排序方式: 共有11条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Eva-Clarita Onken 《欧亚研究》2007,59(1):23-46
This article develops a three-level framework for analysing the role of memory in contemporary European politics. It tests the utility of this framework based on the three Baltic states and their public and political debates around the World War II anniversary commemorations in Moscow in 2005. Existing concepts for analysing the impact of memory on policy decisions are discussed first on the levels of domestic politics and bilateral relations. The article then provides a framework for researching a lesser acknowledged third level of memory politics within European institutions. The dilemma felt by the three Baltic presidents over whether or not to attend the Moscow ceremonies provides a unique opportunity to look at all three levels and demonstrate their relevance for understanding future memory struggles in an enlarged Europe. 相似文献
2.
3.
Eva-Clarita Pettai 《Journal of Baltic studies》2016,47(2):165-178
This is a debate article about a volume by Michael Bernhard and Jan Kubik, who put forth a novel analytical framework for comparing memory regimes in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. The article briefly outlines the model, debates the results of the Baltic chapter in the volume, offers a more rigorous comparative application of the original framework to these cases, and finally provides a methodological critique with regard to the comparative study of memory politics more broadly. 相似文献
4.
Kreuzer Marcus Pettai Vello 《Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID)》2003,38(2):76-98
In contrast to established party systems, the transformation of post-communist party systems is not only shaped by shifts
in electoral preferences, but also by the changing organizational loyalties of politicians. Post-communist politicians pursue
a wide range of organizational strategies such as party fusions, fissions, start-ups, and interparty switching. By focusing
on the interaction between these organizational strategies and voters’ electoral preferences, we argue that the seeming instability
of post-communist party systems actually reveals distinct patterns of political change. The article develops an analytical
framework, which incorporates politician-driven interparty mobility and voter-induced electoral change. It uses this framework
to show that the apparently inchoate party systems of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania actually follow definable modes of transformation.
Marcus Kreuzer is assistant professor of political science at Villanova University. His work focuses on how electoral and
legislative institutions shape the organizational and electioneering practices of parties in interwar Europe and post-communist
democracies. He also is studying the origins of liberal democracy in nineteenth century Europe. He is author ofInstitutions and Innovation—Voters, Politicians and Interest Groups in the Consolidation of Democracy: France and Germany,
1870–1939 (2001).
Vello Pettai is lecturer in political science at the University of Tartu, Estonia. He specializes in comparative ethnopolitics
and party politics. He has published previously inNations and Nationalism, Post-Soviet Affairs, East European Politics and Society, andJournal of Democracy.
We would like to thank for Artis Pabriks and Darius Zeruolis for sharing their knowledge of Latvian and Lithuanian party politics
as well as John T. Ishiyama, Scott Desposato, and two anonymous SCID reviewers for commenting on an earlier draft. Funding
for this research came from an Estonian Science Foundation grant, nr. 4904. We gratefully acknowledge their support. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.