首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   631篇
  免费   22篇
各国政治   13篇
工人农民   72篇
世界政治   46篇
外交国际关系   25篇
法律   343篇
中国政治   7篇
政治理论   138篇
综合类   9篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   7篇
  2021年   7篇
  2020年   13篇
  2019年   27篇
  2018年   21篇
  2017年   29篇
  2016年   26篇
  2015年   20篇
  2014年   18篇
  2013年   82篇
  2012年   20篇
  2011年   21篇
  2010年   25篇
  2009年   20篇
  2008年   23篇
  2007年   29篇
  2006年   19篇
  2005年   12篇
  2004年   18篇
  2003年   21篇
  2002年   10篇
  2001年   11篇
  2000年   18篇
  1999年   13篇
  1998年   11篇
  1997年   5篇
  1996年   5篇
  1995年   8篇
  1994年   6篇
  1993年   3篇
  1992年   8篇
  1991年   7篇
  1990年   5篇
  1989年   11篇
  1988年   5篇
  1987年   9篇
  1986年   8篇
  1985年   6篇
  1984年   6篇
  1983年   3篇
  1982年   3篇
  1981年   3篇
  1980年   2篇
  1979年   11篇
  1978年   5篇
  1977年   2篇
  1974年   3篇
  1969年   2篇
  1968年   1篇
排序方式: 共有653条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
ABSTRACT

Recently, “problem-solving” courts have been developed as an alternative to imprisonment. They are often called “specialty” courts because they process and divert into treatment programs offenders who are seen as different from the general criminal population, such as those with mental health or drug problems, those who are homeless or veterans, and those who engage in domestic violence. Based on a 2017 national survey of 1,000 respondents, the current study examines overall public support for rehabilitation as a goal of corrections and then focuses specifically on support for different types of specialty courts. The analysis reveals that the American public endorses not only the rehabilitative ideal but also the use of problem-solving courts. Further, with only minimal variation, strong support for these courts appears to exist regardless of political orientation and sociodemographic characteristics.  相似文献   
2.
What is the relationship between security policies and democratic debate, oversight and rights? Does coping with security threats require exceptions to the rule of law and reductions of liberties? The inquiry that follows tries to answer such questions in the context of the European Union and takes the case of biometric identification, an area were security considerations and the possible impact on fundamental rights and the rule of law are at stake. Some hypotheses are explored through the case study: “securitisation” and “democratisation” are in tension but some hybrid strategies can emerge; the plurality of “authoritative actors” influences policy frames and outcomes; and knowledge is a key asset in defining these authoritative actors. A counter-intuitive conclusion is presented, namely that biometrics, which seems prima facie an excellent candidate for technocratic decision-making, sheltered from democratic debate and accountability – is characterised by debate by a plurality of actors. Such pluralism is limited to those actors who have the resources – including knowledge – that allow for inclusion in policy making at EU level, but is nevertheless significant in shaping policy; it explains the central role of the metaphor of balancing security and democracy, as well as the “competitive cooperation” between new and more consolidated policy areas. The EU is facing another difficult challenge in the attempt at establishing itself as a new security actor and as a supranational democratic polity: important choices are at stake to assure that citizens’ security is pursued on the basis of the rule of law, respect of fundamental rights and democratic accountability.  相似文献   
3.
4.
5.
6.
Abstract. Western natural law theory emphasises the derivation of principles of right action said to be universal and objective from the application of practical reasonableness to the pursuit of basic human goods that are self‐evident or based on human nature. Critics say its methodology is inherently subjective. In contrast, the Vedic approach to natural law of the Bhagavad‐Gita emphasises the full development of a universal aspect of human nature—consciousness—to promote right action. A healthy person with a developed intellect, clear mind, balanced emotions and full perception is best placed to fulfil his or her society's highest ideals of ethical and lawful conduct. The Vedic approach advocates a supportive social environment and the use of meditation techniques to promote such development. Research has found that the Transcendental Meditation (TM) program promotes improvement in mind, body and behaviour. For example, offenders in Australia, the United States and Senegal practising the technique experienced decreased substance abuse and recidivism and improved wellbeing. From a scientific perspective, TM promotes these improvements by producing a unique psychophysiological state of restful alertness that dissolves stress that blocks the unfoldment of full potential in life.  相似文献   
7.
8.
9.
10.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号