The promotion of peace education through guides in peace museums. A case study of the Kyoto Museum for World Peace,Ritsumeikan University

This paper focuses on how peace education at a peace museum is promoted by a volunteer guide service for visitors. Peace museums are places where many materials related to war and peace history are on display. To support the learning experience of museum visitors, many peace museums in Japan provide a volunteer guide service. The Kyoto Museum for World Peace, Ritsumeikan University, started such a service more than 20 years ago. A citizens’ group, called Friends for Peace, is in charge of the museum guide activities in cooperation with the museum. This article explains the purposes and nature of the service, and also reports on a survey of similar services offered by other peace museums in Japan.     

Culture in transition: Awareness and appropriate response to domestic violence among Hmong American college students

This explanatory study examined Hmong college students’ experience, awareness, and appropriate response to domestic violence in the Hmong community, using a survey (n?=?231) at one of the largest Hmong-serving institutions in the United States. Findings indicated that 32.8% of Hmong college women had some violence from their romantic partners and two thirds of Hmong college men and women were aware of violence in the Hmong community. Those young generation Hmong reported that the most appropriate method to solve conflicts within the Hmong community is through the traditional clan system. These results can be used to begin formulating research-based cultural competence education for providers in the criminal justice system and facilitate discussions on youth perceptions.     

A review of the evolution and state of transboundary freshwater treaties

Internationally shared basins supply 60 % of global freshwater supply, are home to about 1/3 of the world’s population, and are focal points for interstate conflict and, as importantly, cooperation. To manage these waters, states have developed a large set of formal treaties, but until now these treaties have been difficult to access and systematically assess. This paper presents and makes publicly available the assembly and organization of the largest known collection of transboundary water agreements in existence. We apply for the first time a “lineage” concept to differentiate between independent agreements and groups of legally related texts, spatially reference the texts to a global basin database, and identify agreement purposes, goals and a variety of content areas. The 688 agreements identified were signed between 1820 and 2007 and constitute 250 independent treaties which apply to 113 basins. While the scope and content varies widely, these treaties nominally govern almost 70 % of the world’s transboundary basin area. In terms of content, treaties have shifted from an earlier focus on regulation and development of water resources to the management of resources and the setting of frameworks for that management. While “traditional” issues such as hydropower, water allocation and irrigation are still important, the environment is now the most commonly mentioned issue in treaty texts. Treaties are also increasingly likely to include data and information sharing provisions, have conflict resolution mechanisms, and include mechanisms for participation beyond traditional nation-state actors. Generalizing, treaties have become more comprehensive over time, both in the issues they address and the tools they use to manage those issues cooperatively.     

Improving Data Quality: Actors, Incentives, and Capabilities

Devesh Kapur Centre for Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 560, Philadelphia, PA 19104 e-mail: dkapur{at}sas.upenn.edu e-mail: herrera{at}fas.harvard.edu (corresponding author) This paper examines the construction and use of data sets inpolitical science. We focus on three interrelated questions:How might we assess data quality? What factors shape data quality?and How can these factors be addressed to improve data quality?We first outline some problems with existing data set quality,including issues of validity, coverage, and accuracy, and wediscuss some ways of identifying problems as well as some consequencesof data quality problems. The core of the paper addresses thesecond question by analyzing the incentives and capabilitiesfacing four key actors in a data supply chain: respondents,data collection agencies (including state bureaucracies andprivate organizations), international organizations, and finally,academic scholars. We conclude by making some suggestions forimproving the use and construction of data sets. Authors' note: For generous comments at many stages in the paper,the authors would like to thank Dawn Brancati, Bear Braumoeller,Kanchan Chandra, Jorge Dominguez, Errol D'Souza, Richard Grossman,Ana Grzymala-Busse, Andrew Kydd, David Laitin, Daniel Posner,Jasjeet Sekhon, Hillel Soifer, Jessica Wallack, and Steven Wilkinsonand the Comparative Politics Research Workshop at Harvard University,and the anonymous reviewers from Political Analysis. The authorstake full responsibility for any errors. An earlier versionof this paper was presented at the American Political ScienceAssociation Annual Meetings, Boston, MA, August 2002.