排序方式: 共有14条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Hardarson Ólafur Th. Kristinsson Gunnar Helgi 《European Journal of Political Research》2000,38(3-4):408-419
European Journal of Political Research - 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
The advent of large-scale, population genetic databases (PGDs) in several countries around the world marks a significant development in human DNA banking and genetic research. The European countries that have led the way in the development of PGDs are Iceland, Sweden, Estonia and the U.K. In legal terms, the emergence of PGDs has been far from straightforward as such projects pose a range of difficult and complex issues for the law to address. This article canvasses the current law in Iceland, Estonia, Sweden and the U.K. on four fundamental issues of principle pertaining to PGDs, in order to illustrate the difficulties that have emerged around PGDs, highlight key areas of legal concern, and shed light on possible ways forward. It compares and contrasts the differing legal positions and lawmakers' responses to date in these four European countries that have established PGDs or are seeking to do so. The four fundamental issues examined are: (1) consent, especially for secondary research purposes; (2) ownership of biological samples, data and databases; (3) the rights of certain third parties to gain access to, and to use, PGD biological samples and data; and (4) benefit sharing, including the provision of feedback and genetic counselling to participants. This analysis may offer some guidance for policymakers in other jurisdictions where PGDs have been proposed or are being established. 相似文献
6.
7.
Ólafur Th. Hardarson Gunnar Helgi Kristinsson 《European Journal of Political Research》2003,42(7-8):975-978
8.
Tom Christensen Mads Dagnis Jensen Michael Kluth Gunnar Helgi Kristinsson Kennet Lynggaard Per Lægreid Risto Niemikari Jon Pierre Tapio Raunio Gústaf Adolf Skúlason 《Regulation & Governance》2023,17(3):658-676
Government responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in the Nordic states—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden—exhibit similarities and differences. This article investigates the extent to which crisis policymaking diverges from normal policymaking within the Nordic countries and whether variations between the countries are associated with the role of expertise and the level of politicization. Government responses are analyzed in terms of governance arrangements and regulatory instruments. Findings demonstrate some deviation from normal policymaking within and considerable variation between the Nordic countries, as Denmark, Finland, and to some extent Norway exhibit similar patterns with hierarchical command and control governance arrangements, while Iceland, in some instances, resembles the case of Sweden, which has made use of network-based governance. The article shows that the higher the influence of experts, the more likely it is that the governance arrangement will be network-based. 相似文献
9.
10.