The International Criminal Court and the Lord’s Resistance Army Leaders: Prosecution or Amnesty?

Netherlands International Law Review -     

State Withdrawal Notifications from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: South Africa,Burundi and the Gambia

In 2016 three African states namely South Africa, Burundi and The Gambia submitted written notifications of withdrawal from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute) to the Secretary-General of the United Nations pursuant to Article 127 of the Rome Statute. Although the African Union welcomed and fully supported the three withdrawal notifications and considered them as ‘pioneer implementers’ of its ‘Withdrawal Strategy’, The Gambia and South Africa withdrew their notifications of withdrawal. Some other states – Kenya, Namibia and Uganda – have made threats to submit withdrawal notifications. This article examines four issues arising out of the said withdrawal notifications. First, why did the three states submit withdrawal notifications from the Rome Statute? Second, what is the impact of the three states’ withdrawal notifications? Third, is the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights (or the yet-to-be-established African Court of Justice and Human and Peoples’ Rights) a suitable African regional ‘alternative’ to the ICC? Finally, what steps might be taken to avoid, or at least minimise, further withdrawals in the future and to avoid impunity of perpetrators of international crimes in states that have withdrawn from the Rome Statute?     

The Islamic Veil and Freedom of Religion, the Rights to Education and Work: a Survey of Recent International and National Cases

The wearing of the female Islamic dress (generally referredto as the hijab), or any feature of this dress such as the headscarf(khimar), face veil (niqab) and the head-to-toe all envelopinggarment (jilbab) is a complex and multi-faceted issue that isoften raised in public debate in most European States in recentyears particularly in the education and employment areas. Thisarticle analyses the selected State practice and judicial decisionson the banning and similar restrictions to the wearing of theIslamic dress in State schools. Two issues are analysed: (i)whether the prohibition of female Muslim pupils or studentsfrom wearing the Islamic dress, or any feature of the Islamicdress, while at State schools amounts to an unjustifiable violationof the right to education and/or an unjustifiable violationof freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs and (ii) ifa State (or a non-State actor) prohibits a female Muslim teacherfrom wearing the Islamic dress while at a State school, doesthis amount to a violation of the teacher's right to work and/orthe teacher's right to manifest freedom of religion or belief?     

Women's Rights to Equality and Non-discrimination: Discriminatory Family Legislation in Uganda and the Role of Uganda's Constitutional Court

In 1995 Uganda adopted the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda1995 which protected a wide range of human rights includingwomen's rights to equality and freedom from discrimination.Article 33(6) of the Constitution prohibited ‘laws, customsor traditions which are against the dignity, welfare or interestof women’. However, more than ten years later legislation,customary laws and practices have continued to be in force largelydue to the lack of political will to confront issues of inequalityand discrimination in a holistic and comprehensive manner. Thisarticle examines such discriminatory laws against women andthe jurisprudence of Uganda's Constitutional Court in the areasof divorce, criminalization of adultery, succession and marriagelaws. Using a comparative approach, it observes that these lawsconflict with Uganda's Constitution as well as regional andinternational human rights treaties to which Uganda is a Stateparty. It recommends that discriminatory laws should be harmonizedwith principles of equality and non-discrimination, and advocatesfor a litigation strategy.