行政管理费大幅攀升的原因及遏制路径探析

行政管理工作的正常运行需要一定的行政经费作保证。随着社会的发展,行政管理费用逐渐增加是必然的,而行政管理费大幅攀升却违背了公共权力的来源和行使目的,是与构建法治、廉洁、高效、服务型政府相悖的。行政管理费用大幅攀升的原因跟公务员的思想认识、历史文化、心理积淀和社会风气等因素有关,从这些方面着手就能够找到遏制行政管理费用大幅攀升的路径。     

Parenting Style and Bullying and Victimization: Comparing Foreign-Born Asian,U.S.-Born Asian,and White American Adolescents

Journal of Family Violence - The purpose of the study is to explore whether the association between types of parenting styles and bullying and victimization are similar across White American,...     

长寿关键靠自己--中科院院士钱伟长的养生之道

年逾九旬的钱伟长,是一个传奇式的老人.早在20世纪60年代,他就与钱学森、钱三强被周恩来总理称为我国科学家中成就卓越的"三钱".他也是我国目前在位的最年长的大学校长.     

设立知识产权法院的现实选择

2014年8月31日，十二届全国人大常委会第十次会议通过了《关于在北京、上海、广州设立知识产权法院的决定》（以下简称《决定》），中国设立知识产权专门法院的法律方案正式出台。对于知识产权事业发展及司法体制改革来说，《决定》尽管带有“试点”的性质，但它仍不失为具有里程碑式的意义。它既是建设创新型国家的重大举措，也奠定了知识产权司法制度的发展基础。     

Public Finance and Budgeting in Korea under Democracy: A Critical Appraisal

The Republic of Korea has been widely acknowledged as one of the few success stories of economic development in the second half of the twentieth century. The state has had a large role in guiding the economic development through policies and subsidization. However, with political democratization and economic liberalization, the politico-economic context of Korea's public finance policy began to change dramatically. The purpose of this article is to analyze how Korea's public finance policy has changed under the newly installed democracy. It specifically discusses the public finance and budgeting policies during the Roh Tae Woo administration (1988–1992) and the Kim Young Sam administration (1993 to the present).     

期刊编辑工作中的著作权保护问题探析

在期刊编辑工作中,往往涉及到作者权益的保护问题。我国《著作权法》对作者的署名权、修改权等都有明确的规定。编辑是出版活动的主体,在编辑活动中处于主导地位,在依法治国,建设社会主义法治国家的今天,期刊编辑工作人员必须增强著作权意识,在编辑工作中切实维护作者的合法权益。     

Lessons from the Asian Economic Crisis: A View from South Korea

Ha and Kim present a new reading of the East Asian crisis, focusing particularly on South Korea's experience. They argue that previous studies have ignored the political environment that paved the way for such an event. Neoliberal economists, according to the authors, were so enamoured with the example of the 'Asian tigers' and the ideal of unregulated markets that they were blind to the many warnings of an ensuing disaster. Economic systems can thus no longer rest on such a free-market capitalist ideal where no one controls the global economy, but must instead have a secure political base. As the financial crisis has shown, such international anarchy must be checked by a new set of international institutions. While the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) organisation did attempt to handle the crisis, it, along with Japan and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), proved unable to do so. East Asia's leaders and theorists have been presented with the challenge of reforming this region's institutions and political orders in order to avoid another crisis, complete with all its social and political ramifications.     

构建东北亚IT共同体的设想及影响其制度化的因素

如果能够在东北亚地区建立IT产业的共同体,将很有可能带动其他产业的联合,最终走向全面地联合,从而提升东北亚地区合作的层次。东北亚国家已经开始在IT领域进行了一定程度的合作,但是在东北亚地区建立IT共同体的道路不会是一帆风顺的,有许多因素会影响到东北亚IT共同体的最终形成。     

The Role of National Human Rights Institutions in the Implementation of the UN Guiding Principles

National human rights institutions (NHRIs) are key domestic mechanisms for promotion and protection of human rights. The institutions' broad mandate, competencies, and special status between state and nonstate actors on the one hand, and special status between the national and international levels on the other hand enable them to engage effectively in the field of business and human rights. Since 2009, NHRIs have been engaging with the international human rights system in order to increase understanding and raise awareness of their role in addressing business and human rights issues. As a result, they have contributed to the development of the UN “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework and obtained an evolving role within all pillars of the framework and in its implementation. This paper presents how these domestic institutions, bridging the national and international levels, fit into the UN legal regime for corporate responsibility for human rights and what contribution they make to the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles.