Corporate environmental responsibility and criminology

This article addresses corporate environmental responsibility (CER) and aims to present a criminological analysis of it. We studied the opinion of a number of principle actors involved in CER in Europe in order to determine how they perceive it in terms of its definition, aetiology and approaches. For each of these dimensions we relate back to a criminological framework to ascertain how it is positioned in the green criminological debate. We start out by providing information on what corporate environmental responsibility is and how it relates to corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Then we outline the theoretical framework in accordance with the three central themes for the criminological analysis of CER: definition, aetiology and approaches. We also explain the method that was used (semi-structured interviews). Next, we present the results according to the same threefold structure. Finally we discuss these results in a last part, which is divided in two. First, we look at the challenges that the criminological perspective poses for CER in terms of definition, aetiology and approaches. The second part of the discussion turns the question around and wonders how CER could contribute to greening criminology.     

Is it all going to waste? Illegal transports of e-waste in a European trade hub

This article responds to the call for more empirical knowledge about transnational environmental crime. It does so by analysing the case of illegal transports of electronic waste (e-waste) in a European trade hub. Given the complexity and global nature of transnational environmental crime, it is difficult to determine which actors are involved. In this regard, a local research setting allows the actors involved in illegal transports of e-waste to be identified. This research tries to determine whether these actors and their roles can be considered legal or illegal and illustrates the legal-illegal interfaces in e-waste flows. Moreover, this case study analyses the push, pull and facilitating factors and therefore looks at what motivations and opportunities shape the flows of e-waste in locations of origin, transit and destination. The results show that the social organisation and emergence of transnational environmental crime is on a thin line between legal and illegal which needs to be contextualised within the global reality of the locations of origin, transit and destination.     

Lipitor battle in the Netherlands--District Court invalidates Warner-Lambert's EP '281 and holds EP '633 infringed

In the continuing Lipitor (atorvastatin) battle between theIndian company Ranbaxy and Pfizer/Warner-Lambert, the DistrictCourt of The Hague held that Ranbaxy's generic atorvastatinfalls within the scope of protection of EP '633, the main patentcovering atorvastatin, and invalidated another atorvastatinpatent, EP '281.     

Pañcārtha Before Kauṇḍinya

The term Pañcārtha in the title of Kau??inya’s commentary on the Pā?upatasūtra, the Pañcārthabhā?ya, is usually taken to refer to the five categories (padārtha) distinguished by Kau??inya: Kārya, Kāra?a, Yoga, Vidhi, and Du?khānta. The term in fact also occurs in a string of verses quoted by Kau??inya in his commentary on Pā?upatasūtra 5.30, indicating that it was already in use in Pā?upata circles before him. In these verses the term Pañcārtha is used in a different sense. These and other passages in the Pañcārthabhā?ya are examined to identify an earlier phase of Pā?upata thought, and to consider the role of the author of the Bhā?ya in developing the Pā?upata doctrine.