论程序参与原则在刑事诉讼管辖中的制度实现－兼论刑事诉讼管辖中的当事人权利保障

程序参与是诉讼主体理论在刑事诉讼中的贯彻与反映,是落实诉讼民主,维持诉讼结构平衡的现实需要。把握程序参与原则的内涵和实质要求并予以程序实现,也是管辖冲突的有效解决与管辖制度完善应予解决的问题。在管辖制度设置上应为当事人提供足够的程序参与机会,保证诉讼当事人及其代表对管辖事项的知情权,在管辖权确定过程中赋予诉讼当事人一定的异议权,在管辖权确定程序产生相关裁定或决定后,应该赋予诉讼当事人相关的救济途径。     

Promoting empowerment? The World Bank's Village Investment Project in Kyrgyzstan

This article examines the extent to which the World Bank's community-driven Village Investment Project empowered people to influence the choice of local investments (micro-projects) and to exact accountability from their leaders. It is based on qualitative interviews and group discussions in 16 rural communities. The research demonstrates that the project provided an effective mechanism for responsive infrastructure delivery to address local priority needs. However, it did not improve accountability either within or outside the micro-project boundaries. The project's bottom-up development model was not by itself sufficient to enable people to exercise power over local government officials and informal leaders in the absence of effective horizontal accountability institutions within the state.     

刑法教义学研究的中国主体性

刑法教义学既包括教义学方法,也包括教义学知识;教义学方法是无国界的,但教义学知识是对一国现行有效的法律所作的解释,因而是有国界的。德日刑法关于共同犯罪的规定表明,共犯的定罪与量刑均取决于正犯,因而决定了其共犯理论必须采取实质客观说以区分正犯与共犯;而中国刑法关于共同犯罪的规定表明,共同犯罪的定罪与量刑是截然可分的不同层次,因而在正犯与共犯的区分上采取形式客观说就足以解决问题。中国刑法和德日刑法对侵占罪规定的成立要件并不相同,"拒不退还"、"拒不交出"在中国的侵占罪中是一种客观处罚条件,是独立的行为要件,因而不能将其融入"非法占为已有"的含义之中。中国的刑法教义学研究必须清醒地认识到,要以中国刑法的规定为研究的逻辑起点并受其严格约束;要真正构建中国的刑法教义学,必须唤起研究者的主体意识。     

Silent citizenship among Asian Americans and Latinos: opting out or left out?

In his classic study, Who Governs?, Robert Dahl interpreted the patterns of political assimilation of ‘white ethnic’ immigrants and their children during the mid-twentieth century as a hopeful sign of the potential of democratic pluralism in the USA. While acknowledging that immigrant groups faced discrimination and structural barriers that might lead them to be silent, Dahl predicted that social mobility and assimilation would eventually erase these deficits in political participation among immigrants. Building from Dahl's analysis, we investigate the extent to which pluralism in the USA can and does work the same way for immigrants who are also racial minorities. We highlight factors that can lead these groups to become silent citizens, including lack of legal status, lower levels of political mobilization by institutions, and discrimination as structural impediments to minority participation. Our findings suggest that both resources as well as structural impediments structure the political behavior of Asian Americans and Latinos, determining whether they are vocal citizens or silent citizens.     

实事求是艰难性的认识结构分析及其求解对策

实事求是之所以出现理论与实践的二律背反 ,源于实事求是实现过程中存在着诸多、甚至是难以克服的制约因素。从认识论上看 ,造成实事求是艰难性有主体、客体和中介三方面因素     

论自承包合同的主体定位

虽然企业承包经营责任制是我国特定历史时期的产物 ,但随之而生的企业承包经营合同争议并不鲜见。从企业承包经营合同中企业经营者的合同主体地位 ,以及相关制度设计中的缺陷及影响不难看出 ,企业经营者始终是承包经营合同的主体 ,而实行承包经营的企业不具有合同主体地位。     

全面建设小康社会与弱势群体的政治参与问题

本文阐述了弱势群体政治参与的含义,探讨了在全面建设小康社会条件下发展和扩大弱势群体政治参与的途径和趋势。     

晚近我国犯罪学的新发展

我国犯罪学自上世纪70年代末80年代初形成以来,取得了丰硕的成果。尤其是近几年,我国犯罪学界针对犯罪学的学科性质与地位、犯罪学研究的对象与方法、犯罪学的实践运用等重大课题进行了深入的研究与探讨,取得了突破性的进展,为我国犯罪学的发展奠定了坚实的基础,为进一步研究和应用犯罪学指明了方向。     

理性市场秩序呼唤道德支持——规范市场秩序的伦理思考

市场秩序混乱是我国当前经济生活中十分突出的问题.本文对这一经济现象从伦理道德的角度加以审视,认为理性的市场秩序既是一种经济秩序,也是一种伦理道德秩序.市场失序不仅源于制度约束机制的软化,在更深层次上,它是转型时期社会伦理道德失范在经济领域的反映,是伦理上层建筑对经济生活反作用的集中表现.因此,道德秩序是市场秩序的精神支柱,活而有序的市场机制的建立既要有完备的法规体系作保障,又要有相应的伦理价值观念予以支撑.