排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Erica L. Romsos M.F.S. Julie L. French M.S. Mark Smith B.S. Vincent Figarelli B.S. Frederick Harran M.S. Glenn Vandegrift Lilliana I. Moreno Ph.D. Thomas F. Callaghan Ph.D. Joanie Brocato Ph.D. Janaki Vaidyanathan M.S. Juan C. Pedroso A.A. Andrea Amy B.S. Stephanie Stoiloff M.S. Victor H. Morillo P.S.M. Karina Czetyrko P.S.M. Elizabeth D. Johnson M.S. Jessica de Tagyos M.S.F.S. Ashley Murray B.S. Peter M. Vallone Ph.D. 《Journal of forensic sciences》2020,65(3):953-959
Three commercially available integrated rapid DNA instruments were tested as a part of a rapid DNA maturity assessment in July of 2018. The assessment was conducted with sets of blinded single-source reference samples provided to participants for testing on the individual rapid platforms within their laboratories. The data were returned to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for review and analysis. Both FBI-defined automated review (Rapid DNA Analysis) and manual review (Modified Rapid DNA Analysis) of the datasets were conducted to assess the success of genotyping the 20 Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) core STR loci and full profiles generated by the instruments. Genotype results from the multiple platforms, participating laboratories, and STR typing chemistries were combined into a single analysis. The Rapid DNA Analysis resulted in a success rate of 80% for full profiles (85% for the 20 CODIS core loci) with automated analysis. Modified Rapid DNA Analysis resulted in a success rate of 90% for both the CODIS 20 core loci and full profiles (all attempted loci per chemistry). An analysis of the peak height ratios demonstrated that 95% of all heterozygous alleles were above 59% heterozygote balance. For base-pair sizing precision, the precision was below the standard 0.5 bp deviation for both the ANDE 6C System and the RapidHIT 200. 相似文献
2.
Technology parks in a developing country: the case of India 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Geetha Vaidyanathan 《The Journal of Technology Transfer》2008,33(3):285-299
Following the economic liberalization of 1991, the government of India established the software technology parks of India
(STPI) scheme and opened numerous software parks around the country. These parks have played a critical role in the growth
of India’s software sector. In recent years, private software parks have also been established in different parts of India.
The government of India is now promoting biotechnology (biotech) parks to encourage growth of this emerging sector. The biotech
parks are still in their infancy with a few operating parks. There are several upcoming biotech parks in different Indian
states with support from the respective state governments. The government of India continues to play an important role in
establishing technology parks. Biotech-Information Technology (Bio-IT) park is the next type of park that the government is
planning to promote. This article discusses the institutional history of these technology parks in India.
相似文献
Geetha VaidyanathanEmail: |
3.
Veda Vaidyanathan 《South African Journal of International Affairs》2019,26(1):113-135
Indian engagement in East Africa’s health sector is multifaceted, comprehensive and involves national and subnational actors. It includes exports of low cost generics, building health infrastructure, aid, technical assistance and hosting medical tourists among others. This paper, based on extensive fieldwork conducted with multiple stakeholders in Kenya and Ethiopia, provides an overview of the various components of India’s co-operation in the East African health sector and identifies pharmaceutical manufacturing as a space for Indian actors to leverage their strengths. It focuses on two case studies of manufacturers: a third-generation company in Kenya owned by members of the Indian diaspora, and a newly formed subsidiary of an Indian corporation in Ethiopia. These case studies inform the larger debate on India’s health diplomacy on the continent and the myriad ways in which the Indian state as well as corporates can enhance existing co-operation. 相似文献
4.
Jennifer Stuart Mark Fondacaro Scott A. Miller Veda Brown Eve M. Brank 《Journal of youth and adolescence》2008,37(6):674-684
The involvement of adolescents with deviant peer groups is one of the strongest proximal correlates to juvenile delinquency
and stems from a variety of causes. Past research has linked ineffective parenting with peer variables, including deviant
peer group involvement and peer conflict during adolescence. In this study, adolescents’ appraisals of procedural justice
within the family (adolescents’ appraisals of how fairly they are treated by parents in the process of resolving family conflict)
were examined as one aspect of effective parenting that may relate to deviant peer group involvement in early adolescence.
Data from 1660 middle school students (ages 11–14, mean = 12.6) indicated that higher appraisals by adolescents of procedural
justice during family conflict resolution were related to lower levels of both peer conflict and deviant peer group involvement.
A structural model was tested in which the relationship between adolescents’ appraisals of procedural justice in the family
and deviant peer group involvement was partially mediated by measures of peer conflict. This model was found to have adequate
fit to the data, indicating that part of the relationship between procedural justice appraisals and deviant peer group involvement
can be explained by levels of peer conflict. Implications of these findings are discussed.
Jennifer L. Stuart is a doctoral student in Counseling Psychology at the University of Florida. Her research interests include adolescent development and juvenile justice. Mark R. Fondacaro is a Professor of Psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice—CUNY. He received his Ph.D. in clinical psychology from Indiana University and his J.D. from Columbia University School of Law. His major research interests are ecological jurisprudence and the conceptualization and assessment of procedural justice in legal and extra-legal contexts including the family and the juvenile justice and health care systems. Scott A. Miller is Professor of Psychology at the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in Child Development from the University of Minnesota. His research focuses on cognitive development in children. Veda E. Brown is an Assistant Professor of Juvenile Justice and Psychology at Prairie View A&M University, Texas. Her research interests include cognitive development in early childhood, especially with reference to the role of parents. Eve M. Brank is an assistant professor in the Department of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of Florida. She received her Ph.D. in Social Psychology and her J.D. from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Law/Psychology program. Her research focuses primarily on families, juveniles, and especially parental responsibility laws. 相似文献
Mark FondacaroEmail: |
Jennifer L. Stuart is a doctoral student in Counseling Psychology at the University of Florida. Her research interests include adolescent development and juvenile justice. Mark R. Fondacaro is a Professor of Psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice—CUNY. He received his Ph.D. in clinical psychology from Indiana University and his J.D. from Columbia University School of Law. His major research interests are ecological jurisprudence and the conceptualization and assessment of procedural justice in legal and extra-legal contexts including the family and the juvenile justice and health care systems. Scott A. Miller is Professor of Psychology at the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in Child Development from the University of Minnesota. His research focuses on cognitive development in children. Veda E. Brown is an Assistant Professor of Juvenile Justice and Psychology at Prairie View A&M University, Texas. Her research interests include cognitive development in early childhood, especially with reference to the role of parents. Eve M. Brank is an assistant professor in the Department of Criminology, Law and Society at the University of Florida. She received her Ph.D. in Social Psychology and her J.D. from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Law/Psychology program. Her research focuses primarily on families, juveniles, and especially parental responsibility laws. 相似文献
1