To Wonderland Through the Looking-glass: Conceiving a Critical Legal Argument for Contractual Justice in the South African Law of Contract †

The aim of this paper is to identify the possible substructure (looking glass/es) of a critical legal argument for contractual justice (Wonderland) in the South African law of contract. South African contract law still fails, ten years after the constitutional transformation, to reflect the constitutional ideals of freedom, equality and human dignity in an acceptable manner. I argue that this disposition places a question mark over the legitimacy of contract law and marginalizes opportunities for the social change envisaged by the Constitution. The paper explores Duncan Kennedy’s Form and Substance-argument and indicates that the reluctance to accommodate these values may be attributable to the fact that the majority of role-players position themselves on the individualism/rules side of Kennedy’s continuum – a paradigm that perceives the law of contract as a body of positivistic rules to be applied neutrally and regardless of the social or socio-economic distortions its application may generate. In an attempt to move away from this traditional approach, the privileged paradigm is criticised. A typical CLS-approach is followed which employs sociology, psychological jurisprudence and game theory to criticise the law from outside the restrictive realms of law itself. Simultaneously, I attempt to illuminate the argument for a shift (step through the looking glass) to another paradigm. I conclude that our judiciary finds itself in a position similar to that of Plato’s prisoners in the cave and will not reach the point where they apply relevant (constitutional) values directly to contractual disputes. The State is thus responsible for infusing contract law with contractual justice, by implementing legislation to this effect in order to limit the hegemonic consequences of the judiciary’s obsession with freedom of contract and utopian rules, which fail in reality to further the ideal of justice. Paper presented at the Critical Legal Conference, 4 September 2004, London, UK. This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Judge of Appeal, Mr. Justice P.J. Olivier. The paper is based on research conducted for the thesis in partial fulfilment of the degree LLD in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria under the title ‘A critical legal argument for contractual justice in the South African law of contract.’ The degree supervisor is Professor Karin van Marle in the Department of Legal History, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence. The author wishes to thank the following persons for valuable deliberations and input: Karin van Marle, Graham Bradfield and Anashri Pillay. In addition, the author wishes to acknowledge and thank the University of Cape Town for financially supporting this research. †Paper presented at the Critical Legal Conference, 4 September 2004, London, UK. This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Judge of Appeal, Mr. Justice P.J. Olivier. The paper is based on research conducted for the thesis in partial fulfilment of the degree LLD in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria under the title ‘A critical legal argument for contractual justice in the South African law of contract.’ The degree supervisor is Professor Karin van Marle in the Department of Legal History, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence. The author wishes to thank the following persons for valuable deliberations and input: Karin van Marle, Graham Bradfield and Anashri Pillay. In addition, the author wishes to acknowledge and thank the University of Cape Town for financially supporting this research. apply relevant (constitutional) values directly to contractual disputes. The State is thus responsible for infusing contract law with contractual justice, by implementing legislation to this effect in order to limit the hegemonic consequences of the judiciary’s obsession with freedom of contract and utopian rules, which fail in reality to further the ideal of justice.     

未来社会新的发展观探祈

确立未来社会新的发展观是面向21世纪全人类无法回避的课题。未来社会新的发展观的基本取向是 :从改造自然、技术、环境等转向改变人类自己。     

简论网络游戏产业的发展

随着网络的发展,网络游戏已经产业化,目前我国网络游戏在产业链中处于弱势地位,其市场的背后也存在着不同程度的混乱现象,必须从政策上、人才上、宣传上加大对于网络游戏研发的支持,加强对于网络游戏不良内容的监管,从各方面促进网络游戏的健康发展。     

论新课程观下的数学教师素质

教师素质是直接影响课程实施的重要因素。因而对新课程观下数学教师应具备的政治素质、专业素质、创新意识、信息技术等方面进行较深入地探讨十分必要。     

从松花江水污染事件检视跨界污染损害责任制度

跨界污染对一国之周边相邻国家和区域乃至全球环境会造成严重危害,产生相应的国际法律责任。以此次松花江水污染事件为视角,凸现了现行立法对跨界污染损害责任制度存在的诸多缺欠和不足。本文提出:应科学界定跨界污染损害概念,导入严格责任,确立国家责任的特点、适用范围、主体和形式。完善相关的预防和赔偿机制是各国间处理跨界污染事件的有效途径,以期实现全球环境和谐可持续发展治理。     

突破筹资瓶颈加快小城镇建设步伐

突破小城镇建设发展的“瓶颈” ,须拓宽融资渠道 ,发挥政府与市场两个积极性。首先要改革和完善城镇财政体制 ,加大政府对小城镇建设的投入 ;其次 ,通过国家财政贴息 ,设立小城镇建设信贷担保基金等方式鼓励金融机构为小城镇建设提供中长期信贷 ;三要面向社会 ,依靠市场 ,多渠道筹集小城镇建设资金 ;四要提高城镇科技含量 ,节省城镇建设资金。     

云南农产品开发创新问题研究

云南是一个以农业为主的省份,有独特的气候、生态环境、多样性的生物物种等优势,可开发利用的农产品种类多,比较优势突出。在中国成为世贸组织成员的今天,云南农业和农产品受到来自国际和国内市场的冲击,我们只有审时度势,大胆地进行创新、才能使云南农产品在省内外增大市场份额,并走向世界。     

《史记》三"书"评议

<史记>篇目问题较多,而又以"八书"为甚.学界虽然对"八书"总体的看法没有什么分歧,但有三点需要注意:其一是<史记>缺少<礼书>、<乐书>和<兵书>,八篇中就有三篇有问题;其二是对<太史公自序>的几句话该怎么理解,<律书>和<兵书>的关系应是怎样的;其三是在司马迁创作"八书"的大前提下,上述三篇中是否还有后人搀入的部分.     

气候变化的国际法发展:从温室效应理论到《联合国气候变化框架公约》

本文考察了温室效应理论对缔结《联合国气候变化框架公约》的决定性影响 ,并对《联合国气候变化框架公约》的基本法律原则 (规则 )及其对国际环境立法的贡献进行了述评。     

浅议邓小平的民主法治思想与人本发展观

崇尚法治,反对人治是邓小平法治思想的基础和核心,民主法治思想与人本发展观的完善是邓小平理论的结晶,它的立法、执法、守法等基本思路对维护社会主义市场经济的新秩序,具有广泛深远的意义。