首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1篇
  免费   0篇
法律   1篇
  2009年   1篇
排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Notwithstanding a few seminal precursors from the late 1980s,it is only with the new century that the modelling of reasoningon legal evidence has emerged as a significant area within thewell-established field of AI & Law (active since the 1970s).An overview such as the one in this article has never appearedbefore in the literature. It is three-pronged: it is about themodelling of reasoning about legal evidence, about tools forlegal argumentation, and about select areas in forensic science.For newcomers into the modelling of legal evidence by meansof AI techniques, it is essentialnot to simplistically blunderinto such design choices that would result in flaws making thetools unusable by legal professionals, so it is important tobe aware of ongoing controversies. Other tools are appropriatefor law enforcement, e.g., tools assisting in crime analysis.In the compass of this article, we only very briefly deal withthe modelling of arguments as such, and we only sketchily forayinto forensic science, by selecting some areas within it byway of exemplification.  相似文献   
1
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号