排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1
1.
Schacter DL Dawes R Jacoby LL Kahneman D Lempert R Roediger HL Rosenthal R 《Law and human behavior》2008,32(1):3-5
This article considers methodological issues arising from recent efforts to provide field tests of eyewitness identification
procedures. We focus in particular on a field study (Mecklenburg 2006) that examined the “double blind, sequential” technique,
and consider the implications of an acknowledged methodological confound in the study. We explain why the confound has severe
consequences for assessing the real-world implications of this study. 相似文献
1