以积极姿态迎接新《未成年人保护法》的实施

2006年12月29日，十届全国人大常委会第二十五次会议以154票赞成、2票弃权，表决通过的新《未成年人保护法》将于今年6月1日起正式施行。与原先的《未成年人保护法》比较，修订后的新法律有许多创新和亮点，不仅明确了“未成年人享有生存权、发展权、受保护权、参与权等权利，国家根据未成年人身心发展特点给予特殊、优先保护，保障未成年人的合法权益不受侵犯”等重要内容，还就涉及未成年人身心健康发展的许多方面作了明确和具体规定，例如：禁止向未成年人出售烟酒；不得在未成年人集中活动的室内饮酒、吸烟；老师辱骂学生要受到惩处；学校不得延长未成年学生在校学习时间；     

Editor's note

This study applies Elisabeth Noelle‐Neumann's spiral of silence theory to the controversial issue of whether children with AIDS should be allowed to attend public school. The study tests the theory's hypotheses in light of two content analyses of the media's treatment of the issue. The findings offer tentative and qualified support for Noelle‐Neumann's theoretical propositions about the relationship between individuals' perceptions of the issue and the media's tenor of the issue; particularly that of television. The findings suggest the need to address the role of other agents of influence, including reference groups, and to use time‐based data to unravel the causal order of the relationships.     

Structuring the Debate on Consolidation: A Response to Leland and Thurmaier

In their essay "When Efficiency Is Unbelievable: Normative Lessons from 30 Years of City–County Consolidations," published in the July/August 2005 issue of PAR , Leland and Thurmaier make an important contribution to understanding how city–county consolidation occurs. They revise the widely accepted Rosenbaum and Kammerer model of consolidation and posit that "strong arguments" based on economic development, especially in the absence of organized opposition, led to victory for consolidation advocates. In this response, we argue that efforts to identify a set of arguments or charter provisions that will lead to successful consolidation are misguided. The real story in consolidation campaigns is how participants use heresthetical arguments in an effort to turn their opponents into political losers. What makes arguments strong or weak is not their substantive policy focus, but how they are structured.