Book reviews

The Imaginary War: Understanding the East‐West Conflict By Mary Kaldor. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1990. 290 pp. £19.95.

The Nonsuperpowers and South Africa ‐ Implications for U.S. Policy. By Richard J. Payne. Indiana University Press. 336 pp. $35.00.

Elites and the Idea of Equality: A Comparison of Japan, Sweden, and the United States. By Sidney Verba, Steven Kelman, Gary R. Orten, Ichiro Miyake, Joji Watonuki, Ikuo Kabashima, G. Donald Ferreer, Jr. Harvard University Press. 276 pp. £10.25.

Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security By Bruce Russett. 261 pp. £17.95.

America's Germany: John J. McCloy and the Federal Republic of Germany By Thomas Alan Schwartz. Harvard University Press: 1991. 404 pp. £23.95.     

City of Illusions,layers of deceit,and the sterility of isolation

Ursula K. Le Guin frequently uses the genre of science fiction/fantasy to explore power relationships between cultures. This paper examines an early and neglected work, City of Illusions, within the context of post‐colonial criticism to show that the novel is in fact a highly sophisticated political parable. The novel depicts a colonized Earth under the control of an extragalactic power which employs many of the strategies for control used by the hegemonic powers of the past and present. Essentially, the novel explores how these methods of manipulation and control work, the effects they have on the colonized societies, and colonized peoples' strategies of resistance. The novel makes use of a series of metaphors to convey these ideas.     

Learning from Conflict

Efforts to achieve comprehensive international agreement on measures against international terrorism through the United Nations have failed until now. In a review of United Nations proceedings on the subject since 1972 the author sets forth the principal issues that have occupied the minds of the participants. Chief among them was the question of the scope and effect of a condemnation of international terrorism. Agreement on what the term itself included could not be reached because of fears of the adverse effect of a condemnation on existing struggles for national liberation and self‐determination. Nor could agreement be had that violence for the achievement of political ends should be confined to the areas of actual tension. Hence, there could be no common understanding on the question of who were to be regarded as “innocent” victims. The author concludes with a suggestion that a step‐by‐step effort might have yielded a better outcome.