排序方式: 共有2条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Willemijn Verkoren 《发展研究杂志》2013,49(4):790-810
Literature and policies on learning by NGOs focus on internal processes in Northern organisations. This article examines the learning processes of Southern NGOs by studying peacebuilding organisations in several African and Asian countries. These organisations learn mostly in an interactive way, emphasising exchange with other practitioners and beneficiaries. However, these learning strategies are limited by competition and distrust among SNGOs and by the imposition of policy by donors. SNGOs feel constrained particularly in doing research and documenting local knowledge, activities for which they lack the time and skills, but which potentially could strengthen their role in international debates and policymaking. 相似文献
2.
Willemijn Tuinstra 《International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics》2008,8(1):35-49
This paper examines the question whether the scientific knowledge framework produced in the context of the Convention on Long-range
Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) can keep its credibility, legitimacy and relevance when used in a different policy arena,
e.g. the European Commission (EC) of the European Union. The paper combines a conceptual framework for considering effective
assessments with the notion of boundary work and co-production of science and policy to examine differences between the roles
and division of tasks between scientists and policy makers in the two different policy contexts. The paper concludes that,
despite the differences between the two policy settings, user characteristics and the historical context are to a certain
extent similar in LRTAP and the EU Clean Air for Europe Programme (CAFE), and that participants in the two processes partially
overlap and tackle the same policy problem. The scientific knowledge framework as developed within LRTAP can maintain credibility,
legitimacy and relevance when it is used in CAFE if certain conditions are fulfilled. One condition is the effective functioning
of LRTAP, because the CAFE assessment process remains also dependent on the LRTAP process. Data collection and mapping efforts
in the context of LRTAP form also the basis for the analyses within CAFE. Furthermore, a broadly embedded scientific basis
is needed in the countries to enable each country to follow or relate to the analyses commissioned by the EU. The conceptual
framework and concept of boundary work used in this paper turned out to be helpful in focusing on the dynamic relationship
between science and policy.
相似文献
Willemijn TuinstraEmail: |
1