的成立不以本人有过失为要件。适用表见代理制度,关键是确定相对人相信行为人有代理权之理由是否成立、理由是否充分。法官如何判断相对人有理由,应当综合考虑当事人订立合同的目的、合同基础、交易对价、交易规则和交易习惯、相对人的审查义务等多种因素予以分析认定。必须要衡量相对人订立合同时的主观状态,有没有过失,是不是善意。