国家助学贷款政策法律分析

助学贷款政策是国家为了利用金融手段支持高等教育体制的深化改革,促进我国教育事业发展的重要举措。实施9年来,资助了300多万贫困学子完成了学业,受到人民群众的普遍欢迎。但是,这个政策从实施那一天起就伴随着银行惜贷,学生违约等制约助学贷款制度的良性发展的问题。从法律层面上分析,提升国家助学贷款的立法层次、完善制度设计、厘清各种法律关系,明确当事人的权利义务,是实现助学贷款制度良性循环的良策。     

法治话语、法律议论的公众型构过程与背景——以社会诉讼为载体

将民主讨论的过程及其效果置于特定语境之中,并引入到“社会诉讼”的分析手段中解读,可以发现法律议论的型构过程是复线并动态互构的,理想逻辑与社会伦理的讨论场景下的博弈效果呈现非均质的状态,并以对话方式走向沟通与共识。     

析我省刑事附带民事执法从宽执行新规定

2007年6月,云南省高级法院、省检察院、省公安厅、省司法厅联合出台的《关于在刑事执法活动中贯彻宽严相济刑事司法政策的实施意见》规定:法院在审理刑事附带民事案件时,被告人行为危害不大,只要积极赔偿被害人,取得被害人谅解的,法院在量刑方面从轻考虑。这一规定,有利于解决法院"执行难"的问题,有利于化解被告人与被害人双方之间的矛盾,起到了法律效果和社会效果的统一。     

"以人为本"与"依法治国"的价值定位

“以人为本”与“依法治国”有密切的关系,主要是基于“以人为本”确定依法治国的目的性价值及“以人为本”思想有助于真正推动法治的实现两个方面。     

关于我国职务犯罪刑事立法的思考

随着我国经济建设的发展,腐败现象迅速孳生。以权钱交易、权力滥用为特征的职务犯罪是腐败的典型表现,其在刑事犯罪中所呈现出的蔓延之势,引起人们广泛的关注。文章在简介职务犯罪概念的基础之上,分析了目前我国职务犯罪的刑事立法存在的缺陷,并探讨了预防与惩治职务犯罪刑事立法的完善。     

Building informal knowledge‐sharing relationships between policy makers and academics: Insights from a PM&C engagement project

This article outlines an innovative project to encourage knowledge sharing and engagement between academics and a policy team within the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C). The project was designed to enhance policy advice by drawing on a group of academics outside the policy ranks to act as a sounding board, to question, and provide differing perspectives within the policy process of crafting advice to government. External expertise and particularly academic research has the potential to improve evidence‐based policy but often fails to be specific or timely for those at the “pointy end” of policy decision making. An informal knowledge sharing framework has the potential to improve the exchange of information through confidential and targeted conversations between researchers and public servants as one way of overcoming these barriers.     

Mobilising evidence in public policy: The contribution of the evidence provider

This article contributes to the conceptualisation of evidence‐based policy through providing a framework of the key factors that influence research utilisation, including those that shape the quality of evidence provided. We apply this framework to an analysis of public policy to regulate the remuneration of freight truck drivers to improve workplace safety in their industry. Recent policymaking concerning the regulation of truck drivers’ remuneration in Australia provides an opportunity to examine the quality and utilisation of research evidence by external evidence providers in opposing political contexts. This article suggests the need for informed and vigilant scrutiny of the contributions of evidence providers to government policymaking, particularly in the case of wicked policy problems about which there are sustained ideological differences that underpin problematisation, research interpretation, and conceivable policy solutions.     

论ICSID仲裁庭对公平公正待遇标准的发展——兼评AES Summit、AES-Tisza诉Hungary案

近年来,国际投资争端中的公平公正待遇标准在ICSID仲裁庭的实践中有了一定的发展。文章首先按时间顺序分阶段梳理该仲裁庭对公平公正待遇标准的界定,随后结合最新的裁决实践,评价公平公正待遇标准要素的发展现状。在此基础上,试图寻找仲裁庭对公平公正待遇标准要素的发展特征。在把握公平公正待遇标准内涵发展趋势的前提下,我们应积极思考并研究我国及投资者的相应对策。     

论外商投资合同法律效力争议解决

本文所称外商投资合同法律效力争议,是一个较为宽泛的概念,它不仅包括外商在中国境内直接投资签署的中外合资/合作经营企业合同及其变更的法律效力所产生之争议,也包括外资并购合同法律效力产生之争议,还包括外商投资中企境外企业所签署的合同法律效力所产生之争议。本文意图通过对上述三种不同形式的外商投资合同法律效力所产生之争议的不同方面进行比较研究,从而找出正确的解决这些争议的方法,以供业内人士、仲裁员、律师参考。