The effects of marital status and social isolation on adult male homicides in the United States: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study

With data from the 1979–1985 Longitudinal Mortality Study, we examine the effects of marital status and social isolation on adult male homicide (ICD-9 Codes E960-E978). Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to a 1979–1981 population cohort of approximately 200,000 adult men and their mortality experiences were followed until 1984–1985. Multivariate hazards regression analysis showed that marital status and social isolation are associated with significantly higher risks of homicide victimization. Controlling for age and other socioeconomic covariates, single persons were 1.9 times, and divorced, separated or widowed persons were 1.7 times, more likely to die from homicide than married persons. Socially isolated persons were 1.6 times more likely to become homicide victims. Other adult males with increased risk of homicide victimization were African Americans and those who lived in the inner city.     

广东毒品犯罪的现状与对策研究

由于国际毒潮的渗透、影响,国内毒品问题严重地区的辐射、互动和省内毒品消费市场的形成、拉动,目前广东是“金三角”海洛因向国内分销的中转集散地,是国内冰毒、摇头丸等新型毒品制造、贩卖、销售最活跃的地区之一,毒品违法犯罪活动呈全面扩散、多元发展态势,制贩毒品犯罪趋于集团化、武装化,藏毒手法和运毒方式日益智能化。对此,应从广泛深入发动群众,拓展禁毒宣传教育的深度和广度;依法从重从快严厉打击毒品犯罪;夯实禁毒工作基础,完善长效缉毒机制;严格落实吸毒人员全员收戒的措施等方面全力遏制毒品来源和吸毒人员的滋生,为构建和谐广东创造良好的社会环境。     

论行政主体义务在行政法中的地位

强化行政主体义务是当代行政法治的基本格局,然而,行政主体义务的法律地位在行政法学界却鲜有阐释。为了弥补这一理论空缺,本文从行政主体义务在行政法中地位的模式选择、行政主体义务在行政法地位中的应然表现、行政主体义务在行政法治实践中存在的问题以及行政主体义务与重构行政法体系等方面对行政主体义务的理论和实践问题进行了分析。     

略论我国民事诉讼中的专家辅助人

最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第61条规定了在涉及专门知识的案件中,当事人可以申请专家出庭参与庭审。这一规定在我国法律中第一次提出了专家辅助人的概念,但由于法律对专家辅助人的概念、诉讼地位、权利义务、资格条件及适用程序都没有规定,司法实践难以操作,有必要加以明确。     

An Analysis of Women''''s Social Status at Bourgeois Times from Marriage in Pride and Prejudice

The opening sentence of Pride and Prejudice left the deep impression on readers almost two centuries ago.As the author of Pride and Prejudice,Jane Austen was one of the famous realistic writers in English literature in the nineteenth century. In Pride and Prejudice Austen wrote four marriage types:ideal Elizabeth and Darcy,realizable Charlotte and Collins,felicitous Jane and Bingley,unhappy Lydia and Wickham.She pointed out emphatically economic consideration is the bonds of wedlock and love.She said marriage is not determined by property and family status;it is unwise to marry without money,but it is wrong to marry for money;the marriage settled by love is happy and ideal.     

业主委员会法律地位初探

长期以来,我国物业管理活动中一直存在着业主委员会法律地位不明、职责不清、运作不规范等问题,这种状况已严重制约了我国物业管理朝着更高水平发展。因此,如何使业主委员会走出这种法律困境,更好地发挥其在业主自治中的应有作用,成为我们必须共同面对并加以解决的一个课题。文章围绕业主委员会的法律地位这一亟待解决的问题进行阐述,以期完善我国物业立法,使业主委员会的运作走上正轨。     

Re-thinking urban citizenship for immigrants from a policy perspective: the case of Barcelona

This article proposes that the role of cities in immigrant integration be reconsidered through the prism of urban citizenship, looking at how local policies co-regulate immigrants’ status, rights and identity. It argues that urban citizenship connects two dominant understandings of citizenship, as city governments are under pressure to reconcile the normative perspective of formal membership of the state with the claims for rights expressed by excluded parts of the urban citizenry. A case study of an inclusive way of regulating citizenship in Barcelona illustrates how a citizenship perspective can cast light on the specific ways in which cities regulate immigrant citizenship in interaction with higher levels of government, and highlights some of the levers cities possess to modify the boundaries between inclusion and exclusion of immigrants locally.     

中国行政问责制建设的现状、缺陷及完善

中国行政问责制自“非典”时期正式走近公众视线,目前行政问责制建设取得了不少成绩,但也面临着一系列现实难题与制度缺陷。该文从六个方面为根本上解决行政问责制建设中存在的问题,尽快完成从人治问责向法治问责的转变提出了对策建议。     

技术法规的基本观念反思

我国学者有关技术法规的基本观念多有争议和误解。其实,作为名称,技术法规并非源自对WTO/TBT协定中"Technical regulations"的翻译,而是早在加入WTO之前就已在我国使用。作为概念,它在不同情况下有不同的含义。作为事物,它像法一样是融有关国际与国内,实体与程序,行政、民事与刑事诸法规范于一体的关于技术问题的法律规范体系,在定位上具有复杂性、综合性。而且,在不同情况下它与强制性标准之间在逻辑上至少可能存在种属、等同、整分三种关系。     

我国医疗损害诉讼中专家辅助人制度的现状与建议

2002年《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》规定了民事诉讼中的专家辅助人。2013年修订的《民事诉讼法》中也明确了民事诉讼中的专家辅助人制度。在司法实践中,医疗损害的案件专业性强,并且案件通常都会涉及到医疗损害技术鉴定,这就使得医疗损害案件是民事案件中经常需要专家辅助人的一类案件。本文在剖析了专家辅助人的诉讼地位后,认为我国医疗损害案件中的专家辅助人不同于英美法系中医疗诉讼中的专家证人,也不同于证人、鉴定人和诉讼代理人。在此基础上,探讨了医学专家辅助人在医疗损害案件诉讼的实际应用,并针对现有相关规定中不明确的地方提出了完善医疗损害诉讼中专家辅助人制度的建议。