Limiting aspects of contracting out in transitional countries: the case of Estonian prisons

Estonia, being one of the most diligent students of the neo‐liberal economic paradigm among the Central and Eastern European transitional countries, has declared that private organisations should be given the chance to operate public prisons. This article argues that in spite of the promising perspective of this idea, the transitional context mixed with the complex nature of incarceration services, sets serious limits for a successful application of the initiative. After identifying four key sources of limiting factors of contracting out, which concern political, legal, administrative and economic aspects, the article gives a brief overview of the development of the Estonian public administration and prison system. It is argued that although no political limits could be identified, there exists some legal and most importantly administrative and economic limits for contracting out prisons in Estonia. There is a need to understand that due to problems inherent in transitional countries such as a low administrative capacity and underdeveloped markets, the implementation of contracting out in cases of complex public services does not solve but transfer the essence of the problems. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

National Varieties of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Comparative Analysis of PPP-Supporting Units in 19 European Countries

Most countries that have adopted the public–private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.